Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Emceet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Doug Bell ^talk 19:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Emceet

Wikipedia is not myspace. User has made one edit, which was to this page, and has been inactive since last May. MER-C 09:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I tried to think of something to add, but that's it. Yomangani ^talk 09:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Need a speedy deletion criteria to cover these abandoned user pages. —Doug Bell ^talk 10:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note that we can now use WP:PROD for such cases as these. (Radiant) 10:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Great, but you're an hour too late for this nomination! MER-C 11:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I know :) it just seemed like a reasonable spot for advertising a new alternative. I didn't mean to speak up against you, just to inform the MFD regulars. (Radiant) 11:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's strange, since the page seems to emphasize "articels", or does that cover "articels" in userspace? 68.39.174.238 17:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom.__Seadog^♪ 13:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. • s d 3 1 4 1 5 talk · contribs • 17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Mailer Diablo 03:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Fred McGarry 10:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.