Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wardrox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No sourced claims of notability found; a quick google search shows pretty much nothing but minimal data on open submission sites and forum posts, neither of which qualify as reliable sources. Veinor (talk to me) 14:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is on the online game wardrox, which can be found at http://wardrox.com Wardrox 15:23, 28 June 2007 (GMT)
- Existence of the game is not the issue here; the issue is whether there's enough sources to meet the notability criteria. Veinor (talk to me) 14:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, after reading the notability criteria I can see the article should be removed through lack of sources. I can put the information elsewhere. I am a little surprised though at the harshness of the criteria, but I understand why it's there.Wardrox 11:09, 29 June 2007 (GMT)
- Existence of the game is not the issue here; the issue is whether there's enough sources to meet the notability criteria. Veinor (talk to me) 14:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB and lack of reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced, fails notability guidelines. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable and unreferenced. Terraxos 01:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.