User talk:Compenze

This is Compenze's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: DUXIANA (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DUXIANA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Compenze! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DUXIANA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DUXIANA, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DUXIANA has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DUXIANA. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DUXIANA (January 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: blatant advertising.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DUXIANA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DUXIANA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 09:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duxiana (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duxiana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account?

Hi, did you previously edit with username DUXIANA? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duxiana (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duxiana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Compenze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked due to concerns of sockpuppetry and promotional editing. I am new to Wikipedia and was genuinely trying to learn how to contribute properly, specifically while exploring how to write a page about a company. I now realise that my approach was not aligned with Wikipedia's standards, especially in relation to neutral tone, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.

I did not intend to mislead or evade policies, and I apologise if my actions gave that impression. I have since reviewed the relevant guidelines on sockpuppetry, paid editing, and article creation. I would very much like the opportunity to contribute constructively going forward—focused on neutral, well-sourced, and community-appropriate content.

If unblocked, I will strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies, disclose any affiliations where required, and avoid editing topics where there may be a conflict of interest. I appreciate your time in reviewing this and hope for a chance to demonstrate my commitment to editing constructively. Compenze (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that my account was blocked due to concerns of sockpuppetry and promotional editing. I am new to Wikipedia and was genuinely trying to learn how to contribute properly, specifically while exploring how to write a page about a company. I now realise that my approach was not aligned with Wikipedia's standards, especially in relation to neutral tone, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.
:I did not intend to mislead or evade policies, and I apologise if my actions gave that impression. I have since reviewed the relevant guidelines on sockpuppetry, paid editing, and article creation. I would very much like the opportunity to contribute constructively going forward—focused on neutral, well-sourced, and community-appropriate content.
:If unblocked, I will strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies, disclose any affiliations where required, and avoid editing topics where there may be a conflict of interest. I appreciate your time in reviewing this and hope for a chance to demonstrate my commitment to editing constructively. [[User:Compenze|Compenze]] ([[User talk:Compenze#top|talk]]) 11:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my account was blocked due to concerns of sockpuppetry and promotional editing. I am new to Wikipedia and was genuinely trying to learn how to contribute properly, specifically while exploring how to write a page about a company. I now realise that my approach was not aligned with Wikipedia's standards, especially in relation to neutral tone, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.
:I did not intend to mislead or evade policies, and I apologise if my actions gave that impression. I have since reviewed the relevant guidelines on sockpuppetry, paid editing, and article creation. I would very much like the opportunity to contribute constructively going forward—focused on neutral, well-sourced, and community-appropriate content.
:If unblocked, I will strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies, disclose any affiliations where required, and avoid editing topics where there may be a conflict of interest. I appreciate your time in reviewing this and hope for a chance to demonstrate my commitment to editing constructively. [[User:Compenze|Compenze]] ([[User talk:Compenze#top|talk]]) 11:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my account was blocked due to concerns of sockpuppetry and promotional editing. I am new to Wikipedia and was genuinely trying to learn how to contribute properly, specifically while exploring how to write a page about a company. I now realise that my approach was not aligned with Wikipedia's standards, especially in relation to neutral tone, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.
:I did not intend to mislead or evade policies, and I apologise if my actions gave that impression. I have since reviewed the relevant guidelines on sockpuppetry, paid editing, and article creation. I would very much like the opportunity to contribute constructively going forward—focused on neutral, well-sourced, and community-appropriate content.
:If unblocked, I will strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies, disclose any affiliations where required, and avoid editing topics where there may be a conflict of interest. I appreciate your time in reviewing this and hope for a chance to demonstrate my commitment to editing constructively. [[User:Compenze|Compenze]] ([[User talk:Compenze#top|talk]]) 11:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Compenze (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you previously use to edit with the DUXIANA account? I already asked this a few months ago, but you never replied. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry I am not sure what you mean, is there a separate account called DUXIANA? Im not sure if I have done the settings for the account correct? Compenze (talk) 12:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed there is. It was blocked in Feb-2024, and a few days after that you registered this Compenze account. Both accounts are singularly interested in promoting the Duxiana brand. I have therefore concluded that you likely are either the same user, or possibly colleagues/acquaintances, and have accordingly blocked this account also as a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of DUXIANA.

Another administrator will come to review the block at some point. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I wasn’t aware of the previous account activity - apologies for any confusion. I’m new to Wikipedia and have recently taken over this task from a colleague, with the aim of creating a page about DUXIANA. While I’m not employed directly by DUXIANA, I work for a marketing agency supporting them.

I want to ensure that any contributions I make fully comply with Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and editing policies. Could you please advise on the best way for me to proceed with submitting a draft article in a transparent and appropriate way? Compenze (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I will note that your unblock request appears to have been written by an AI tool (100% according to ZeroGPT). Appeals written by AI are not accepted.

Please also be aware that Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duxiana (June 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

CoconutOctopus talk 10:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]