Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecureEasySetup
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Olaf Davis (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SecureEasySetup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], and [6]. Joe Chill (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The sources located by Joe Chill seem to establish notability, and a search of Google Books seems to back that up. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 10:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Some of the links above a reviews of products using this tech, so not terribly in-depth, but [7], [8], and [9] are almost exclusively about the tech itself. The last link of Joe is also in-depth, but seems just a regurgitated press release by an obscure journalist though. Pcap ping 10:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.