Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/China

WP:DSZH

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to China. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|China|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to China. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/China/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board

China

Huayi Publishing House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a press release and it may be better to WP:STARTOVER. Amigao (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Ji (Ming dynasty politician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article with little verifiability. Not much to expand on and demonstrate sufficient notability against possible deletion. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and China. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cui Songwang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Broadly unsourced biography. Subject is only notable for his coverage of the 2007 Chinese slave scandal, and the article is almost entirely just a fork of the article we have on the topic. The only biographical paragraph is completely unsourced. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 17:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, News media, and China. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 17:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huawei Watch 5

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Huawei Watch already exists therefore this page is duplicative and unnecessary Dahawk04 (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and China. Shellwood (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/update to Huawei Watch Nothing else to add; nom laid it out perfectly and it should just go right to the watch article. Nathannah • 📮 20:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is an admin willing to complete this request? It doesn’t seem there is any controversy or debate on this one. Thanks all! Dahawk04 (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Huawei Watch is a better solution than deletion. A sentence or two may be added there to preserve some basic information. Insillaciv (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Xiaochuan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Little reliable significant coverage online, with Baidu and Bilili being cited in a majority despite being clearly unreliable sources. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Internet, and China. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huyou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to either not be notable or be dictionary content. Wikipedia:Dictionary Ike Lek (talk) 02:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Ike Lek (talk) 02:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Dulu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

subject previously declined at AfC due to lack of reliable sources and notability concerns I know it's a different user who created it this,but they cited the same unacceptable sources, And it appears to have same sourcing deficiencies, with only one reliable academic source (Beckwith) among five citations. Remaining sources include file-sharing sites (dokumen.pub), primary source translations, and unverifiable PDF links that don't meet Wikipedia's reliability standards. Battle does not appear to meet WP:NHIST requirements for historical events and doesn't meet WP:GNG. R3YBOl (🌲) 12:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and China. Shellwood (talk) 14:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chexi railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searched both English and Chinese sources and found no sourcing to satisfy WP:V. Jumpytoo Talk 06:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations and China. Jumpytoo Talk 06:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't read Chinese, so all my research and guesses are done with the assistance of Google Translate. This might be a non-standard or incorrect transliteration, or a station that was renamed. Could it be one of these:
- Qianxi Railway Station (wikidata:Q78327338) railway station in Bijie, Guizhou 9 statements, 2 sitelinks - 10:13, 6 September 2024
- Qianxi Railway Station (wikidata:Q17061065) station of Datong-Qinhuangdao Railway in Qianxi, Tangshan, Hebei 10 statements, 1 sitelink - 23:49, 4 September 2024
- https://en.namu.wiki/w/%EC%B2%B8%EC%8B%9C%EC%97%AD
- zh:黔西站
- https://www.google.com/maps/place/%E9%BB%94%E8%A5%BF%E8%BD%A6%E7%AB%99/@27.01642,106.040543,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x36c058bffd8e6637:0x47846770d0d1a772!8m2!3d27.01642!4d106.040543!16s%2Fg%2F11hf38wm86?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDYwNC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
- Google's AI speculates that the name "Che Xi" is most likely a reference to Xi Jinping, the current General Secretary of the Communist Party of China. He is also known as "People's Leader" and "pilot at the helm." The name "Xi" is also used to refer to other figures like Xi Zhongxun and Xi Shi, but these are less common and are not the same person as the current political leader.
- The China Railway Map site at http://cnrail.geogv.org/enus/about ought to answer our question, but doesn't include a station with this name. If there is an online version of 中华人民共和国铁路车站代码 (Railway station codes of the People's Republic of China), it might be possible to check that we have articles on all the stations on this railway line, and in the process create an article on this station, even if it has been renamed. We might find that the Chinese Wikipedia already has an article on this station under a different spelling. Official directories of railway stations might also include coordinates that could be added to the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I used the Chinese name that was on the route map for Chinese Wikipedia for my BEFORE and that did not turn up anything. The links you provided are all the wrong province and the wrong line so they are not it. And that geogv.org site uses Wikipedia as a source so it is not helpful. Jumpytoo Talk 21:51, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete If we cant get anything on "Chexi" station, I don't see how we can keep this, especially when we are having trouble working out what station this might really be. We definitely don't want to do anything that suggests this is a legitimate name in English for a place. Mangoe (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've checked Baidu Maps, which has a very capable search engine, and found a Chexi toll station, a Chexi scenic area ticket booth, and Chexi village. And to get from Hefei to Chexi village by train seems to end with a 55 minute car ride from Yichang. This seems like a hoax or a mistake. Oblivy (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Pingdingshan mining explosion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and China. XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of coal mining accidents in China#2020s per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 08:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Nanjing building fire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and China. XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable news story. The basic details can be sufficiently covered in the table at List of fires in high-rise buildings. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Zhou, Jie 周洁; Wu, Xue 吴雪 (2024-04-01). "无处安放的电动自行车一场大火牵出的治理难题" [Electric Bikes With Nowhere to Park: A Fire That Exposed a Governance Dilemma]. Xinmin Weekly (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
  The article notes: "元宵节前夜，2024年2月23日4点39分，一场电动自行车引发的大火，让南京市雨花台区明尚西苑小区居民，经历了一场噩梦。起火楼栋位于6栋2单元，由于该小区的垂直天井连通各楼层与1楼架空层，大火通过天井一路往上蹿至二十多层高。接到报警后，20多台消防车赶赴现场救火，直到约清晨6时，明火被扑灭。官方数据显示，这场事故共造成15人遇难，44人受伤。"
  From Google Translate: "On the eve of the Lantern Festival, at 4:39 on 23 February 2024, a fire caused by an electric bicycle made the residents of Mingshang Xiyuan Community in Yuhuatai District, Nanjing City experience a nightmare. The fire building is located in Unit 2, Building 6. Since the vertical patio of the community connects each floor with the overhead floor on the first floor, the fire jumped all the way up through the patio to more than 20 floors. After receiving the alarm, more than 20 fire trucks rushed to the scene to put out the fire until about 6 o'clock in the morning, when the open fire was extinguished. Official data shows that the accident caused a total of 15 deaths and 44 injuries."
  The article notes: " 在收治受伤人员的一家医院中，记者见到了此次火灾的伤者之一张小姐。她告诉《新民周刊》，自己在南京工作，去年下半年刚刚拿到明尚西苑的房本，原本以为是美好生活的开始，没想到，一切就像做了一场梦。在明尚西苑小区，记者看到包括发生火灾的6栋在内，小区内的住宅均设置了多个天井，在一楼与架空层相邻。部分住户为自家窗户安装了防盗窗、搭建了顶棚，也有人在上面放置了一些杂物。"
  From Google Translate: "In a hospital that admitted the injured, the reporter met one of the injured in the fire, Ms. Zhang. She told Xinmin Weekly that she worked in Nanjing and had just received the property title of Mingshang Xiyuan in the second half of last year. She originally thought it was the beginning of a good life, but unexpectedly, everything was like a dream. In Mingshang Xiyuan community, the reporter saw that including the six buildings where the fire broke out, all the houses in the community were equipped with multiple patios, adjacent to the overhead floor on the first floor. Some residents installed anti-theft windows and built ceilings for their windows, and some people placed some sundries on them."
  The article notes: " 南京火灾发生后，上海多个街道都开展了电动自行车安全宣传，市公安部门、消防部门、物业管理部门等都在开展专项检查，相关违规现象、消防隐患正被整改。"
  From Google Translate: "After the Nanjing fire, many streets in Shanghai have carried out electric bicycle safety publicity. The municipal public security department, fire department, property management department, etc. are carrying out special inspections, and related violations and fire hazards are being rectified."
2. Jing, Ming 景明; Mao, Jun 毛俊 (2014-11-27). Wu, Zhichao 伍智超 (ed.). "南京"2·23"15死44伤火灾事故调查报告公布，10人被处罚" [Investigation Report Released on Nanjing "2·23" Fire That Killed 15 and Injured 44; 10 People Penalized]. The Paper (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
  The article notes: "涉事电动自行车车主、非法生产销售锂离子电池个体经营者、南京某物业管理公司项目部负责人等10人因涉嫌犯罪，被公安机关依法采取刑事强制措施。涉事电动自行车生产销售、物业服务等7家企业，由政府相关部门依法依规进行处理。对事故中存在失职失责问题的地方党委政府及有关部门的公职人员进行严肃问责。"
  From Google Translate: "The owner of the electric bicycle involved, the individual operator who illegally produces and sells lithium-ion batteries, the project manager of a property management company in Nanjing, and 10 other people were taken criminal compulsory measures by the public security organs in accordance with the law for suspected crimes. The seven companies involved in the production and sales of electric bicycles, property services, etc., were dealt with by the relevant government departments in accordance with the law. Serious accountability will be held for the local party committees, governments and public officials of relevant departments who have failed to perform their duties in the accident."
3. Shen, Rufa 沈汝发 (2024-11-27). Jiao, Peng 焦鹏 (ed.). "南京"2·23"重大火灾事故调查情况发布 10人被采取刑事强制措施" [Investigation Results Released for Major "2·23" Fire in Nanjing: 10 People Face Criminal Charges] (in Chinese). [[[Xinhua News Agency]]. Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
  The article notes: "事故发生后，江苏省成立“2·23”重大火灾事故调查组，省纪委监委成立事故追责问责审查调查组。调查组查明，火灾原因为小区某住户停放在6号楼2单元东侧架空层的电动自行车锂离子电池热失控起火，引燃周边电动自行车和住户天井内违章搭建并堆放的可燃物，在烟囱效应作用下，燃烧产生的火焰和高温有毒有害烟气快速突破天井内部分住户外窗至室内，多种因素叠加导致火势扩大蔓延，造成人员伤亡。"
  From Google Translate: "After the accident, Jiangsu Province established a "2.23" major fire accident investigation team, and the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision established an accident accountability review and investigation team. The investigation team found out that the cause of the fire was that the lithium-ion battery of an electric bicycle parked on the east side of Unit 2 of Building 6 of a resident in the community ran away from control and caught fire, igniting the surrounding electric bicycles and the combustibles illegally built and stacked in the patio of the residents. Under the chimney effect, the flames and high-temperature toxic and harmful smoke generated by the combustion quickly broke through the outdoor windows of some residents in the patio to the indoors. The superposition of multiple factors caused the fire to expand and spread, causing casualties."
4. Bo, Xiaozhou 薄晓舟, ed. (2024-02-25). "15死44伤，南京居民楼火灾为何伤亡严重？" [15 Dead, 44 Injured: Why Was the Nanjing Apartment Fire So Deadly?]. China Newsweek (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09 – via Sina Corporation.
  The article notes: "明尚西苑小区是于2010年建成的安置房，位于南京市南部地区，共有6栋。据官方通报，此次发生火灾的是第6栋第2单元，有256户，居住人口762人。起火点是2单元一楼的架空层。架空层，多出现在南方城市的建筑中，一楼潮湿，往往不住人，而是被设计为没有外围墙的开敞空间层，便于通风，隔潮。一些开发商会将此处开发为公共活动空间，比如游泳池、会客厅。但不少小区的架空层，最终是用于停放住户的电动车、自行车等。事故所在明尚西苑小区，便是后者。"
  From Google Translate: "Mingshang Xiyuan Community is a resettlement housing complex built in 2010. It is located in the southern part of Nanjing and has a total of 6 buildings. According to official reports, the fire broke out in Unit 2 of Building 6, which has 256 households and a population of 762. The fire started in the overhead floor on the first floor of Unit 2. The overhead floor is mostly found in buildings in southern cities. The first floor is damp and often uninhabited. Instead, it is designed as an open space without outer walls to facilitate ventilation and moisture isolation. Some developers will develop this place into a public activity space, such as a swimming pool or a reception room. However, the overhead floors of many communities are ultimately used to park residents' electric vehicles, bicycles, etc. The Mingshang Xiyuan Community where the accident occurred is the latter."
5. Less significant coverage:
  1. Chen, Rongmei 陈荣梅 (2024-08-07). ""电鸡"停满人行道行人"蛇形走位"穿行有企业推出电单车立体停车库尝试解决占道问题" [E-Bikes Crowd Sidewalks, Forcing Pedestrians to Weave Through Some Companies. Try Multi-Level Parking Solutions to Tackle Obstruction Problem]. Southern Metropolis Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
    The article notes: "南京雨花台区“2·23”火灾事故后，为防止电单车停放小区内引发火灾，全国各地的小区陆续禁止电单车进入小区停放，深圳也不例外。"
    From Google Translate: "After the "2.23" fire accident in Yuhuatai District, Nanjing, in order to prevent fires caused by motorcycles parked in residential areas, communities across the country have successively banned motorcycles from being parked in the communities, and Shenzhen is no exception."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow the subject to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage, which says, "Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle." The event happened on 23 February 2024. The subject received significant coverage in April 2024 and November 2024. Cunard (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Significant coverage has been received in news channels and newspapers such as The Guardian [1], BBC [2], DW News [3], The Hindu [4], Al Jazeera Media Network [5], and CNN [6], as well as investigations in The Paper [7] and China Daily [8]. According to the reports, new regulations regarding the safety of electric bicycles (e.g., bans on charging and parking of electric bicycles) indicate long-term impacts that meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRITERIA. It is mentioned that safety inspections have been intensified in Nanjing and Jiangsu Province, and the investigation held 10 individuals accountable for the fire, including the electric bicycle user, the property management company, and local administration officials. SachinSwami (talk) 15:49, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shaanxi Fast Auto Drive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No wp:sigcov, fails wp:ncorp ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 13:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and China. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 13:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep There is significant independent coverage of the company, especially in the context of its acquisition of Qinchuan machine tool. Should be enough to meet WP:NCORP.

Liu Xiao, 走进市场主体丨“老国企”缘何“霸榜”全球16年？ Market Entrants: Why have “old state-owned enterprises” dominated the global rankings for 16 years? (Xinhua 2022) [9] Lengthy profile of Fast and its dark factory manufacturing

Zhang Weiran, With net profit down by more than 80%, how can Qinchuan Machine Tool get out of the siege? 净利润下降超八成，秦川机床如何走出围城？(The Paper Shaanxi 2024) [10] Lengthy discussion of a Fast subsidiary

There has been no dividend for ten years, and performance depends on subsidies. Faced with the trend of "Fast's acquisition + domestic substitution of high-end machine tools, can Qinchuan Machine Tool learn from its mistakes and become stronger? 十年未分红，业绩靠补助，面对“法士特入主+高端机床国产替代”风口，秦川机床能否知耻而后勇？ (Sina Finance 2022) [11] More discussion of subsidiary along with several paragraphs of corporate history of Fast

Oblivy (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Oblivy's sources. --Iiii I I I (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. The sources found by Jumpytoo.
2. Wang, Pinzhen 王品蓁 (2022). "作业成本法在制造企业中的应用——以陕西法士特汽车传动集团公司为例" [Application of Activity-Based Costing in Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study of Shaanxi Fast Auto Drive Group Company]. 商场现代化 [Market Modernization] (in Chinese). No. 12. doi:10.14013/j.cnki.scxdh.2022.12.021. ISSN 1006-3102. Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09 – via CNKI.
  The abstract notes: "作业成本法自诞生以来，从最开始的成本会计计算方法演变发展为如今的成本管理和产品规划的决策工具。近年来，随着我国汽车制造业飞速发展，与其相关的配套产业也迎来了较大的发展，作为汽车零部件制造商的陕西法士特公司，其对上游企业的过度依赖，制造设备等也较为单一，随着近年来间接费用在产品成本中比重增加，继续使用机械工时进行成本分配，成本信息失真的问题就更有可能出现。本文通过对法士特公司现行成本核算方法的研究，指出其当前所使用的传统成本核算方法的不足，并探讨为何要改用作业成本法进行核算，进一步提出其在推行作业成本法的过程中可能遭遇到的阻力并给出相关意见与方案。"
  From Google Translate: "Since its birth, activity-based costing has evolved from the initial cost accounting calculation method to today's decision-making tool for cost management and product planning. In recent years, with the rapid development of my country's automobile manufacturing industry, its related supporting industries have also ushered in a great development. As an automobile parts manufacturer, Shaanxi Fast Company has excessive dependence on upstream companies, and its manufacturing equipment is relatively simple. With the increase in the proportion of indirect costs in product costs in recent years, the cost information distortion problem is more likely to occur if the cost allocation is continued using machine hours. This paper studies the current cost accounting method of Fast Company, points out the shortcomings of the traditional cost accounting method currently used by it, and explores why it should switch to activity-based costing for accounting. It further proposes the resistance it may encounter in the process of implementing activity-based costing and gives relevant opinions and plans."
3. Ma, Deping 马德平; Gao, Xiaotao 高晓涛 (2015). "陕西法士特年销售收入超百亿2014" [Shaanxi Fast Auto Drive Exceeds 10 Billion Yuan in Annual Sales Revenue in 2014]. 现代企业 [Modern Enterprise] (in Chinese). No. 2. ISSN 1000-9671. Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09 – via CNKI.
  The abstract notes: "＜正＞本刊讯2014年,陕西法士特集团公司累计实现销售收入119亿元,同比增长11%,产销汽车变速器63万台、同比增长11.3%,出口创汇4062万美元,经营业绩增幅明显高于行业增长水平,各项经营指标连续十二年名列全国齿轮行业第一,重型汽车变速器年产销量连续九年稳居世界第一。去年,法士特新产品全面发力,为整车轻量化和节能化而设计的全铝合金壳体变速器增势迅猛,产销量已占变速器总销量20%以上,全面满足了节能减排、低碳环保的市场需求,成为推动企业生产经营稳健增长新亮点。自主研发的具有完全自主知识产"
  From Google Translate: "According to our magazine, in 2014, Shaanxi Fast Gear Group Co., Ltd. achieved a total sales revenue of 11.9 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 11%. It produced and sold 630,000 automobile transmissions, a year-on-year increase of 11.3%. Its exports earned 40.62 million US dollars. The growth rate of its operating performance was significantly higher than the industry growth rate. Various operating indicators have ranked first in the national gear industry for twelve consecutive years, and the annual production and sales of heavy-duty automobile transmissions have ranked first in the world for nine consecutive years. Last year, Fast's new products were fully launched. The all-aluminum alloy housing transmission designed for lightweight and energy-saving vehicles has grown rapidly. The production and sales volume has accounted for more than 20% of the total transmission sales volume, fully meeting the market demand for energy conservation, emission reduction, low carbon and environmental protection, and becoming a new highlight in promoting the steady growth of the company's production and operation. Self-developed products with completely independent intellectual property rights"
4. "Shaanxi Fast Gear Co., Ltd". 陕西政报 [Gazette of the Shaanxi Provincial People's Government] (in Chinese). No. 7. 2003. ISSN 1003-9333. Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09 – via CNKI.
  The abstract notes: "陕西法士特齿轮有限责任公司是由陕西汽车齿轮总厂与湖南湘火炬投资股份有限公司共同投资组建的,现有西安、宝鸡两大生产基地,占地67万平方米,职工3000人。主要生产重型汽车变速器、分动器、取力器、各种汽车齿轮及其锻件。主导产品为从美国引进的号称"世界王牌"的富勒变速器,自投产以来一直是我国重型汽车市场的主流产品,现已占有国内15吨以上重型汽车市场85%以上的份额。法士特公司拥有强大的齿轮配件生产能力,率先在国内同行业中进入国际 OEM配套领域,年出口齿轮200万只以上,创汇额位居国内同行业之首。"
  From Google Translate: "Shaanxi Fast Gear Co., Ltd. was jointly invested and established by Shaanxi Automobile Gear Factory and Hunan Xianghuoju Investment Co., Ltd. It currently has two major production bases in Xi'an and Baoji, covering an area of 670,000 square meters and 3,000 employees. It mainly produces heavy-duty automobile transmissions, transfer cases, power take-offs, various automobile gears and forgings. The leading product is the Fuller transmission introduced from the United States, known as the "world ace". Since its production, it has been the mainstream product in my country's heavy-duty automobile market and now occupies more than 85% of the domestic heavy-duty automobile market above 15 tons. Fast has a strong gear parts production capacity and is the first in the domestic industry to enter the international OEM supporting field. It exports more than 2 million gears annually and ranks first in the domestic industry in terms of foreign exchange earnings."
5. "陕西法士特汽车传动集团公司" [Shaanxi Fast Automotive Transmission Group Co., Ltd.]. 陕西工业和信息化年鉴 [Shaanxi Industrial and Information Technology Yearbook] (in Chinese). 2020. pp. 342–344. doi:10.40149/y.cnki.yjisa.2021.001110. Archived from the original on 2025-06-09. Retrieved 2025-06-09 – via CNKI.
  The abstract notes: "该公司始建于1968年。旗下拥有10多家控、参股子公司,在泰国建有独资工厂,在美国设有分销公司,是中国齿轮行业首家年产销超100亿元企业。公司先后获“全国文明单位”“全国五一劳动奖状”“全国国企十大典型”“全国企业文化建设最佳实践企业”“中国工业大奖"
  From Google Translate: "The company was founded in 1968. It has more than 10 holding and shareholding subsidiaries, a wholly-owned factory in Thailand, and a distribution company in the United States. It is the first enterprise in China's gear industry with an annual production and sales of more than 10 billion yuan. The company has successively won the "National Civilized Unit", "National May 1st Labor Award", "Top Ten Typical State-owned Enterprises in the Country", "National Best Practice Enterprise for Corporate Culture Construction", "China Industrial Award""
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Shaanxi Fast Auto Drive (simplified Chinese: 陕西法士特集团; traditional Chinese: 陝西法士特集團) to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Zhehan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to support notability Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and China. Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Yongrui. --Iiii I I I (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the article fails basic critera WP:SPORTBASIC. Stvbastian (talk) 02:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If every article ever created through passing NBAD gets quick deletion unless GNG is proved immediately, then what's the point of NBAD? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
After NFOOTY was thrown out, I believe there is little to no point to any of the sport SNGs. All NBAD says is that "coverage is likely to exist". It's not a policy or guideline. Geschichte (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

del no coverage. --Altenmann >talk 20:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Yongrui

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to support notability Stvbastian (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and China. Stvbastian (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Chen meets WP:NBADMINTON, as he and Chen Zhehan have won a Super 100-level tournament together. --Iiii I I I (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the article fails basic critera WP:SPORTBASIC. Stvbastian (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've found a little coverage [12][13][14] but not much. The Asian Junior Championships medal seems promising, until you realize that it's just a team event where he was one of 16 players [15]. (For non-badminton folks, the format is kinda explained here. Surprising that we don't have an article on it.) My best argument against deletion is that these are young players and my illegal crystal ball says that there is a decent chance they will garner more coverage in future. Toadspike [Talk] 10:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per @User:Toadspike explanation, that means this artilce is WP:TOOSOON and fails SIGCOV. So, for now this article should be archive or delete. Thanks Stvbastian (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop pushing for this discussion to be closed as soon as possible in your favor. I've already explained that Chen Yongrui meets notability standards, Toadspike has provided sources, and here are some more: [16][17][18].

Looking at your past deletion nominations, you are clearly aware of what NBADMINTON says, and yet you still nominated this page. These recent nominations appear to be motivated by a personal grudge against the page creator. If you can't be objective, you should step away from editing Wikipedia for a while. Iiii I I I (talk) 00:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have read all the sources that you given, but i can't found any articles that pass the notability for Chen Yongrui page. GNG clearly said "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Im just follow the Wikipedia rules, and hope that the Wikipedia articles looks better. Thanks Stvbastian (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

del insufficient in-depth coverage. --Altenmann >talk 20:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jingyi Jessica Li

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional biography. Article author has moved this to mainspace after several declines at AFC, and has resisted re-drafticiation, so here we are at AFD. The only independent reliable source cited is for a listing on Innovators Under 35's regional China sublist. The rest of the citations are written by the article subject. I have looked and not been able to find better sourcing. One source is not enough to hang WP:GNG on, and they do not appear to meet any of the criteria in WP:NPROFESSOR, so I think this one ought to be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MrOllie (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Biology, Medicine, China, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - her citation record (h-index over 30, 13 publications with 100+ citations) looks OK for WP:NPROF#1 (maybe a bit borderline) but I would say that her Overton Prize and recent Guggenheim Fellowship (I just added that information to the article) count for WP:NPROF#2. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Overton Prize and the Guggenheim Fellowship both contribute to WP:PROF #2 ("highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level"). After receiving the Overton Prize, there was an extended article on her in the journal Bioinformatics [19], which also contributes to notability. I did a little tidying up to make this less resume-like and more appropriate for Wikipedia. DaffodilOcean (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:TOOSOON. While the awards are relevant, they are all early career to at most mid-career, so not the type of major peer awards for WP:NPROF#C2 IMO. When I look at her citations, I think we need to ignore the first (consortium) source. With just the others she has an h-factor of 33, which by comparison to some of her co-authors such as Peter J. Bickel, Steven E. Brenner or Kai-Wai_Chang is not that impressive, it is not a low citation area. (The first two are more senior, but Chang is not.) I am not impressed by just having a few articles with > 100 cites, my benchmark is more > 1000. Perhaps I am harder to impress... Ldm1954 (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:NPROF#2a; the Guggenheim Fellowship is limited to mid-career (and later) academics (not students, even postgrads) and is even listed as an example for prestigious awards. ミラP@Miraclepine 22:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yuquanying

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable intersection. In attempting to source this article, I was unable to find any valid sources about this particular intersection, much less anything that would contribute to notability. Garsh (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China. Shellwood (talk) 23:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It seems odd to me that the article is focused on an intersection. Isn't Yuquanying a major road, not just an intersection? (There seem to be many articles about the road and building complexes on the road via Google News.) Cielquiparle (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability and I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indication of notability. Jeepday (talk) 11:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Yuquanying Subdistrict. The Chinese name here is 玉泉营, which seems to refer to a variety of topics in that area, but I think all can be covered at the main subdistrict article. That article could be expanded with this source, which covers the history of the area in depth, though its reliability could be debated [20]. Toadspike [Talk] 11:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Sources have been added, focus has been expanded to mention Yuquanying's 800 years of history as one of the 18 floricultural villages of the Fengtai district of Beijing before becoming the site of a major highway intersection and overpass. (OK I'm still in the process of untangling how best to cite and/or edit that section, which could still take several days as I try to work on other things.) Sincerely appreciate the pointer to the administrative subdistrict page provided by Toadspike (not to mention their spirit of investigation which is what makes these geography AfD puzzles interesting), but the modern administrative subdistrict article can remain separate from the Yuquanying article about the history of the village since the Jin dynasty. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have mixed feelings about this – I considered expanding this article, but decided that Yuquanying Subdistrict, an article about a populated place, is more suitable for this information. I don't mean to be rude, but you have effectively hijacked this article and changed its topic to one that we already cover elsewhere. Toadspike [Talk] 09:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The 800-year history of the village of Yuquanying, where there is now also a highway overpass, is not covered at all in the current article about Yuquanying Subdistrict, which focuses on an administrative region established in 2021. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can only have one topic claiming notablity per GEOLAND on this, and here it should be the legally-recognized subdistrict. Of the three sources you link, the first is about the subdistrict, the second lists Yuquanying among other subdistricts like Majiapu Subdistrict and some places that don't seem to have legal recognition, and the third is a mathematical analysis of traffic at the intersection that doesn't actually tell us anything about the intersection. I am not convinced this shows the need for a split from the main subdistrict article. Toadspike [Talk] 10:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, we can still keep looking for more sources; those were just indicative and as I said, it's still a work in progress. The first source actually leads with the modern Yuquanying subdistrict but the third paragraph is about the historical village of Yuquanying and its 800-year history as a flower town. The second source is interesting because it references the historical (centuries-old) concept of the 18 villages of Fengtai district, which is discussed elsewhere in books and suggests a fruitful line of research, and also provides more context about the floricultural history of the region. (Actually not sure what to do with "Beijing Yuquanying highway" in the third source; not even sure if it's actually about the actual intersection or overpass. Is it? Very unclear from looking at the article.) Anyway Wikipedia is full of multiple articles about the same geographic location. We could easily keep splitting this article into sub-topics and at minimum, Yuquanying would have to be retained as a disambiguation page. (And yes, you are correct: it is more polite to assume good faith per WP:AGF.) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: per Toadspike, I don't see a convincing argument for keeping both Yuquanying Subdistrict and Yuquanying, the history part of this article, which I guess was added post-nom, can be put in the subdistrict article and this can redirect there. Moritoriko (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not even clear that the administrative region is geographically in the same place as the old village! In fact, it subsumes several old neighbouring villages, possibly. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chinese geography and naming is a bit outside my wheelhouse, but would you say it is likely that the name of the subdistrict was chosen because of the old village? Doing further research on the "18 villages of Fengtai" is not showing me much of anything either, perhaps that information should be put in that article instead. Moritoriko (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Qianxi tourist boat capsizings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. No WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE after the spike of news reports following the event. XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and China. XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge/redirect to Qianxi, Guizhou per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. The event happened on 4 May 2025. Less than a month after the event, it is unknown whether sources will continue covering the subject in the future to demonstrate it is notable. Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage says:
However, this may be difficult or impossible to determine shortly after the event occurs, as editors cannot know whether an event will receive further coverage or not. That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable.
I support a selective merge of between one sentence to a paragraph to the history section of the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Shandong factory explosion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance. XYZ1233212 (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and delete per point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA. - Amigao (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, random news story and not subject to sustained secondary coverage. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 23:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge/redirect to List of explosions#27 May 2025 Shandong explosion, where the subject is already mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. The event happened on 27 May 2025. Less than a week after the event, it is unknown whether sources will continue covering the subject in the future to demonstrate it is notable. Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage says:
However, this may be difficult or impossible to determine shortly after the event occurs, as editors cannot know whether an event will receive further coverage or not. That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable.
I support a selective merge of between one sentence to a paragraph to the "Details" column of the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't fully assessed notability here, but if it's deemed not notable, then redirect List of explosions#27 May 2025 Shandong explosion is an appropriate alternative to deletion. MarioGom (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge/redirect to List of explosions#27 May 2025 Shandong explosion. Even if this article is considered not notable enough to be an article of its own, I also support a merge as it is still notable enough for a small list. TheSwagger13 (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a CCTV video too. TheSwagger13 (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong related deletions

Taiwan related deletions

Chen Cheng-kuan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to support notability Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and Taiwan. Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NBADMINTON. --Iiii I I I (talk) 09:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the article fails basic critera WP:SPORTBASIC. Stvbastian (talk) 02:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]