Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeleSign
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep (withdrawal; non-admin closure). DivineAlpha (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- TeleSign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional, fails notability (Note: An IP address was challenging this by CSD, creating this on their behalf [not sure if I'm allowed to do that?]) DivineAlpha (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 02:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 02:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -Hi DivineAlpha, yes, you may make afd nominations on behalf of IP editors. However you should precisely note in afd rationale that it is on behalf an IP editor (that I see you did) and procedural in nature (if you are neutral). Coming to the topic, subject appears to be meeting the WP:NCORP and WP:GNG inclusion criteria (sources are cited in the article). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.