Jump to content

Talk:Bini (group)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeBini (group) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 29, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
November 30, 2024Peer reviewNot reviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Bini's Cultural Impact

[edit]

Hello, everyone!

I'm asking if this is suitable for Cultural impact section? Walo Hanggang Dulo: The Heartfelt Evolution of BINI’s Growing Fandom, The Blooms ROY is WAR Talk! 02:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So far I think the NGOs deserve a mention at least. Borgenland (talk) 04:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shagidi

[edit]

Hello, everyone!

I have a draft article of the upcoming single Shagidi. All of your edits and contributes are welcome. ROY is WAR Talk! 07:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

X and YouTube account

[edit]

Hello!

I am adding some modules on the infobox of Bini, I added the X account. However, I want to add the YouTube account of Bini but I don't know if when hit 100K subscribers of their official account. Also, i will add their X account of individual members.

ROY is WAR Talk! 05:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe these are necessary, as they're not typically included in musical group BLPs like this one. According to the template's documentation, this infobox is intended to be used in articles about individuals or organizations who are known primarily for their presence or work on X. However, Bini is not primarily known for their content or activity on that platform, but rather uses it as a social media outlet. Like many popular entities, they maintain a presence across various social media platforms, which is standard.
That's just my opinion though, I don't know what the other editors think about this. AstrooKai (Talk) 08:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Same as Astro but with WP:FANCRUFT grounds. Borgenland (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also with the FANCRUFT grounds (forgot to include it). The information about their social media statistics may only concern their fans, not the general population (readers) as a whole. AstrooKai (Talk) 13:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe that it's not necessary for the group page. It's more for people who are committed content creators/influencers. Bloomagiliw (talk) 13:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article became Good Article and Former Good Article at the same time?

[edit]

On the top page, there is a notice saying: Bini (group) is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by ROY is WAR Talk! at 06:42, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But on below is a former Good article nominee, i'm so confused that if this article was a good article or not, pls fix. ArtopiaBoy (talk) 01:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is the second nomination for reassessment of this article. ROY is WAR Talk! 01:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article was nominated previously but failed, which is why it’s marked as a former Good Article nominee. It is now being renominated, so the top tag shows it’s a nominee again. AstrooKai (Talk) 03:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]