Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tritech Research

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tritech Research

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid article .Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH and lacks indepth third party references..Upcoming company a case of WP:TOOSOON Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two of the cited sources focus more on their non-notable product. The rest are insufficient for establishing the company's notability. Alexius08 (talk) 01:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources include a patent and two citations of one contract award, which can be disregarded wrt notability. Which leaves exactly two articles in The Scientist. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH per the nominator. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The two " awards" are actually relatively small research grants, and such grants have in the past not generally been thought to lead to notability.In this case the question of promotionalism is not need, in order to justify the deletion--but it cast some doubt on the judgement of a paid editor to have accepted a commission to write this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) ````
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.