Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechRadar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant ^talk 04:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TechRadar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article only exists to identify that this site exists, but does not indicate why it is notable. Appears to fail WP:WEB and WP:NOT#INTERNET. Only references are from Alexa and the company that owns TechRadar. BurtAlert (talk) 05:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —BurtAlert (talk) 05:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes this article is skimpy but an Alexa search indicates TechRadar.com is in the top 300 web sites in GB, nothing to sneeze about. Maybe it is just a matter of getting someone interested to edit it? - I would hate to see this go down the drain Ottawahitech (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has nom gone to the trouble of doing a google news search? I'll admit I'm not familiar with the site, but even 30 seconds of searching shows that this easily passes WP:WEB. I just wonder why nobody's got round to writing a proper article about it. Bienfuxia (talk) 05:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.