Talk:Moose test

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diagram is wrong

As I understand it there should also be a line of cones up the left hand side of the diagram. Greglocock (talk) 03:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

as seen here https://static.bonniernews.se/images/1b/0d/1b0d77c329234a20be91d0fc2c171c22/annan/[email protected]

Greglocock (talk) 03:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The end result is the same though? I think it's more that the one used in the article is simplified - but I wouldn't be averse to changing it for a freely available more accurate/specific diagram. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you could pass the test shown in the diagram by driving off the LHS of the page. That is a fail. Greglocock (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Worst car

To clarify my reversion - the Rialto is by far the worst at 42.5Kph, and after that the slowest is a three-way tie between the Ford Ranger Double Cab XLT Limited, Mazda BT-50 Double Cab Exclusive and the Citroën C4 Picasso HDi all at 54Kph.

That the Mazda and Ford have the same result isn't much of a surprise as they both share the Ford T6 platform, but they're distinct vehicles so each get an entry. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:22, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The rialto has one wheel less. Hence is much more likely to tip over. Greglocock (talk) 22:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename current champion section

I suggest "Cherry picked examples" Greglocock (talk) 22:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - once again, I believe you to be pointy and borderline disruptive by suggesting such an obviously provocative heading. The first, last and 26-year record holder are not "cherry picked examples". A "cherry picked example" would be something like the Citroën C4 Picasso HDi when it was not the slowest vehicle, but also shared its speed with two others - and also performed the test in damp conditions, (unlike the two others sharing the same speed) making it more likely to perform poorly in the first place. Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
1