Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simran Bassi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (G11). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 06:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simran Bassi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, promotional article - speedy deletion template removed by brand new editor Melcous (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The second WP:SPA editor who arrived to remove the speedy deletion template also appears to have signed a Talk page comment by the first editor: [1]. AllyD (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article as it stands is a froth of PR backed only by primary sources. My searches, including the tailored Wikiproject India search, are finding nothing better. Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
G11 - Nope. Not doing this crap. This is promotional garbage and is a slam dunk G11, whether an obvious COI SPA removed the CSD is irrelevant. TimothyJosephWood 16:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.