Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

[edit]

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

[edit]

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, May 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]

National Assembly of Hungary member stubs

[edit]

Not sure what to call this category/template (maybe {{NationalAssemblyHungary-bio-stub}}?), but the category Hungarian politician stubs is huge and I want to diffuse it somehow; see here for the articles awaiting whatever the new template/category might be... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not all, probably not even the majority, but some of the articles use MP so I would suggest {{Hungary-MP-stub}} (I had expected MNA but...) and Category:Member of the National Assembly of Hungary stubs. Waacstats (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'll get started on that... eventually... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inorganic compound stubs

[edit]

Category:Inorganic compound stubs is oversized; I think this sub-template and category should be created to help diffuse it:

support, wish i new more about chemistry but it looks good to me, just a thought would it not be MetalHalide as we used to use the - to indicate a split and we don't have any halide stub category. Waacstats (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1940s American Western (genre) film stubs

[edit]

1940s American film stubs is huge, and a majority of the films in that category are Westerns, so I propose making 1940s American Western (genre) film stubs a subcategory of that and 1940s Western (genre) film stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets it off the over 600 list and fits the established pattern. Waacstats (talk) 12:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buryatia geography stubs subtemplates

[edit]

Category:Buryatia geography stubs (628) is a bit oversized, and the stub template has too many transclusions, so I propose making these subtemplates for the individual districts:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Novosibirsk Oblast geography stubs

[edit]

Proposing the creation of a new category; {{NovosibirskOblast-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:31, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Waacstats (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

17th-century English MP stubs

[edit]

Category:17th-century English MP stubs (814) is oversized; I propose these sub-templates and categories (I might recommend more in the future):

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support along with the 14th Century one below. These have been on my list to look at but I needed a break from English MPs after the double/triple/etc stubbing nightmare of the last one I did. Waacstats (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to worry about the categories later and focus more on the templates, though - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paris geography stubs

[edit]

Propose the creation of a new stub category; {{Paris-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions, and {{Paris-road-stub}} needs a more fitting parent category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suppoprt more than adequetly fits set pattern. Waacstats (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

14th-century English MP stubs

[edit]

This category is oversized. I propose splitting it up:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OpalYosutebito: What is "this category"? I've looked, and Category:14th century English MP stubs doesn't exist, and is moreover empty. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's always best to link it, (a) so that we can inspect it and (b) so that you can see if you made a typo. Templates like {{cl}} and {{clc}} amy be used for this, as follows: Category:14th-century English MP stubs (738) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it again, don't worry - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't put template transclusions in section headings, it screws the inward links. See MOS:HEADINGS. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot about that, sorry. Thanks for your feedback and understanding! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:40, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland glacier stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Greenland-glacier-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thai volleyball biography stubs

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sorted to below oversized but can do with some more, the following is viable though some of these articles are in already existing stub cats due to the nature of the party:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sao Paulo State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700, we don't have perm cats for any smaller areas but List of municipalities in São Paulo gives a list of municipalities by Intermediate Regions also known as Mesoregions. I propose we use these to split the category

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

La Paz department (Bolivia) geos

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, the next down level is for provinces so I propose we split by these. There are no perm cats so I can't say which if any will pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Norwegian writers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, according to petscan nearly 300 are novelists, I think that might be picking up incorrect categories but I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American architects

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is significantly greater than 700 and could do with a trim. There doesn't seem to be any logical split through the sub-cats so I propose one of the old stand bys of century of birth along the lines of :

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Canterbury archdeacons

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is closing in on 700 articles, a couple of individual Dioceses have enough articles for there own categories but I think it would be better to split by century of birth, giving us the following, unless there are a lot hiding the first two will be template only:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Motorcycle manufacturers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Motorcycle stubs is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following category:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Christian clergy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category was just over 600 and needs a good sort however the following appear viable and Ireland would already have some sub cats.

*Irish Christian clergy stubs {{Ireland-Christian-clergy-stub}} - petscan

I would also like to propose that along with the existing Roman Catholic and Oriental Orthodox categories we add one for Anglican clergy

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the Irish category I forgot we already have subcats for Anlican clergy and RC clergy which take nearly everything. Waacstats (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have surpassed the magical 60 mark and so are eligible for a category:

Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American painter stub categories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

speedy support, may be a few more as I have just sorted American people stubs and moved a few articles in to these templates. Waacstats (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose breaking up Ammonite stubs into sub-templates/sub-cats:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to speak to WP:Paleo, I looked at this a month or so ago and they were looking at redoing the categorisation of articles. Waacstats (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acianthera stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Make this a subcat/subtemplate of {{Epidendreae-stub}}; there are over 110 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

deupmergers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have passed 60 and could do with the attached categories:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Military units

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, this one near enough jumped off the screen as being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Punjab,_Pakistan_geography_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700 artricles, well sorted to upmerged templates and a few by district categories, no existing templates pass 60 so I propose reorganising by Division but we will need to check the divisions will get 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British Columbia interior geo stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, and British Columbia mountain stubs is over 700 and fortunatly there is a big overlap, also coast geo and mountains have a large overlap and both are over 700 so I propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mine stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create Russian mine stubs.
Over 600 articles, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't support the second one cuz there are only 59 results, but the first one looks good - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:40, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Swedish actors

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, propose the usual split of actors, usual caveat of templates first. I have not done petscan search because these tend to be unreliable for actors:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pakistan MNA's

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Members of the National Assembly of Pakistan is currently just under 700, we have split the Punjab regional parliment by party, I propose the same here. One problem is that the categorisation by party in Punjab was a bit sparse and required a hand sort, I assume the problem exists here as well as only 400 articles are in the MNA by party category. Based on that i propose the following with the usual templates first caveat:

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Irish Anglican clergy stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have already split the bishops, I propose the deans follow

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s rock song stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Recently removed all the metal but still large, I propose we continue the removal with the indies going

Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cacia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before; make it part of Mesosini stubs; 119 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』

Support both splits of Mesosini stubs Waacstats (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agelasta stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is oversized; I propose a subcategory for the 85 articles pertaining to Agelasta - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Frea (genus) stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are a bunch of Crossotini stubs that pertain to the frea genus; see here for the 84 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good Support.Waacstats (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, April 2025

[edit]

Thai singer stubs

[edit]

I propose the creation of a new category; {{Thailand-singer-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy support Waacstats (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Parliament member stubs

[edit]

Idk what to call this, but I found a bunch of members of the Parliament of Finland that are stubs (over 300 articles). What should it be called? I'm unsure of the name because I've never dealt with a stub type of this nature before... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We have already splits by party, may be worth continueing that if possible first but if we do choose to go this way I would go

Waacstats (talk) 13:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

looking at it, a tidy up to existing categories should get this below 500 and I think a couple of by party splits may well be viable, I'll have a proper look later. Waacstats (talk) 13:47, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How do the following look, each party has over 60 stubs and I feel there are still some unmarked stubs for each party, should take out 250 articles.

Splitting a huge film stub

[edit]

1910s drama film stubs is huge. An overwhelming majority of the transclusions are from American silent drama films; there are over 900 articles awaiting the new template {{1910s-US-drama-film-stub}} and subcategory 1910s American drama film stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There should also be 1920s silent American drama film stubs ({{1920s-silent-US-drama-film-stub}}) for over 1000 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support doen't do much to get rid of large categories but will help. Waacstats (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even more French geography stubs because it's a running gag at this point

[edit]

All of these templates will have an associated category

Pyrénées-Atlantiques geography stubs
Charente geography stubs
Côtes-d'Armor geography stubs

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support obviously, there are a few small towns/villages that have small populations with similar names but I think we can ignore them Waacstats (talk) 13:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

deupmergers

[edit]

Templates over 60 so speedy propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Organic compound stubs

[edit]

Oversized category, not my area of expertise but the following look to be viable based on perm cats, there is some overlap but hopefully not too much, this should get it off the oversized list.

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, but I'm not super fluent in this, either... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Poland athletics biographies

[edit]

We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; these athletics categories are thicc - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, other athletic bio categories that should be split up like that include those for the Finnish, Spanish, Swedish, Australian and Chinese stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:56, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Painting stubs

[edit]

We have a split of painting stubs by century, some of these have already been split by decade, given the 17th and 16th century categories are over 600 I propose we atleast create the by decade templates for these, with categories for those that pass the 60 mark, as this would leave the 18th century still by century I propose we do the same for that category as well. So I propose the following for each decade of the three centuries:

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BBC television shows

[edit]

Category has over 700 articles, I propose the following splits:

Names are taken from the perm cats, there may be some overlap but I don't think there will be too much. Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines tv shows

[edit]

Closing in on 700 articles, I propose a split by genre as such:

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

German tv shows

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Germans have over 600 articles here so I propose the following split:

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the TV splits - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US non-fiction tv shows

[edit]

Comfortably in the mid 600 article range and badly categorised by the looks of things. I propose a split of the documentaries and movve them up a level as they are not categorized this way in the perm cats so:

We also need a consensus on if we go with 'United States blah' or 'American' blah in the parent cat, but I assume this will need to go to CFD Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The parent categories should be "American" and the templates should be "US" (not "United States", but abbreviated to "US") - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should these be titled "show" instead of "series"? Her Pegship (?) 22:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa buildings

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Extremely large category, too many counties to do all of them, I propose the following counties which appear to have enough articles for a category:

between these they should remove about 300 articles. By the way if anyone wants all 99 counties I have no objection to them creating them. Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

rock song stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The 2000s sub cat is oversiazed, we have split heavy metal songs out of its parent so propose doing the same with the larger subcats.

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ghanaian people stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Was over 600 before a nice sort, none of the existing upmerged templates reached 60 however I would like to propose the following two categories with templates

I also see high value in the future for the following three upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian 17th Century RC Bishops

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category has become quiet large. I propose that we split the archbishops out into a separate category

Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yonne geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:48, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aube geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nord (French department) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I beat you to this one last week. Waacstats (talk) 06:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You still didn't make categories, but don't worry! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the categories. Sorry, got called away so couldn't finish the categories. Waacstats (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay. I also added WikiProjects - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Haute-Marne geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Haut-Rhin geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bas-Rhin geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all the above French geo splits.Waacstats (talk) 06:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Guangzhou-geo-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

The template was considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 5#Template:Guangzhou-geo-stub, but was kept. It now has 61 translcusions, so we are all set to create a category. (This is my first nomination here; apologies for any formatting mistakes.) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (not sure how to close this?) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Try asking @Pegship - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Catching up today with closing...thanks, all Her Pegship (?) 19:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ardennes (department) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category is big, so please separate into numerous subtemplates/categories:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eure-et-Loir geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ain geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Marne (department) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Meurthe-et-Moselle geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vosges (department) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Minsk region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sarthe geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Maine-et-Loire geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suppoort both french splits Waacstats (talk) 18:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cyprus geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support idea but would it be an worth adding district so as to not limit these to the towns/cities. Waacstats (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia (country) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support no issues here Waacstats (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Riyadh Province geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another Saudi Arabian geography stub proposal. I'm finding these as I work, so sorry if this comes off as super spammy. Anyway, here are the 85 articles waiting for the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Medina Province (Saudi Arabia) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another Saudi Arabian geography stub proposal; see here for the 79 articles awaiting the new template/category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mecca Province geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before; make {{Mecca-geo-stub}} a subtemplate of {{SaudiArabia-geo-stub}}; see here for the 172 articles awaitng the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jizan Province geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{SaudiArabia-geo-stub}} is oversized. See here for the 86 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all the Saudi province stubs, though some one may have to look at Jizan some time, the article has two As while the category has an I and A but that is outside our jurisdiction. Waacstats (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bago Region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Bago-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy support Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bhojpur district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Bihar geography stubs is huge. See here for the 90+ articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support idea however Bhojpur District is a disambig page with a disctrict of Nepal, Propose we add disambig to the category and template,

maybe a Bhojpur district, Bihar geography stubs and BhojpurIN-geo-stub template? Waacstats (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Bhojpur district, India" would be more fitting - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:56, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kerala river stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Kerala-river-stub}} should be a category of India river stubs and Kerala geography stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support no issues hereWaacstats (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gujarat river stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Gujarat-river-stub}} should be a category of India river stubs and Gujarat geography stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Morbi district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
You guys forgot a district from Gujarat. Anyway, please just make a new template ({{Morbi-geo-stub}}); there are only 7 articles that need it. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support fills the missing gap. Waacstats (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pas-de-Calais geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting off into the following subtemplates/categories:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the places called Saint Omer are probably small enough that we wont have a geo stub for them any time soon, there are a load of communes called Montreuil but most have other parts to there name so again should be ok.. Waacstats (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seine-et-Marne geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of places called Meaux, but they are really small and I think we will be safe from having a geo stub for them so Support.Waacstats (talk) 17:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hesse mountain stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
114 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are also 119 hill-related articles waiting, too - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support follows set pattern. Waacstats (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Viseu geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Viseu-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy create. Waacstats (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jongno District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Seoul geography stubs looks a little chubby, so I propose making Jongno District geography stubs a subcat/subtemplate; see here for the 60 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no issues here, Support. Waacstats (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oaxaca municipality geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not sure how to break this up, but apparently 459 out of the 513 articles in Oaxaca geography stubs are in Municipalities of Oaxaca, so I suggest making {{Oaxaca-municipality-stub}} and its own subcat - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not to keen on this,I think this would be a bit like having a category for all the towns/villages in California. I think if we do split this it should be by region or district, which does seem to be in most of the articles I looked at but not in the categories so would require a hand sort. Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Haiti geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Haiti geography stubs looks pretty big to me; I propose splitting it up into separate templates (and categories, but only for those with over 60 articles waiting)

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of countries in Africa have a ouest province so I would probably want the template disambigd, Sud is the IOC code for Sudan so again a disambig might be worth while. I think a couple of the others have disambig pages for the articles but for very small places that we can get away with, but maybe disambig the remaining compass points as well just in case. Waacstats (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Costa Rica geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Costa Rica geography stubs is pretty big; I propose creating the following templates and categories:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support in general, please can we disambig San Jose, obviously a large US city, and Cartago is best known as the city in Colombia according to the disambig page. Waacstats (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Northern Region, Manitoba geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but there are 60 articles awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Southern Manitoba geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but there are 171 articles awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Westman Region, Manitoba geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Manitoba geography stubs is oversized in my opinion, so I recommend making a subcategory and sub-template for 82 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I presume this is a subcat of the above Southern Manitoba Waacstats (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's a different region altogether - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per the perm cats, Westman region is asub cat of Southern Manitoba. Waacstats (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More New Brunswick geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting up {{NewBrunswick-geo-stub}} into sub-templates (including the one I already mentioned) based on the county:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Support the idea of the split, however I strongly feel it might be an idea to disambig all the templates with NB as a lot of those county names seem familier from US counties, other Canadaian states and even UK and Ireland counties for example the disabiguation page Northumberland County, as in the county proposal below, exists in New South Wales, Ontario, England, Virginia and Pennsylvania besides here in New Brunswick. Waacstats (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Northumberland County, New Brunswick geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
65 articles waiting for the new template and cagtegory - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As above, Support especially if we add the NB as disambig. Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s silent drama film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category is oversized, a quick scan shows that a good number are french, therefore I propose the following, it wont get it off the oversized list but it will help:

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cancel the request here, the category tree threw a wobbler and there are no where near enough articles. Waacstats (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1950s American film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not quite oversized but getting there, the following are both viable:

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1990s American film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another film category over 700, the following are all viable and therefore propose

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Malaysian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category over 700, not enough senators have stub articles but there are enough MPs, so I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Member of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another category over 700 a couple of partys have enough stub articles to make categories over 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ternopil Oblast geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A Large Ukrainian geo category, I propose we split by each of its 3 Raions, Kremenets might be a bit on the small side at the moment, unless there a number of badly categorised stubs so templates first, categories if we reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - sounds pretty good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kermanshah County geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Moving over to Iran, this one has over 700 articles, I propose a split by district, unfortunatly there are no by district categories but a hand sort should allow us to split these by district. I therefore propose the following, with templates first followed by categories for those that pass the sixty mark:

I have left the county name in a couple to avoid confusion with other Iranian districts with the same name, I think every county has a central district. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport org stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having just created upmerged templates I have sorted through some of these (and pushed the category oversized) and so far the following categories are viable:

The Brazil category does assume teams are organisations, which they are according to the perm cats. Note I have carried the spelling of organization/organisation from the fooian organisation stubs. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ancient Greek people

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, over 200 are in the monarchs category so I propose a royal category to fit in with our norms

Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petscan is not completly rreliable here only abouut a third are actually royalty, Waacstats (talk) 06:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian Roman Catholic church stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
After sorting the Italian church stubs, this become large enough for a split, I propose by Italian region as we have done with the geo categories, not all regions will get to 60 so templates first, categories for those that make it to 60 (I know Lazio, Lombardy and Tuscany at least make it to 60)

I have taken the names as per the geo split do we need to change the names of the Calabrian and Campanian categories here and in geo to Calabria and Campania. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kazakhstan geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Well over 600 articles, we already have two by region subcats, I propose we finish this off with the following, and a lot of hand sorting after doing the petscan searches:

please note that the template for Almaty (city) currently exists as a redirect to the surronding region, we also have two upmerged templates without Region for Aktobe and Atyrau which I propose redirecting to the above templates. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korea geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently at 700 articles with one city split out I porpose we split by the remaining provincal level divisions (a mix of provinces and cities):

Disambigd Gangwon as this historical province is now split between the North and South with both retaining the same name in Korean but being transliterated differently into the Roman alphabet. As the perm cats use the South Korea disambig I followed suit.Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

My go at French geo stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I was beginning to feel like I was missing out on something with all of Opal's work on the french geo splits, fortunatly it looks like they have left me with a couple of categories with over 700 articles. I therfore propose the following splits:

From Oise

From Nord:

Dunkirk wont be big enough per petscan but I propose the template and if after handsorting there are enough articles the category can follow.Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - thanks for the catch! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I mainly work on categories that have over 500 articles in them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to work on 600+, but these have 700 articles. Waacstats (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States mountain stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{US-mountain-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, something tells me this is under used. Waacstats (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missouri ghost town stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
120 articles awaiting {{Missouri-ghost-town-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missed this one before but Support Waacstats (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Highland geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Highland geography stubs is kind of oversized, so I propose splitting by committee area:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Even more French geography stubs that should be created

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create all, zut alors!.

Eure geography stubs

[edit]

Gironde geography stubs

[edit]

Dordogne geography stubs

[edit]

Haute-Garonne geography stubs

[edit]

Hautes-Pyrénées geography stubs

[edit]

Puy-de-Dôme geography stubs

[edit]

Isère geography stubs

[edit]
There are a couple of French communes named Langon, it might be worth adding Arrondissement to the template to distinguish it from the communes not in this arrondissement, I think we can get away without for Bernay, as all the other communes on the disambig page have other parts to the name. otherwise support all these. Waacstats (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manche geography stubs

[edit]

Avranches Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Avranches-geo-stub}} should be created for 179 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cherbourg Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Cherbourg-geo-stub}} should be created for 187 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Coutances Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Coutances-geo-stub}} should be created for 116 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Lô Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{SaintLô-geo-stub}} should be created for 131 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support cant see any issues with these at all. Waacstats (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calvados (department) geography stubs

[edit]

Lisieux Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Lisieux-geo-stub}} should be created for 207 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again there is a community in Saskatchewan but our srticle is a stub so probably no need to disambig so as with all others Support Waacstats (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caen Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Caen-geo-stub}} should be created for 220 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bayeux Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Bayeux-geo-stub}} should be created for 127 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a town of 97,000 people with the same name in Brazil, but given our arrticle on it is a stub I dont think we need t disambig here so Support. Waacstats (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vire Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Vire-geo-stub}} should be created for 117 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orne geography stubs

[edit]

Alençon Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Alençon-geo-stub}} should be created for 136 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Argentan Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{Argentan-geo-stub}} should be created for 164 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mortagne-au-Perche Arrondissement geography stubs

[edit]

{{MortagneauPerche-geo-stub}} should be created for 205 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all the orne splits. Waacstats (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Softball teams

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
looking through the sports team categories recently, plenty of these for a category as a petscan search shows here

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

USSR Olympic medalist stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Fairly large we have already split out the winter Olympics and a couple of other sports, I propose we continue this with the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Autoracing teams

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having sorted the motorsport stubs category I notice there are I was moving a lot of teams into autoracing stubs, as can be seen in this petscan search here so I propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Negro league baseball pitcher stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get a bit large, I propose a by decade of birth split for the decades needed, I think this will mean 1860s through to 1930s. templates and categories to follow the pattern below

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nigerian politicians

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Was our largest none tree of life category. It looks like someone started to split by State, not sure this is the best way to go, but it is the thing that most articles seem to have in them even if not categorized there. I propose the following, obviously templates first and categories only for those that make it past the 60 mark.

I have taken the template names based off the geo split, adding the "State" to the category seems to be enough disambiguation for the geos so I have left those as is here as well. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the malformed template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also added WikiProjects in the template talk pages - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American state politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have a number of states with fairly large (greater than 650 articles) Foo members of State House Representatives stubs categories. We have already split Wisconsin by party so I propose we do the same here. All four look relatively evenly split by party, based on perm cats so I propose

Apologies for the mismatch in names, these are taken from the existing categories. By the way did someone recently mention long category names! 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chile politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Near oversized, I propose we split out the members of the Senate and Deputies of congress:

If anyone is more knowledgeable on Chilean politics (ie know absolutely anything) can you please check the proposed names of the template/category make sense. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the categories and templates, but could you please create talk pages for them using WikiProjects next time? If you're unsure of which ones to use, you can check the parent category's talk page or search for them if you have WP:RATER. Regardless, you've done a lot for the Stub sorting project! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Brazil politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Near oversized, I propose we split out the members of the Senate and Deputies of congress:

If anyone is more knowledgeable on Brazilian politics (ie know absolutely anything) can you please check the proposed names of the template/category make sense. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - sounds good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Russian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Getting oversized, I propose we split out the members of the State Duma

For this one I really don't like the template name but can't think of a better one Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian building and structure stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 articles contain the word "lighthouse" therefore I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1940s American film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, propose the following which should get it off the oversized list:

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't see anything wrong with it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2010s drama film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, the following are all viable subcats of this:

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; go for it! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More American politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Four states have politician stubs that are starting to get a bit large, I propose we split out the state level politicians as we have done in other states so:

Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saskatchewan politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700 articles, we seem to split out the MLA's first however that would create a category of over 600 so I propose the following set up:

I have followed the perm cats in the categorization of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation MLA's I presume ther has been a joining together or rename or something. Also if anyone has any say with the Saskatchewan party can you get them to change there name as it has given me headaches in trying to come up with a template name for them that follows the pattern of the other parties.Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian MLA splits

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Two Canadian provinces already have MLA splits over 600 and I would therefore like to propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s German silent film stubs subcategories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:1920s German silent film stubs is currently the largest stub category at 1485 pages, and therefore needs splitting into its individual years.

The split numbers actually add up to 1499 articles instead of 1485, which is a little strange. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 11:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We usually split up the film stubs by genre - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough - I don't know enough about film genres to be able to propose those, so if you have any suggestions, that would be appreciated. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 17:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, could you please add your signature (using four tildes) after each request? It makes it easier for people to reply and add more to the discussions. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What? If you're talking about the proposals above this one, I didn't post those. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 19:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I looked in the page history. It was @Waacstats. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, knew I had forgotten something. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking at this one myself and I think the following may be more useful:
There is some overlap but this should just about take it off the oversized list.Waacstats (talk) 18:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Saône-et-Loire geography stubs

[edit]

Split into separate templates, one for each Arrondissement:

Support only question is do we need a FR disambig on Mâcon to make sure people don't confuse it with Macon, Georgia, i know we already have the circumflex accent but just wandering, I have no strong thoughts either way. Waacstats (talk) 06:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think so, but this would benefit from more user input - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As there is no -geo- stub for Macon, Georgia, I think we should go ahead without the FR disambig. Her Pegship (?) 22:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HauteSaône-geo-stub is oversized

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{HauteSaône-geo-stub}} is a bit chubby, so I recommend splitting into separate templates:

Support, there is a town in Albania called Lure so I don't know if we need the FR disambig on the template given that the town only has 1000 inhabitants but it might be an idea, like above I have no strong thoughts either way, Waacstats (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Doubs geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
On today's episode of My 600-page Category, I found more templates and categories I'd like to propose:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:59, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Côte-d'Or geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Since this category is extra thicc, I'd like to propose:

I believe that the new categories will be able to hit the 60-transclusion requirement, even without potential false positives... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Districts of Republican Subordination geography stubs

[edit]

From the Tajikistan geography stubs category. I found over 120 articles that should get this new template, but I don't know what it should be called, since the name of the district is so long. Maybe {{DRS-geo-stub}}? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the idea, the best I can come up with is either {{RepublicanSubordination-geo-stub}} or we have seperate templates for each of the individual districts, hopfully someone else has a better idea. Waacstats (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The main article would be Districts under Central Government Jurisdiction, so would the template be called {{DCGJ-geo-stub}}? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I would use upmerged templates for specific districts of Tajikistan, as previously done, rather than trying to stub by region. Category:Tajikistan geography stubs has only 230 articles, which isn't oversized, really. Her Pegship (?) 22:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2010s Belgian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 70 articles waiting; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cant see any issues on this oneWaacstats (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Chinese film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Been doing some stub sorting with AWB (helps prevent carpel tunnel lmao), and I noticed that {{2000s-China-film-stub}} has over 90 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support AWB really does help. Waacstats (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Slovenian canoeist stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Slovenia-canoe-bio-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:09, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support another good catch. Waacstats (talk) 07:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Russian sailing biography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Russia-sailing-bio-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

support , I'm sure this wasn't over a couple of weeks ago. Waacstats (talk) 07:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has 65 of them, but I still created it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Pljevlja Municipality geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 150 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bijelo Polje Municipality geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 90 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support both splits as definitely time to split Montenegro (stub wise) again upmerged templates for other municipalities (dont know how many threre are)? Waacstats (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's only 25 so might be worth it. Waacstats (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did Petscan searches for all of the municipalities but only a select few deserved their own templates/cats - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Some cycling stub templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These should be found in Category:American cycling biography stubs:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the Belgian and French split we have tended to go with US-cycling-bio-[date]-stub rather than having the date first. Also on the other cycling bios we have split categories by century first so are you proposing an American cycling biography, 20th-century birth stubs with these as a child, if so I would go with all the decades in the 20th-century. Waacstats (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should create the new stubs for this one, since you've had more experience with sports biographies... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done and dusted, largest category there is now below 200. Waacstats (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merzifon District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are 71 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support also would the other districts be useful as uppmerged templates? and which way are we going with district templates in turkey, I'm seeing templates with District and some without? Waacstats (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Kayin State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Kayin-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support good spot. Waacstats (talk) 07:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Sughd Region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but with {{Sughd-geo-stub}} in mind; see here for the over 300 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Khatlon Region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Tajikistan-geo-stub}} is a bit oversized in my opinion; see here for the list of articles awaiting {{Khatlon-geo-stub}} and the new category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tajikistan was on my list to look at sometime soon, is it worth doing upmerged templates for any other regions? Waacstats (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Analamanga geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Analamanga-geo-stub}} has over 130 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

support Madagascar certainly needs a split. Waacstats (talk) 07:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2010s Sri Lankan film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 150 pages awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Sri Lankan film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 110 pages awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2020s Dutch film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are 60 articles waiting; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2010s Dutch film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Dutch film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages await the new template; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1990s Dutch film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1930s Polish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list. There are 61 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all the film categories above, these look good. Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Curling event stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 articles under curling stubs have championships in there title so this one should be viable, while a quick count suggests that the parent would not be left too badly undersized (about 50). Therefore I propose

Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports organization stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I will be looking at tiding up the sport org category, before doing so could I propose the following templates, potentially upmerged to fooian organisation stubs, fooian sport stubs and sport organization stubs. I feel that this category is currently under used and lots of sports organisations are lost in nation specific sport stub cats, sport specific cats, nation org stub cats and maybe even other places, this will help as otherwise we could be triple tagging articles. We already have a US category so these are feasible, but I will request just the following templates for the usual suspects when it comes to sport categories to see how things look before requesting categories and any further templates:

Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Myriapod stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, this subphylum has 4 classes, two of which should be easily viable for categories. I propose the following

I have used the titles of the articles, in the case of millipede(an FA) and Centipede(a GA) rather than the latin names as that seems to make sense, I have no objection to the creation of {{Diplopoda-stub}} and {{Chilopoda-stub}} as redirects. Although proposed the last two would have permcats with a total of 17 articles in them so I doubt will be needed just yet, but editors have been known to occasionally create a load of articles so I propose them just in case. Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cichlidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This family level split is just off the oversized list, we have two tribe level subcats and one genus level subcat, I can't find any obvious splits at these levels but the permcats also have subfamily splits which do give viable stub cats for the following which I would like to propose:

Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Football bio splits

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A number of countries have subcats that are starting to get large, I would like to split these before they get on the oversize list. IN each case the midfielder stub category is over 600 but if I recall correctly we normally split the defender, midfielder and forward categories by dob at the same time so I propose templates and where viable categories in the following formats for any decades requiring templates and the categories iff they reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jura (department) geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large, this department has only three arrondissements so should split nicely between the following proposed templated and categories:

I have not added France or Jura to the categories as I think France is about the only country to use Arrondissement and there appears to be no overlap so I think we are safe here. I added FR to Dole as there are a number of places in Wales, the former Yugoslavia, Nepal and to SaintClaude as there are places in US and Canada.Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, March 2025

[edit]

Speedys

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
this weeks list of potential speedys

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Swaziland / Eswatini

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We appear to have a number of templates that are named Swaziland-blah-stub, some are redirects to the Eswatini-blah stub which is not a problem however we also have some that are either the target of a redirected Eswatini-blah stub or there is no Eswatini-blah-stub. Unless there is a more complex system that we need to follow I propose the following:

1-Reversing the redirects on the following stubs:

2-Creating new Eswatini templates to have as targets for existing Swaziland templates where these don't already exist

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you also suggest we change the category names? (Currently Category:Swazi people stubs, etc.) and if so, to what? Her Pegship (?) 18:07, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking around Wikipedia, the term used for people from Eswatini is still Swazi (see Category:Swazi people) so I am not proposing changing those unless there are wider changes in Wikipedia. Waacstats (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My feeling is that we shouldn't deal with these within stub sorting, but in the wider context of all templates and cats related to Swaziland / Eswatini - that is, an all-encompassing WP:CFD. I note that Category:Eswatini exists, it was moved from Category:Swaziland in November 2018 (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 November 5); but it has Category:Swazi people as a subcat. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention demonyms. There are some categories that accept "foo-ian" or "foo-ese" and idk how that would apply to Swaziland/Eswatini... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I note from your link to Category:Swaziland moving to Category:Eswatini almost all categories were moved and further up the page the template categories were also moved. Looking through the template category, where a number of stub templates are missing, all the templates use the country name, Eswatini in this case, except the royal family where that tree uses the demonym in general, Swazi in this case. Both of these taken together seem to be the all-encompassing discussion on whether we should use Eswatini or Swaziland. Also a read of the Talk page for Eswatini Talk:Eswatini/Archive_3#h-Requested_move_24_October_2018-2018-10-24T12:35:00.000Z shows the discussion on this and a clarification on the demonym. Waacstats (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Following the above advice I have listed the above at CFD here if anyone wants to partake in the discussion there. Waacstats (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support stub templates/redirects per nom; leaving demonym discussion for another time. Her Pegship (?) 20:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

England athletics biographies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looks like some fool tried to clear out the British athletics bios and ended up putting this on the oversized list (That would be me, Sorry!), I would rather this split at British level but seen as we already have the home nations split best do it here, in line with US, France, Germany and the recent Japan, Russia and Canada splits I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support templates; categories to be determined by template numbers. Her Pegship (?) 20:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rajasthan geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Category is getting close to oversize we have one (undersized) by district subcat and two upmerged templates. I can't see any districts reaching threshold for there own categories so would like to propose the following by division system with the existing templates upmerged to the relevant district (and possibly the deletion of the existing category). Another option is to go with the by district templates and just upmerge these to the division categories, as we have already done in Utter Pradesh.

---divisions in lower case in cats matches Utter Pradesh, should we use CamelCase in the templates to make it clearer? Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dagestan geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized by a long way. No idea how many of these if any will be viable as the permcat categorization seems poor. Obviously templates first, categories for any that reach 60. Also how on earth is Dagestan so well covered by stubs yet the other parts of the North Caucauses have so few stubs (rhetorical question)

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kentucky geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Another oversized geo stub, can't find any individual counties that are over the threshold but this article Western Coal Field seems to produce a viable group if we take the 10 counties wholly in this region this should take out 150 articles, enough for a category and enough to remove it from the oversized list. Given that I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rugby union bios

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A number of these categories are creeping up to close to oversize, to keep them off the list I propose splitting by decade of birth, as we do with NZ, as the rugby union fans here don't seem to have categorized by position unlike their association football brethren: therefore I propose templates and where they reach 60 categories in the following format for any decades that we need for each country listed below (sorry didn't fancy taking up even more room with probably 15 lines per country:

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just now catching up; is it too late to suggest "England-rugbyunion-bio-[date]-stub" to follow format for other rugby union stubs? Her Pegship (?) 20:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see that's already been adopted. Carry on! Her Pegship (?) 21:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American television film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Over 750 articles, petscan suggests here that 130 of these are comedies so I will propose the following to stop it getting on the oversized list:

Waacstats (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1920s German silent film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are over 1,000 articles that deserve this new category and template; see here and here for the long lists of articles... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support all the film categories below, just on this one be careful because 1920s would be the first decade with any "Talkie" films so the vast majority of films in the 1920s would be silent and may not prove that useful a split (note this is not an against more of a qualified support). Waacstats (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually ignore that last bit, we have the same with other 1920s silent film categories so precedent has been set. Waacstats (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1920s Italian silent film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 100 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1910s Italian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 110 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Finnish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 70 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Turkish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 90 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Turkish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 70 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Israeli film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 60 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1920s Austrian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 100 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1930s Austrian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 60 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1950s Austrian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (110 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Norwegian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 60 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1980s Philippine film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 70 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1990s Philippine film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 120 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Philippine film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 70 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Philippine film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list (over 100 articles) awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Lithuania geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
After a good sorting taking it down from close to 800, I would like to propose the following templates get categories, all have over 60 transclusions and the Alytus County one would already have a subcat

Waacstats (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support :) - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1970s Danish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{1970s-Denmark-film-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Supoprt this and all the film stubs below, they look good to me. Waacstats (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Danish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2010s-Denmark-film-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s Danish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2000s-Denmark-film-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1910s Hungarian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{1910s-Hungary-film-stub}}; there are 80 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1930s Hungarian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{1930s-Hungary-film-stub}}; there are over 100 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1940s Hungarian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{1940s-Hungary-film-stub}}; there are over 60 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1950s Hungarian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{1950s-Hungary-film-stub}}; there are over 60 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s South Korean film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{2010s-SouthKorea-film-stub}}; there are 190 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1990s South Korean film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{1990s-SouthKorea-film-stub}}; there are over 80 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s South Korean film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making {{2000s-SouthKorea-film-stub}}; there are over 100 articles awaiting the new template; see here for the full list - OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1950s Danish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{1950s-Denmark-film-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1960s Danish film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{1960s-Denmark-film-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crocodylomorpha stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Archosaur stubs contains over 200 articles, and a large portion of them are about crocodylomorphs. So I suggest creating a new stub template and category for that group.

—Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 19:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not my area of expertise but everything looks good here so support. Waacstats (talk) 15:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

National athletics bios

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Japanese, Russian and Canadian categories are creeping up, I would like to split out in a similar manner to US, France and Germany, the racewalker category may have to change as there is a speedy rename notice to race walker so I propose we go with which ever is the winner of that discussion, not all these will be sizeable enough for a category so templates first and categories iff they reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split cycling race stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not yet oversized but certainly creeping up, I propose the following:

I believe the dutch template will pass 60, while the others will fall short but propose catgegories just incase a few more are hiding somewhere,especially as Switzerland would have two existing subcats.Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Silent film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created as revised.
Petscan suggests 715 of the articles in the Silent American Western (genre) films category have a Silent-film-stub template on them, even if this proves to be out by a bit this should get the Silent films category off the oversized list so I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1930s German film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Sticking with films, this is only just short of being on the oversized list, again petscan suggests that the comedy films would make up nearly half of them )looks like me and OpalYosutebito had the same ideas) so I suggest

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; go for it :D - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phaegopterina stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Our largest category, the only subcat of its parent company that has over 60 articles and doesn't already hav a stub cat has 65 articles all of which are stubs apparently, this isn't enough to get it off the oversized list, but might be enough to take it off top spot. Therefore I propose

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Utah Registered Historic Places stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Category is at over 700, propose by county split (fortunatly this state only has a few), if petscan is to be believed then only Utah and SaltLake will end up with categories, but just incase some one makes the missing articles in the meantime I propose the following with templates to be created first then categories for those large enough:

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

College football season splits

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We've split most of the other by decade categories down by year and we still have two that have over 600 articles. I know not all of these categories will be viable but propose them along with templates to create whichever categories are viable:

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Noctuinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Hanging around on the bottom of / near the oversized list. Looks like the Apameini tribe could take 90 articles and 1 subcat therefore I propose

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedys

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Templates that have passt 60 and are ready for a caategory

Waacstats (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1950s German comedy film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
1950s German film stubs is getting pretty big, so I propose making {{1950s-Germany-comedy-film-stub}}, whose other parent category will be 1950s comedy film stubs. See here for the full list of pages awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1950s French comedy film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
1950s French film stubs is getting pretty big, so I propose making {{1950s-France-comedy-film-stub}}, whose other parent category will be 1950s comedy film stubs. See here for the full list of pages awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:1920s American silent comedy film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{1920s-US-silent-comedy-film-stub}} - I propose making this a subcategory of 1920s American film stubs and 1920s silent comedy film stubs; see here for the list of articles awaiting the new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support can't see any issues with this one. One comment on your petscan search if you change the level from 0 to 1 it gives the category and its direct subcats, change it to two and that adds the subcats of the subcats, so you dont need to list the category 4 times, once with out the | and once with |1,|2 and |3 you can just change the depth to 3.(Hope that makes sense and helps). Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the feedback. Is the stub title too long or does it break MOS in any way? This was my first time proposing a new silent comedy film category - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:51, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nepal road stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Nepal-road-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Perm Krai river stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of pages (approx. 120 of them); these use {{PermKrai-geo-stub}} and {{Russia-river-stub}}, whose categories are a bit large... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support keeps them off the list. Waacstats (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I'll get to work on this tomorrow morning - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ormož geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Ormož-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support matches other subcat in format. Waacstats (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Kaduna State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Kaduna-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support again matches all the other State level categories. Waacstats (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Northern Mindanao geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{NMindanao-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support first look at the parent I thought what a mess, some are Regions, some are not, but then looked at the parent category and that is the mess we have to follow and this continues that (in the tidiest way possible). Waacstats (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Zambian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Zambia-politician-stub}} has 78 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as long as you dont mind me hijacking this with a suggestion for the Botswana politician stubs which is even large at 82 ( and dont forget on the Zambians we have an used mayor template). Waacstats (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll propose that one too - OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Novo Goražde geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{NovoGoražde-geo-stub}} has 63 transclusions, and its parent category looks pretty big to me... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good Waacstats (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1940s American film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
340 of these are also under comedy films, plenty for a category even allowing for some false positives, this wont clear it off the oversized list but would make a good start

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; both of these sound great! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1950s American film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
120 of these are also under comedy films, plenty for a category even allowing for some false positives, this should clear it off the oversized list or at least make a good start, depending on how many false positives there are.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canada island stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
bubbling under at over 780 stubs. Propose splitting this by province, I believe the Nunavut subcats and British Columbia will probably take the vast majority of these and leave the parent around 80 but in case any other province reaches 60 I will propose all categories and templates but categories only to be created if the templates pass 60.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe try "PEI-island-stub"? Or "PrinceEdward-island-stub"? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking more of the category m=name than the template name, but looking at it that might not be a problem. Waacstats (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Until we need to form the category name, I think {{PrinceEdwardIsland-island-stub}} would be fine; it corresponds to other PEI geo stub names.Her Pegship (?) 19:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian cycling team stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
85 articles that could use the following

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A tidy up of sports teams

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A number of countries have enough articles tagged foo-sport-stub and bar-team-stub to make the foo-sport-team-stub and category viable add to that existing potential subcats like footyclub, waterpolo-team etc

The following template exists and is passed 60:

The following countries have at least 40 articles and for the sake of helping to count in the future I propse the following templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Various speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
these existing templates all have over 60 transclusions, propose categories for them all.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom :D - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vietnamese railway station stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Vietnam-railstation-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Islands District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

North District, Hong Kong geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sai Kung District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:09, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Yuen Long District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tai Po District geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all these look speedy eligible to me. Waacstats (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Waacstats good to know! I'm going to start creating the templates. I'll let you know if I need any more help - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
UPmerged templates with more than 60 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US women football biography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Category is starting to get large, propose we split same as we have with the general footy-bio-stubs ie by position:

Once done with this, depending on how many it takes out of the US-footy-position stub cats it may be worth while splitting the usual three by decade of birth as they are also creeping up.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

19th Century Paintings

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Currently oversized, perm cat is further split by decade, i propose the same here

obviously categories only if the templates pass 60, but I think they all should do. Once this is off the list it might again be worth looking at some of the other by century painting stubs for the same treatment as they are slowly getting larger.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Greek Mythology stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Greek myths are currently overrsized, according to petscan over 100 of these are Kings, even taking into account false positives there will definitly be plenty of articles on Kings, Queens, Princes and Princesses for the following which I propose as an initial split:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American film biography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Currently oversized, Petscan is showing enough article for each of the following:

Obviously templates first, just in case of falses positives on my count, then templates if and when they reach 60.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
currently oversized, we have two by party splits but no other party perm cat has enough articles for a stub category, even if all the articles were stubs. Propose we split out all the politicians who served in the polish parliament, the Sejm. I'm not that happy with the name if anyone can come up with a better idea

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Estonian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
1200 articles, I propose we split out the parliamentary politicians, this is likely to be over 800 its self so propose sub cats by parliamentary year, templates first then categories once they are over 60

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Basketball team stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
There is a large overlap between the European basketball team stubs (over 600 articles) and National basketball team stubs (over 400 articles), therefore I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Handball club stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category has over 500 articles, a large number are for various national teams I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Handball stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
59 of these articles are for national federations, by the time we add the existing clubs category as a potential subcat (in the permcats it comes under handball directly and under handball organisations) we should be sizeable enough to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

16th-century English MPs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create templates, cats as needed.
Significantly oversized, we already have two sub cats basaed on which parliament they sat in , propose continuing this with a few more, the names are based on the existing sub cats categories and the permenant categories.If anyone can come up with better names for the 1953 and 1954 categories as I think these are a bit of a mess as I have propsed them:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missouri River stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Doesn't look like any counties are going to be breaking out of this massively oversized category any time soon, So I propose following the Missouri geography stubs split, hopefully I have cut and paste the Missouri split right but given how many templates there are here I would appreciate anyone giving it an extra check:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Raebareli district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Raebareli-geo-stub}} has over 350 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.Waacstats (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Unnao district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Unnao-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ladakh geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Ladakh-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nagaland geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Nagaland-geo-stub}} has over 80 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Purba Mednipur geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{PurbaMedinipur-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions and Category:West Bengal geography stubs is oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the other subcats have district in the title, I assume this one should have it aswell. Waacstats (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy footballers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
The follwing templates all have 0ver 60 pages, propose the relevant categories:

Note that the Brazilian forwards born in 1950s only has 37 articles so not proposing yet, unless anyone thinks we should for continuity of categories. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

English goalkeepers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Parent category is a little bit large and we have already split out two decades, I propose the following templates with categories for any over 60

I think 1890,1900 and 1940 will end up with categories but lets see once everything is sorted. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
We have 3 oversized categories( Florida, Minnesota and New Hampshire). Based on other states (OH and NY) I propose splitting out those that served in the various state legislatures, ( a quick look using petscan suggests a big enough overlap in at least two of these states so that we could have a category for those that served in both houses, but I am not going down that road)

I believe that the Representatives categories will still be over 700 but we will hopefully be able to see better what we have after sorting. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States Supreme court stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, I can see two ways of splitting this from the perm cat's subcats, either by decade(not widely used) or by the court that heard it it therefore propose splitting this by the court with the following templates and categories where these pass 60, Being neither an American nor an expert on this field I am open to changin this to by year/decade if people see that as a better fit:

Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is necessary, TBH. The SCOTUS-stub category is not "overstuffed"; there are a lot of cases. We should only subcategorize the stub if we foresee people actually doing work based on the subcategorization. I find it difficult to believe someone would sit down and go "It is my goal to make sure the Hughes Court's cases do not have stubs." Additionally, someone interested in such a project could just use Category Intersection to achieve this. No need to write it into templates. But, hypothetically, if we were to do this, it should not be a separate template for each justice. It should be {{SCOTUS-stub|Roberts}}, {{SCOTUS-stub|Hughes}}, etc. lethargilistic (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how that would be implemented based on the stub sorter extension I use (see my JavaScript for further details) - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well, if there's a technical limitation, then disregard that suggestion. I'm still skeptical of the value of this initiative, but I suppose it's ultimately harmless. lethargilistic (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Haryana railway station stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Haryana-railstation-stub}} has 60 transclusions, and Indian railway station stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of the transclusions is from its own talk page, which makes 59; but Support because of the existing category tree. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't say the parent is anywhere near oversized but this fits the system. Waacstats (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=1291468340"