Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SimonP (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 17 September 2004 (S). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Below is a list of duplicate articles that have been created mostly by mistake. They have to be merged into a single piece of work, and one title has to be redirected to the other (or a completely new page must be created) in accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Canonicalization.

Categories that need merging can be listed (together) on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion where one category will be deleted after merging into the other.

If you disagree with a 'merge' indication then change the template from {{Merge}} to {{MergeDisputed}} and discuss it on this page until consensus is reached.


Proactive action: avoiding duplicates

The creation of duplicate articles, and the wasted effort this causes, can be avoided by creating lots of redirects. Also, when creating new articles, search for existing articles on the same subject (when search is enabled).

Wikipedia:Orphaned Articles lists articles that aren't linked to, and may have been created when a new article was created without having searched for a previously existing article.

Mark current duplicates

If you find a pair of articles which appear to be duplicates, merge them! If you can't carry out the merge yourself, put the following at top of each:

{{merge}} [[Other article]]

This marks the pages so that future viewers will see that it needs to be merged. If you know which way the merge should go, you can put the following at the top of the article where the merged material should end up:

{{mergefrom}} [[Other article]]

Please note that this list is not generated "automagically," and its entries must be added by hand.

Help with the clean-up

To merge articles, follow the advice on the list below. Usually, an experienced user will suggest that one article be absorbed into another. Read both articles carefully and decide which article has the more appropriate title and content. Merge the content by copying/pasting from one window to another. Be sure not to allow any of the good content to be lost in the transfer. Upon completion, it is critical to place a redirect on the page that the content has been moved from. For example, if you move the content of "John Ronald Doe" into "John Doe" you would put a redirect on "John Ronald Doe". This helps people find the new article title and prevents others from mistakenly recreating the duplicate.

If you copy material from one article to the other, you must explain in your edit comment that you have done so, giving the name of the source article, for example "Merged material from [[John Ronald Doe]] into section "Biography"." This is important so that all contributors to the article can be properly credited, as required by the GFDL.

Alternatively, you could also leave the two pages distinct (without a redirect), but complete the text of one of the pages so that it is no longer a duplicate, incorrect, or a stub. For example, someone might suggest that the "Cinema of India" and "History of Indian Cinema" be merged, as they contain mostly duplicate information. In this case "Cinema of India" should contain an overview of the subject, including a short summary of the history, with a link to "History of Indian Cinema" which should contain the detailed history.

After a pair has been merged, please remove them from the list below. If you want to show off your work, use the Talk Page.

Template:CompactTOCwithnumbers

Articles to be merged

See also: Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Merge and Category:Articles to be merged

0-9

A

B

C

  • Chromatography merged with Paper chromatography of amino acids - rhyax 21:42, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • The categories Cities in the Netherlands and Dutch cities deal with the same subject. I suggest moving the content of Cities in the Netherlands to Dutch cities, since the latter contains more articles than the former. Cities in the Netherlands could then be deleted. (hyperlinks don't seem to work here) Aecis 16:55, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Chroma key and Bluescreen -- the former isn't always synonymous with the latter, but the article on it actually contains more information on bluescreening than on the old-style chromakey process. The respective scope of the articles overlap, and as it stands they subtly contradict each other on numerous points. Austin Hair 09:34, Jul 31, 2004 (UTC) I removed all irrelevant information. Now is the time to re-write the two ill-defined articles. -- Toytoy 17:56, Aug 24, 2004 (UTC)

D

E

F

G

H

  • Hammer Films and Hammer Horror
    • Both have a right to exist, but someone who knows the subject should work out which information belongs in which article
  • Hawkish into Militarism since Hawk describes a militarist.
    • Nonsense. Hawk and Dove are primarily terms used to describe relative positions, in a particular military decision, within a commander-in-chief's advisers. Militarism's primary meaning is about the role of the military in a society, or about how much effort to give in the long term to military capabilities. In most states with a stable polity, both militarists and pacifists are outside the decision-making, and calling them hawks and doves respectively is just careless metaphorizing. --Jerzy(t) 04:55, 2004 Aug 14 (UTC)
    • QV Dovish, a redirect to Pacifism. Perhaps Hawkish should redirect to a different article? --Rossumcapek 05:07, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Heat and Heat transfer? They have a bit of overlap.
  • Helical pump should be merged into progressive cavity pump. The pump my father brought home was made of hard metal inside a rubber-lined metal tube, as described. -phma 20:57, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Home rule should be merged into Devolution
  • Human Face of Pedophilia & Lindsay Ashford

I

Interlaced scanning should be merged into Interlace, but a fact dispute between them whether odd or even lines are scanned first must be resolved. --Gary D 22:41, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

J

K

L

M

N

O

  • Occult and occultism (though both articles are a bit lacking) -Sean Curtin 00:14, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • I merged the articles into Occult, but yes there is room for improvement. — RJH 03:23, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Osteology is a very sorry looking substub. Before adding information I was wondering whether to merge/take information from/redirect with Bone? CheekyMonkey 16:58, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

P

Q

R

S

The latter is sufficiently different to merit a separate article (though right now both pages are just lists...) -Sean Curtin 07:57, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The point is, they are NOT different. There is no "Polish mythology", it was just a west-slavic variant of the Slavic mythology. It's just the impression this article gives. Ausir 18:28, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Slogan:Homosexuality is a choice.
  • Sonogram with spectrogram.
    • At least in N America, sonogram refers to the film of an ultrasound scan as often as it does sound spectrogram. Perhaps a dismbiguation sentence under sonogram and merge the current content into spectrogram? (I don't know anything about speech sonograms/spectrograms, so that is just a suggestion)
  • Southhold and Southhold, NY into Southold (town), New York (actually, I believe the first article has everything the second does--I didn't make the latter a redir just in case someone thinks it's important to preserve that single entry in the history), then redir from the first two. Niteowlneils 21:55, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • StarCraft needs around 60 pages to be merged INTO it, see Talk:StarCraft for details.
  • Sturtian-Varangian and Varanger glaciation same subject, my english skill is a bit short to do correctly the job phe 09:16, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

T

U

V

W

  • War of Independence of 1857 and Indian Mutiny deal with the same topic. The former was started independently of the latter, which existed already. However, there is an ongoing discussion regarding the title of the article (which can be used to merge the contents of both). Any help in resolving this would be greatly appreciated. Chancemill 08:37, Apr 23, 2004 (UTC)
According to the vote, Indian rebellion of 1857 seems to be the place where it should finnaly rest. 22:45, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Witch trial and Burning Times into witch-hunt. -Sean Curtin 05:31, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • hmm... Witch-hunt is used as a verb and still goes on. there needs to be some type of differentiation. maybe with-hunt seperate from the other 2 Williamb 06:39, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • "Witch hunt" is the more common term. For example, Burning Times refers exclusively to "witch hunts", not once to "witch trials". Google hits for "witch trial": 11K; for "witch hunt", 271K; for "witchcraft trial", 2K; for "Burning Times", 26K. Uses of the term "witch-hunt" in reference to modern-day activities should be discussed in the article, not moved to a separate article. -Sean Curtin 00:07, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Browser notes into meta:Browser issues with MediaWiki. --Zigger 12:28, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • there could be a case to leaving them separated, firstoff, the two projects use difrent character encoding, secondly the wiki one seems to be along the lins of, if you have x browere, then you might have x problems, where as the meta one seems like, there are the known issues with meta. although i think that may just bee a diffrence in style.

X

Y

Z