... that Welwitschia mirabilis only ever grows two leaves, which last for the plant's entire life?
This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old, or significantly expanded beyond 1000 characters in the last 5 days.
When you add an image to DYK, you must protect it and add {{mprotected}} to the image description page, or {{C-uploaded}} if you have uploaded a temporary copy from Commons.
Attempt to have items from different fields of interest in an update.
Please disambiguate linked words in the suggestion.
Try to ensure entries are of appropriate length and make them more interesting, if possible.
Stale entries are no fun, but please try to give every entry the exposure it deserves.
List new suggestions here, at the bottom of the date the article was created (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If there's a suitable image, place it after the suggestion.
Remember:
Proposed articles should be over 1000 characters, and no more than 5 days old (unless it was under 1000 characters)
Suggested facts should be:
Interesting to draw in a variety of readers.
Short and pithy (under about 200 characters).
Neutral.
Definite facts, mentioned in the article.
June 15
Latest comment: 18 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
The article does make this claim but it's a bit buried in the lead and then not really referred to again. Was it really this series that did it? Why? The cite supporting the claim just gives a resource, not a more explicatory support. Could either of those things be addressed? The hook itself could be a bit more punchy, as this is an important idea... the dominance by HP of this market was remarkable, in my view. Hope that helps (and yes, LJ4s are well nigh indestructable and still are a good value used if got cheaply enough) ++Lar: t/c18:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's a nice article for a successful and popular model, but the hook here is really dodgy, as it was the LaserJet Series II that established their market dominance. First printer to use the Bitronics interface? To use the Canon EX engine? --Dhartung | Talk07:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
The cite that Lar did mention that as HP now had the laserjet 4 series ranging from personal printers (4L) to high end (4Si) and graphics (4V) it now had market leading laser printers in all segments of the market. However finding additional cites is difficult as all you can google is adverts. Additionally looking at the history of laerjets seem to show that HP from the beginning were building very popular lasers. I'll try and find some more cites, but Dhartung's point that a different hook might be better. An example could be with the Bitronics example as That Hewlett Packard's popular LaserJet 4 range of printers were the first HP printers with the bi-directional Bitronics interface? or ending with first HP printers with bi-directional communications, allowing printers and PCs on a network to communicate with each other? Just suggestions. The EX engine was only used in the LJ4/4+ and none of the other variants. Tell me what you think. Making these things up is hard... - Master Of Ninja08:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually one other interesting bit of information could be That Hewlett Packard's popular LaserJet 4 range of printers included the LaserJet 4LC, the first printer designed exclusively for the Chinese market? - an interesting fact from Hewlett Packard's own information archives - Master Of Ninja09:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
There are some previous deleted revisions, but they had been wiped out and converted into a redirect, so I hope this can be treated as a new article. Also I hope no one minds two closely related DYKs in the short span of two days. :p Elle vécut heureuseà jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 23:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Can you reduce the length of the fact, or supply another interesting fact? — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-13 23:11
May be like that:
...that on the coat of arms of Greenland despite the heraldic tradition in raising the right forepaw, the polar bear raises the left forepaw because real polar bears are left-handed?
...that Epiphanius's most important work, the Panarion, is ironically the only surviving source of information on several early Christiansects that he sought to eliminate with his writing? (self-nom) — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-13 01:41
I asked a few others to be sure this was irony. I received only agreement, and the best-worded response I received was: "Yes, Epiphanius meant to stamp out heresy, and instead gave it a longer life." — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-13 01:57
Seems to be an import from Catholic Encyclopaedia. If this stuff was really written a full century ago, it is too stale to be featured in DYK. --Ghirla-????-12:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
It wasn't simply an "import", I had to clean up the wording/style/grammar, and it incorporates content from other places. And the content certainly has not become "stale", because the subject is from the 4th century. I'm not finished with the article; I've simply laid the foundation. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-13 15:15
It is ironic, although it's not actually unusual (much of the info for performance practice of early music comes from criticisms), and I wouldn't say it's stale, I think it's pretty interesting. Mak(talk)18:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
The articles needs sources and categories, and the Physical Therapy article is pretty short. Can you expand it? Are there any other interesting facts that could be used here? — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-13 23:08
I added some, but all of them are in Hungarian, since it's impossible to find info about it in English (the WP article is probably the first). BTW thanks for cleaning up in the article. I'd love to see it in the DYK :) – Alensha??21:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
references in foreign languages are fin when tnere are none in English, but an article without any has no chance at DYK. Circeus22:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Should it be "features a small artificial waterfall" or "features small artificial waterfalls"? i.e. is one waterfall or several? Mak(talk)18:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
DYK can only accept newly-created articles. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-12 16:49
I expanded the Gregorian chant article substantially on 6/9/06 [1]and on 6/11/06 [2]. What criteria for "substantial expansion" do these changes fail to meet? Also, why must the article be newly created? At the top of the page, it says, "Only articles that were created or significantly expanded in the last 5 days are eligible for use." If this isn't accurate, someone should change that line... Peirigill16:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
The criterion is that the article was a stub beforehand, and was expanded beyond a stub. Your article was already large beforehand. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-12 17:06
Optionally, move nominations here, along with the users' signatures, for later informing. Then, individually copy each question into the template. (not all updaters use this so do not read anything into absence of items here, go by the update warning box)
Instructions to admins
Add the following templates to their respective places:
...that the prosecution of writer and poet Perihan Magden for urging defiance of mandatory military service has complicated Turkey's negotiations for membership in the European Union?
...that the legendary Tamil stage and film artiste K. B. Sundarambal was also a political activist, and the first film personality to enter an Indian state legislature?
...that New York Times theater critic Howard Taubman said, "it is the destiny of the theatre nearly everywhere and in every period to struggle even when it is flourishing"?
...that due to protests and financial problems, the Saint Petersburg Dam was one of the Soviet Union's most notorious long-term construction projects?