Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Food and drink

Brewing equipment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is redundant with the Beer and Brewing articles. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 17:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 17:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete besides the above, the article really doesn't say anything. Mangoe (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jigger & Pony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable location only mentioned once in The World's 50 Best Bars. Frank_{(has DemoCracy DeprivaTion)} 12:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Can't find any other secondary sources that covers the subject. Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 12:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Do NOT make "articles" with just seven words, even if listed in some random private organization's rankings. This isn't an "unnecessary deletion nomination" if it means something will actually be written, but this is in no state for mainspace just to state its existence or that it has a ranking. Reywas92^Talk 16:46, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KFC Snacker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable food item. Contains obvious SYNTH/OR (one person in the talk suggests it's written by AI) and reads more like advertising than an encyclopedia article. Macktheknifeau (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Macktheknifeau (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep: Source 2 is fine, another discussion of the sandwich here [1] and a brief discussion here [2] Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Hoffman, Ken (2006-10-06). "KFC adds another Snacker to roster". The Birmingham News. Archived from the original on 2025-06-16. Retrieved 2025-06-16 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: "KFC Snackers are a big hit because they're small and inexpensive, and you can order exactly how many it'll take to fill you. It's the ultimate portion control. Me, I need three of them. Suddenly, it's not so cheap, but it's still a good deal because three small Snackers are more bang (and food) for your buck than one big chicken sandwich. A Snacker is about five bites. Or three, if you're eating alone and nobody's watch-ing. Or one, if you're in a competitive-eating contest on ESPN. The chicken strips are double-breaded in the Colonel's "extra crispy" breading. They're double-breaded because once is not enough... carbs. The strips are fried superfast, so the breading is crispy and the chicken is still moist and tender in-side."
2. Hoffman, Ken (2005-03-03). "KFC's tiny Snacker is big on taste". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2025-06-16. Retrieved 2025-06-16.
  The article notes: "There is also a Honey BBQ Snacker with extra gooey stuff but less fat and fewer calories. With two Snackers, and more in research and development, this is KFC's biggest sandwich rollout since 1999 when the world's biggest chicken chain introduced five upscale, two-fisted sandwiches with fanciful names like Triple Crunch Zinger and Honey BBQ Melt. They also had a two-fisted price, $2.99. ... Snackers are fine — they hit the bull's-eye for taste. KFC's extra-crispy strips are crunchy, loud and glistening straight from the fryer. They're all white meat and high-end stuff."
3. MacArthur, Kate (2005-11-07). "KFC Snacker". Advertising Age. Vol. 76, no. 45. p. S-14. EBSCOhost 18839801. ProQuest 208376576.
  The article notes: "Scott Bergren HAS been exec VP-marketing for KFC since mid-2003, but after selling more than 100 million KFC Snacker sandwiches in six months, he has a new name: Mr. Snacker., Starting with a 10% same-store sales boost in its first month, the Snacker has helped rocket sales out of a nearly two-year abyss and reacquaint customers with the finger-lickin' brand as it gears up a reprisal of its original Kentucky Fried heritage. Since March, sales' gains have remained in the mid- to high-single digits, drawing women and lunch customers."
4. Glazer, Fern (2007-02-12). "Diners may diet less, but operators still push healthful options". Nation's Restaurant News. Vol. 41, no. 7. p. 18. ProQuest 229367443.
  The article notes: "In February 2005, Louisville, Ky.-based KFC introduced a pared-down chicken sandwich called the KFC Snacker, which features a breaded chicken strip topped with lettuce and pepper mayonnaise and served on a warm sesame seed bun. The Snacker, which is a smaller version of the chain's Double Crunch sandwich, is about half the size of that item and has 200 fewer calories. Despite its name, the Snacker, which comes in varieties such as Crispy Snacker, Honey BBQ Snacker, Buffalo Snacker and Ultimate Cheese Snacker, is most popular during the lunch daypart. According to the chain, 56 percent of Snackers are sold during lunch."
5. Schreiner, Bruce (2005-05-20). "KFC Snacker, New Bucket Get Sales Sizzlin'". The Ledger. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2025-06-16. Retrieved 2025-06-16.
  The article notes: "The Louisville-based chicken chain credits its triple-divided variety bucket and the 99-cent Snacker sandwich for helping spark its most sustained sales growth in three years. ... Bear Stearns & Co. restaurant industry analyst Joe Buckley said the sandwich gave KFC a belated share of the fast-food industry's value-priced market. "Prior to this, they've really struggled to get to that price point," he said, adding, "It was always easier for the hamburger operators to do something on 99 cents than KFC.""
6. Tauber, Chris; James, Tom (2005-03-26). "The Lunch Guys: Why did the chicken cross the road? To get a $1 Checkers spicy sandwich". The Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on 2025-06-16. Retrieved 2025-06-16 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: "The KFC and McD's counterparts were weak in comparison. When I pulled out my KFC Snacker, thought either I had grown to giant size or someone had pointed a shrinking ray at this sandwich. The bun is more like a dinner roll, with one (albeit superb) chicken strip laid on it like Manute Bol on a twin bed. The much-hyped KFC Snacke is a superior solid strip of breast meat (unlike the chopped and formed competitors) coated in that great KFC batter. It goes down easy like a Chicken White Castle and is a great snack. You'd need at least two for a real lunch."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow KFC Snacker to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 07:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The policies say that articles containing flaws should not be deleted if they can be improved. Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion says, If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. Wikipedia:Editing policy#Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required says, Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. Cunard (talk) 07:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @Cunard. Madeleine (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khubz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 176.28.150.183 (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Middle East. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balushahi (Bihari cuisine)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’m nominating this article for deletion because the topic is already covered at Balushahi, which includes the same basic information. This article mainly repeats that content with a focus on Bihar, but it doesn’t provide enough unique or region-specific details to justify a separate page.

The writing also reads like it was generated using an AI tool, with a promotional tone and no strong sources. It could mislead readers into thinking this is a different topic when it’s really not.

Any useful content can be merged into the main article, but as it stands, this page isn’t needed on its own. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, India, and Bihar. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - as it stands, it clearly does not comply with Wikipedia:NPOV. However, it could be made into a decent article. Deb (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Door Knock Dinners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, i was unable to find any significant sources about this show except profiles. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United States of America. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gordon Elliott (journalist): I found this reasonably significant Rolling Stone coverage, but still not enough for notability. I'm ready to change my mind, if more sources are found. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Collaborative efforts identified enough sources to pass for notability (for sources see below). —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 10:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Food Network original programming Not stuck on this vote! for sure because this was one of Food Network's first big ratings successes and the idea this has few sources doesn't sit well with me. I'm definitely sure there's more out there than just 'tonight on TV' loglines for this show. Nathannah • 📮 19:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SIGCOV here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Farkash, Michael (1999-11-01). "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners". The Hollywood Reporter. Vol. 360, no. 13. p. 14. ProQuest 2467946432.
  The review notes: "Imagine a knock on the door. A TV crew shoves cameras in your face, and a prominent French chef rummages through your shelves to assemble a gourmet meal. Sounds a bit intrusive, right? But that's the trade off of free eats. The premise of "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners" seems like a tasty idea ripe for laughs, but the reality falters, coming off as a dis-appointing, disjointed presenta-tion. Elliott tries very, very hard, but he substitutes high energy for effective humor and seems har-ried. Better jokes or even more sarcastic gibes are needed to spice up the show. Elliott might find the right recipe later; he has a solid track record as a reporter."
2. Napolitano, Chris (1999-11-11). "Door Knock Dinners". Rolling Stone. No. 825. EBSCOhost 2429911. ProQuest 2629592737.
  The review notes: "A more apt title for Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners might be 101 Meals With a Ham. But no matter what you call it, this brash new show is the best dinner theater on the tube.The show is built around a simple premise - and one that New Yorkers will find familiar. At one time, Elliott barged his way into homes for Fox's Good Day New York. On Door Knock Dinners, he's still the uninvited guest, but this time he brings along a professional chef whose job it is to cook and serve a gourmet meal from whatever is found in the randomly selected home. It's like Cops with food - and Elliott is the battering ram. Everyone is in on the joke except for the uneasy hosts. Fast camera-work captures their reactions to Elliott, who delivers vaguely sinister remarks a la The Cat in the Hat. ... Oh, and there's the food. The recipes are deceptively simple - a pasta with artichoke hearts, Camembert and peas, for example, or chicken fillets with a vegetable medley - but clearly, the entree is showmanship. The mix of singing waiters, an accordion player and a tuxedoed Frenchy with a fake mustache results in a boisterous bouillabaisse that is sure to take the Food Network out of the kitchen and into the living room."
3. Elber, Lynn (1999-12-10). "When a gourmet dinner comes to you". Chicago Tribune. Associated Press. ProQuest 418936800. Archived from the original on 2025-06-14. Retrieved 2025-06-14 – via Newspapers.com.
  The review notes: "Gordon Elliott, a towering Australian with a chef, camera crew and disarming wit in tow as he invades American kitchens with the aim of providing a good meal and gentle tweaking for "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners." ... With Elliott orchestrating the controlled madness, it's refreshingly quirky. ... Even Elliott's best shots are affable, not gruff. ... With its homespun sweetness, "Door Knock Dinners" is an antidote to the extensive menu of shows in which average Americans are exploited as caricatures (Jerry Springer, are you still out there?) or as game pieces in the "Greed" follies. ... Elliott has wrapped the first 21 "Door Knock Dinners" episodes for Food Network and was preparing to fly off to Sydney for work on a series pilot that would take his gatecrasher technique to other countries."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Door Knock Dinners to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Reviews listed above are enough for GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 11:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Desta Global

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If one checks Google News and other news, the company cannot be named notable. Just random here and there blogs, mentions, wp:churnalism, newswire releases, WOW award, RMAI Flame award. The previous discussion was not representative and resulted in no consensus. Many of the sources have been already removed as spam. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 10:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Technology, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Of the references for DestaGlobal, Startup Success Stories India, Techcircle, Business Standard India, The Hindu Business Line (partially neutral), InterCon Dubai (YouTube), EVENTFAQS Media, Rural Marketing, and Digital Empowerment Foundation are focused on DestaGlobal’s success, awards, and positive impact. Most of these are based on the company’s claims without independent verification. The National and The Hindu are references that adhere to journalistic standards, providing neutral information about DestaGlobal’s work, but they lack detailed information. Hence, they are not sufficient to strongly support the claims. Some people may have different opinions about these two sources.-SachinSwami (talk) 7:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edible Communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company isn't notable. It fails to meet Wikipedia:GNG and feels like self-promotion. Eric Schucht (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - purely self-promotion. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "soft delete", but reopened upon request.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject of widespread coverage, with several articles in The New York Times: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Edible Communities won Publication of the Year at the 2011 James Beard Foundation awards :[8]. Thriley (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Thriley (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm confused by the "Fails GNG" claims by the nominator and those above. Because it very clearly doesn't? Like, to an impressive degree.

Local pair publishes magazine about food (Page 2) by Kathryn Fiegen, Iowa City Press-Citizen (2006)
Feast your eyes on this by H.M. Cauley, The Atlanta Constitution (2006)
Magazines help consumers eat close to home (Page 2) by Marian Burros, Anchorage Daily News (2007)
Champions of the local (Page 2) by Karna Hughes, Santa Barbara News-Press (2010)
Born in Ojai, Edible empire expanding to TV (Page 2) by Lisa McKinnon, Ventura County Star (2013)
After 17-years, Edible Phoenix magazine is for sale (Page 2) by Bahar Anooshahr, The Arizona Republic (2022)
Edible Institute visits Portland, talks sustainable seafood (Page 2) by Sophie Burchell, The Portland Forecaster (2024)

Just some examples of dozens and dozens of articles on the company and the magazines it has created, among other things (like the Edible Institute), that spans two decades. It rather feels like there wasn't any effort made to look for sources? Silver seren^C 00:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edible Manhattan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine isn't notable. It's a local franchise and not an individual publication. Eric Schucht (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edible Brooklyn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine isn't notable. It's a local franchise of a media company Eric Schucht (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources used in the article demonstrate notability. Thriley (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fire-King

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has existed for over 20 years and does not have any citations that are not primary sources (that is, from Anchor Hocking, the company that makes Fire-King branded glass products). The lack of citations has been noted before. The claims made on this page may be true. But citations have not surfaced. For those that wish to keep, perhaps citations can be dug up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiemantia (talk • contribs) 08:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Products, Japan, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's clear from the list in Further Reading that there are 6 books about Fire-king glassware, so it clearly meets WP:GNG with plenty of specific named, independent, reliable, significiant secondary sources. The fact that they have not been used as inline citations is not a reason to delete the article, per WP:NEXIST. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:50, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Rebecca Green, and here is even a link to a digitized version of one of the books (you need a free account to read it all) so you can check. And for bonus, here is a Japanese book about how to buy it from flea markets in America. Moritoriko (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jadeite (kitchenware)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, like the article for Fire-King, does not have many citations, and the citation needed tags are everywhere, making it clear that the lack of citations has been known. Citations have not surfaced. For those that wish to keep this page, perhaps citations can be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiemantia (talk • contribs) 08:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Products. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Notability is there, but the article need cleanup, and the barrage of CN tags isn't helping. There are two books listed as sources. Here are some more sources I found searching. Not sure they're all reliable, and I can't access the paywalled ones, but I'm pretty sure there are a couple good ones among the collection: [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] -- Avocado (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the sources already in the article, and those found by user Avocado, I have found a book, Jadite: An Identification and Price Guide [16], which has no preview on Google Books, but has 168 pages and covers "the works of the three major glass companies that produced jadite: McKee, Jeannette, and Anchor Hocking." There is enough SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG, even though we may not be able to immediately add inline citations from all the sources. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Purge server cache

Proposed deletions

Templates for Discussion