Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiretree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Scott Mac 23:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiretree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band which doesn't yet appear to meet the notability guidelines of WP:MUSIC. Claim to fame is being mentioned in Blurt magazine 1 1/2 years ago. Author, User:Kperoni, also seems to be the leader of this group, see WP:AUTO. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Desire of a page in Wikipedia for the band stems from recent recording of Austin City Limit's Satellite Set session, recorded on 1/26/2011. More accolades might be introduced at a later date depending on wikipedia guidlines for content. User:Kperoni\Kperoni Recent review [Review] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kperoni (talk • contribs) 20:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sorry - later isn't available for this article. You can come back with a new article when the guidelines are met, but at present it doesn't look like they are. According to the Cobaltworks Music site, there is only Wiretree recording for them. This suggests that you also are Cobaltworks - selfpublishing. Or that they are a non-notable micro-label. Also, being in Blurt may be one thing - but being a 'Best Kept Secret' suggests no-one much has heard of you yet. As I said, when you meet the requirements, come back, re-create an article containing your triumphs (but not harleys) on a subpage, and ask a regular editor for advice. Peridon (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Additions as of 01/05/2011: Added song appearance on Canadian TV show, as well as Austin City Limits taping (along with references of both events). Kperoni (talk) 07:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's better than nothing. But, there were nine other songs by various artistes played on that episode, and it's not an appearance by the group on set. Taping (KLRU) isn't broadcasting. Peridon (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep A borderline case, but TV appearances indicate we're missing something here. Should check whether band has toured, etc. I find that a good benchmark as to whether a page is self-promotion is to check how many people are listening to them on last.fm - you can see here that the answer is "some, but not many" http://www.last.fm/music/wiretree - I may be persuaded to change my vote. Bienfuxia (talk) 09:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.