Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GR8 Tech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. per keep argumens, newly added sigcov, WP HEY (non-admin closure) Cinder painter (talk) 06:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GR8 Tech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable gambling company, sourced mostly with WP:TRADES. Fails WP:NCORP. Gheus (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Cyprus. Shellwood (talk) 10:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Technology, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, in reality that is a notable and big firm in its gambling field with a shady past and interesting details. The notability derives from the sourcing in gambling related newspapers online, and also from the sanctioned parimatch/tech(previous name changed to avoid sanctions and ties with suspicious organisations). Such sigcov link tell a lot about shadow activities [1], here [2] and others. The page should be rebalanced though. Norlk (talk) 13:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP BEFORE. the company rebranded (to avoid some questions) but still has multiple in-depth coverage on government investigations, on activities descriptions by the local Forbes magazine (not found on wiki current version https://forbes.ua/innovations/it-kompaniya-z-kholdingu-parimatch-vtratila-naybilshogo-klienta-y-levovu-chastku-vitorgu-na-chomu-vona-zaroblyae-i-yaki-varianti-e-u-menedzhmentu-20032023-12448), and Dev.ua media constant coverage https://dev.ua/news/sbu-do-parimatch-tech-nalezhat-kompanii-stvoreni-hromadianamy-rf-kompaniia-vkhodyt-v-diia-city-1682411170, https://dev.ua/news/my-zviazalysia-z-gr8-tech-eks-parimatch-tech-i-zapytaly-pro-sytuatsiiu-z-parimatch-os-shcho-nam-rozpovily-1678777761, https://dev.ua/news/parimatch-tech and many other, including Ukrinform https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-sports/3362303-parimatch-tech-kupue-onlajnpokerrum-pokermatch.html, which estimates it as a $billion company. Amlikdi (talk) 07:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per new relialbe sources with significant coverage. Classic WP HEY. Linkusyr (talk) 12:00, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep: While all source can’t be notable enough, few sources are secondary and article meets the minimum to be included on the platform Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 14:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NCORP. The sources are not really that good and notability is not clear. Page reads like a promo for the company. Ramos1990 (talk) 03:37, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.