Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheMainAttraction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheMainAttraction

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources all sources on article are either YouTube videos or lists of tracks on his albums. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Whispe ring 15:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if you're forced to rely on Napster as a source then it's pretty safe to say that the subject isn't notable. Additionally, based on their username, the article's primary editor would appear to have, if not a strict WP:COI, then a decidedly non-neutral POV when it comes to this topic. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Rosguill. Blatantly fails WP:MUSICBIO. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not satisfy WP:MUSICBIO or any other inclusion criterion. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.