Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmitFraud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SmitFraud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability for this computer virus. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary source to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. The best source I could find was a Google books result that's helpful but not sufficient, at least for me. Msnicki (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: while there is quite a few of references from third-party sources, the notability per WP:NSOFT is not established anywhere. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NSOFT. If extra references are added to the article, feel free to ping me on my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.