Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Edit Button
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 02:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Universal Edit Button (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, delete. If you remove the list of sites "using" a random software feature, take out that whole section, there is no valid sourcing. Delete. Merrill Stubing (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Site is notable, implemented on numerous widely used wiki sites, covered in notable sources (ReadWriteWeb, developed at notable symposia (WikiSym, RecentChangesCamp) by notable developer, reviewed by notable man who invented the Wiki, Ward Cunningham, used by countless notable wiki sites. All of this is already documented in the article. Sourcing is valid, has nominator reviewed fully before nominating? fish&karate 17:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 01:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, well written article, with valid sources. JIP | Talk 05:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as JIP and fish&karate. It is used on many sites. mabdul 15:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, Though new, it looks legitimate and is perhaps even useful. Warrior777 17:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.