Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribeca Developers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tribeca Developers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure WP:PROMO. All of the sources appear to be press releases. Sitush (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sitush (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sitush (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 21:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speediest Delete per nom. Oh my Ganesh! I had nominated a similar Mumbai-based 'HBS Realtor' some time back (now deleted), which stood for years! While you're at this, please also savour specimens such as The Imperial 3 (pure CRYSTAL BALL); Growel's 101 (non-notable shopping mall with event calendar); Kohinoor Square - a blot on the actual Kohinoor - I've walked past this monstrosity and eye sore a million times. It's at the centre of a mega scam and is stuck midway on its journey to the skies (see here, here, and here). I'm not sure about the policy, but can an admin please speedy delete these too? These articles do not belong in Wiki, as they're just being misused to add a veneer of credibility to these catastrophic or imagined projects that are the wet dreams of Bombay land mafia! MaysinFourty (talk) 07:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Out of the three projects mentioned in my post, two have been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growel's 101 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imperial 3. Would anyone take a look at Kohinoor Square to see if it needs to go this way as well? As it stands, a lot of fluff has to be removed anyway.. MaysinFourty (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 17:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advertorial. Guy (help! - typo?) 22:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is a puff piece that just touts the company.TH1980 (talk) 04:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and is promotional in tone. -- Dane ^talk 02:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.