Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fall of Math
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 00:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Fall of Math (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable album Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. What exactly is "math rock?" Is it something heard on Sesame Street or Schoolhouse Rock? Doesn't even come close to satisfying WP:BAND --Manway (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I personally wouldn't be able to describe math rock effectively, not being familiar with most of the bands who perform it, but Wikipedia has had an article about this musical genre for six and a half years. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly a notable album by a notable band, with multiple significant coverage in reliable source. Whether or not you understand what math rock is is irrelevant.--Michig (talk) 08:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The following is from the WP Notability guidelines: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." The band has a robust page of their own that has no notability issues, so this album page is supposedly notable too. Previous contributors have added enough information to get started. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 22:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Michig and Doomsdayer.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.