User talk:NormalStatisticalAnomaly

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:10, Wednesday, September 27, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:12, Wednesday, September 27, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome!

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! RotciW (TᴳRᴴAᴼIˢNᵀ) 01:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome! I'm excited to get started. NormalStatisticalAnomaly (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me, I will make a point of including edit summaries to explain changes to the encyclopedia. NormalStatisticalAnomaly (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on Alligator Lake (North Carolina). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a blessed day as well! Thank you for the work you do curating the encyclopedia. NormalStatisticalAnomaly (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on North Fork Reservoir. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on Beaver Lake (North Carolina). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on Pungo Lake. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on Lake Julian (North Carolina). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jane Helwig

Hello, NormalStatisticalAnomaly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jane Helwig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Helwig has been accepted

Jane Helwig, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly. Thank you for your work on The Mascot (book). Another editor, Mwwv, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

While I don't think the overview needs to be cited, I feel like with the amount of content the sources have it would be for the best to cite it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mwwv}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

mwwv ^converse∫_edits 21:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mwwv, I just came across this while checking up on the AP suggestion at WP:PERM - just fyi, the overview of a book in a book article generally doesn't need footnotes, as the source of the information is self-evidently the book itself. For some books this can get tricky, but it doesn't look like this is one of them. -- asilvering (talk) 03:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright, I'll be sure to keep that in mind for my future patrols. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 04:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi NormalStatisticalAnomaly, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! asilvering (talk) 03:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Asilvering! I'll make sure to edit responsibly and maintain a high standard for page creation. NormalStatisticalAnomaly (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]