Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror 2000

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Been almost a month. Don't think anyone could divine a consensus out of this discussion, so time to call it for now. Feel free to renominate later if desired. Courcelles (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Terror 2000

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this group meet any criteria of WP:BAND. LibStar (talk) 01:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nominator. Doesn't meet WP:BAND PalauanReich (talk) 23:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as there is some reliable sources coverage at AllMusic with a staff written bio and 2 album reviews and a review at Decibel magazine, all linked in the article. Haven't done a full search yet, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources mentioned by Atlantic306 above are websites that catalogs bands and musicians. Those don't really meet the first qualification for WP:BAND, which requires online form of publish works instead. I was not able to find any major coverage in news or books, only passing mentions of the band or its inclusion in lists. There are not enough sources and materials to justify having a Wikipedia article for the band. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both the sources I mentioned are reliable sources as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. The AllMusiic sources include critical reviews of two albums that are secondary coverage rather than primary, the bio is staff written so is also secondary, the Decibel magazine album review is critical secondary coverage. These are the type of sources required by WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. No objection for keeping the article then. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.