This page is intended to request administrator investigation of certain types of abuse only. Do not use this page until you read the policies, guidelines, and procedures. For obvious vandalism, see Administrator intervention against vandalism. Alerts that do not belong on this page may be removed without action or notice. |
To update this page, archives.
. For alerts that have already been addressed, see theWatchlist
- Report here:
- Articles being hit with a very high level of vandalism or are repeatedly vandalised with an extended time before reverts.
- Registered users or IPs that have carried out clear vandalism but have currently stopped.
- Do not report here:
- Articles featured on the front page, or very high profile articles - these will already be watched
- Vandals needing to be blocked - see WP:AIV instead.
- Users needing investigation - see one of the sections below.
- Use the following format:
* {{article|article name}} - brief explanation // ~~~~
or* {{vandal|username}} - brief explanation // ~~~~
or* {{IPvandal|Ip_Address}} - brief explanation //~~~~
- Reports will be removed from the list and watched by users in #vandalism-en-wp.
Watchlist requests
- example (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Example user blanked several articles, but stopped after being warned. Petros471 19:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
IP addresses
Do not report obvious vandalism here; see Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Only report IP addresses that are engaged in complicated, deceptive vandalism that will require more than a few moments for an administrator to analyse. Please read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting. |
Requests
Please use this format at the top of this section:
* {{IPvandal|IP Address}} -- Brief Description // ~~~~
- 63.205.198.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- Continuosly removes team leaders from Power Rangers articles. Leaders of Power Ranger teams are important in the fanbase. Left a note on the talk page, completely ignored. // Andros 1337 15:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've tried another. Not sure this strictly counts as vandalism, but I can still block for disruption if continues persistently without discussion after a couple more warnings. Petros471 19:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- 135.196.140.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- This user edits the Faceparty article, changing the tone to one promotional to the buisness, and removing any crtical content. I have placed a warning on the talk page, but it appers previous interventions have gone un-noted. As the only edits registered to this IP appear to be to this article, I would imagine that blocking would be an effective end to the disruption. Neo 11:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Given a final warning. Petros471 19:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- 68.227.69.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- This user has been adding external links to articles about particular albums and films, all of which point to a review of the CD or film at the same website - presumably a site the user is trying to promote. I think this is inappropriate, but I don't want to simply revert all the changes as many of them are in obscure articles where it is now the only external link. // Grace 09:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on reporters talk page. Petros471 19:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- 203.217.13.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 203.51.240.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), and 203.10.59.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Strong evidence that all three of these are sock puppets of an indefinitely blocked user, User:Universe Daily; please see entry on User:UniverseToday and User:Bad Astronomer below. - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/wp:space) 09:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- UPDATE: At least one of these three sock puppet IP addresses has been used to revert to the same linkspam again, IMMEDIATELY AFTER two additional registered username sock puppets of the same user had been indefinitely blocked. Indefinite blocks of these three IP addresses seems appropriate at this point. See the referral resulting in the indefinite block of the two username sock puppets here; see an 8th reversion in a row to the same linkspam, under one of these three IP addresses, AFTER the indefinite block of the two username sock puppets, here. (Please note that the linkspam in question uses both a description and a URL that seem to be relevant to the article, but the URL is actually a redirect to the original linkspam site.) - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/wp:space) 01:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- UPDATE AGAIN: One of these IP addresses was recently used in apparent collaboration with an apparent brand new sock puppet for this user, after two more of his registered username sock puppets were blocked indefinitely; see User_talk:Richard_Branson#Re:_Evidence_of_bad_faith_adoption_of_.22Richard_Branson.22_username_by_three-time_indefinitely_blocked_user. - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/ub/w:s/w:l) 05:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Registered users
New requests
Read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting. Do not report content or user disputes here, unless you can provide links demonstrating a strong attempt at dispute resolution. Please use this format at the top of this section:
* {{vandal|User_name}} -- Brief Description // ~~~~
Usernames are case sensitive and please note that spaces in usernames need to be replaced by underscores (as shown in the example above).
- Pcnate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - possible link spammer. - Davodd 17:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Reverted (most) and warned (generaly as it looks like 'good faith' addition of links. Petros471 19:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Kb00462 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- This vandal continually removes the "Instructional Controversy section of the Erwin_Ballarta page because he has personal ties with Ballarta. The information in the "Instructional Controversy" has been cited, and is truthful. This has been occuring for over a month. Several attempts to discuss the problem with the user have resulted in no reply. // Truth 03:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- My initial investigation suggests that you, User:Truth2008, made a peculiar allegation about Kb00462 on his or her talk page. Perhaps you had better examine your own behavior on WP before making accusations about others. Meanwhile, I have added this page to my watchlist. -- Hoary 08:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- FAOSTAT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Most of this user's edits have been spam for an (IMHO NN) organization... most of these edits have been direct copyvios of the organizations assorted pages located @ http://www.fao.org/ ... I just ran through his/her/it's contribs, and attempted to clean it up some... even it's user page is a copyvio of one of the org's web-pages (http://www.fao.org/faostat/index_en.asp)... it appears that they have also used several anon IPs to edit... the organization may actually be notable, but this user is hurting them more than helping... - Adolphus79 10:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Under investigation
- The articles for deletion pages for Dave Roberts (reporter) and Jim Gardner are full of apparent sockpuppets who are biased against Philly TV News personalities. They include FunkyChicken! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), UncleFloyd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Nertz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), The Matt Feldman Experience! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), MrPhillyTV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and ShigeruNomi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). This isn't the first time this has happened, as the actions of this user were documented last year on this page. ErikNY 19:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've opened a checkuser case. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/FunkyChicken!. Petros471 10:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Here's a hint to help your investigation along. Check out the following users. 53ND, WWACArtist, WashingtonWillie, UncleFloyd, FunkyChicken!, Spotteddogsdotorg, TVXpert, Toasthaven, Toasthaven2, Ngsantia, ShyLou, JER53Y, NevilleShunt, NYTVGuy, JAA01A, WestchesterGuy, SquirrelKabob, TheSpottedDogsOrganisation, ShureMicGuy, Hohokus, KiwiPunter, Tobyvonmeistersinger, Melvis, MrPhillyTV, Frühstücksdienst, 209.137.173.69. See also the recent AfD votes on Jersey Shore Communications, List of US railfan jargon, List of UK railfan jargon, Boring Business Systems, and WWAC-TV. 70.108.82.120 17:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- The checkuser request was declined. If you want this report to be taken further you will have to provide more specific evidence. Petros471 18:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- They're all self-evidently the same person. This wasn't a checkuser request unless somebody wants to take it further. This was just a pointer to help anyone who wants to investigate for themselves. I checked around last week after the WWAC-TV hoax and it was pretty easy to figure out this person's game and his dozens of accounts. But I have no intention of pursuing it. If somebody else does, the list above is your place to start. 70.108.82.120 18:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry. I now see your response was saying that the checkuser request as a whole was declined, not just my post. 70.108.82.120 19:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- The checkuser request was declined. If you want this report to be taken further you will have to provide more specific evidence. Petros471 18:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Jessica_Liao (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- She is using this username, as well as Kyla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Oahc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Oh_behaVa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Xtremeruna21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Evets (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Enitsirhc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and perhaps others. I am her cousin and need to let you know that she is developmentally delayed. If you look at her talk history(ies), you will see that she doesn't understand many things. I have repeatedly told her that wikipedia requires that you use only one username but she continues to create new ones. She is using them often simultaneously. She has been banned from using wikipedia without supervision but continues to do so. Is there any way to ban all her usernames/IP addresses except for one? I know she will just create more, but perhaps if she is given warnings by wikipedia, she will understand that she cannot keep using multiple usernames. Jane8888 15:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that she also posts frequently from her local library (IP address appears to be 204.168.120.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), and has apparently been quite busy emailing administrators to delete her talk histories on her various usernames--she is aware that we have been following her wikipedia activities closely and that she is disobeying the rules her parents set up for her. Jane8888 23:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've filled a WP:RFCU just to confirm that it is the same person using all these accounts. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jessica Liao. Petros471 18:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- One more IP--might belong to the library also, but some of her changes can be seen attached to this IP 204.168.120.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) as well. Looks like she deleted the talk history for "social promotion", wherein a user questioned her multiple identities, and then that other user reverted the talk history. Jane8888 04:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've filled a WP:RFCU just to confirm that it is the same person using all these accounts. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jessica Liao. Petros471 18:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that she also posts frequently from her local library (IP address appears to be 204.168.120.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), and has apparently been quite busy emailing administrators to delete her talk histories on her various usernames--she is aware that we have been following her wikipedia activities closely and that she is disobeying the rules her parents set up for her. Jane8888 23:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
See also
- /Archives
- Wikipedia:Long term abuse
- Wikipedia:Vandalism contains information about vandalism, antivandalism methods and tools, and links to other relevant pages.
- Meta:Finding network abuse contacts