Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:00, 11 June 2025

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Food and drink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close‎ For whatever reason, the nominator had issues completing this nomination and ended up starting the identical Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balushahi (Bihari cuisine) (2nd nomination). It is that nomination that the AfD tag on the article points to and has remained listed, and where the discussion will ultimately continue. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balushahi (Bihari cuisine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’m nominating this article for deletion because the topic is already covered at Balushahi, which includes the same basic information. This article mainly repeats that content with a focus on Bihar, but it doesn’t provide enough unique or region-specific details to justify a separate page.

The writing also reads like it was generated using an AI tool, with a promotional tone and no strong sources. It could mislead readers into thinking this is a different topic when it’s really not.

Any useful content can be merged into the main article, but as it stands, this page isn’t needed on its own. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Door Knock Dinners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, i was unable to find any significant sources about this show except profiles. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United States of America. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gordon Elliott (journalist): I found this reasonably significant Rolling Stone coverage, but still not enough for notability. I'm ready to change my mind, if more sources are found. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Collaborative efforts identified enough sources to pass for notability (for sources see below). —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 10:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Food Network original programming Not stuck on this vote! for sure because this was one of Food Network's first big ratings successes and the idea this has few sources doesn't sit well with me. I'm definitely sure there's more out there than just 'tonight on TV' loglines for this show. Nathannah • 📮 19:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SIGCOV here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Farkash, Michael (1999-11-01). "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners". The Hollywood Reporter. Vol. 360, no. 13. p. 14. ProQuest 2467946432.
  The review notes: "Imagine a knock on the door. A TV crew shoves cameras in your face, and a prominent French chef rummages through your shelves to assemble a gourmet meal. Sounds a bit intrusive, right? But that's the trade off of free eats. The premise of "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners" seems like a tasty idea ripe for laughs, but the reality falters, coming off as a dis-appointing, disjointed presenta-tion. Elliott tries very, very hard, but he substitutes high energy for effective humor and seems har-ried. Better jokes or even more sarcastic gibes are needed to spice up the show. Elliott might find the right recipe later; he has a solid track record as a reporter."
2. Napolitano, Chris (1999-11-11). "Door Knock Dinners". Rolling Stone. No. 825. EBSCOhost 2429911. ProQuest 2629592737.
  The review notes: "A more apt title for Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners might be 101 Meals With a Ham. But no matter what you call it, this brash new show is the best dinner theater on the tube.The show is built around a simple premise - and one that New Yorkers will find familiar. At one time, Elliott barged his way into homes for Fox's Good Day New York. On Door Knock Dinners, he's still the uninvited guest, but this time he brings along a professional chef whose job it is to cook and serve a gourmet meal from whatever is found in the randomly selected home. It's like Cops with food - and Elliott is the battering ram. Everyone is in on the joke except for the uneasy hosts. Fast camera-work captures their reactions to Elliott, who delivers vaguely sinister remarks a la The Cat in the Hat. ... Oh, and there's the food. The recipes are deceptively simple - a pasta with artichoke hearts, Camembert and peas, for example, or chicken fillets with a vegetable medley - but clearly, the entree is showmanship. The mix of singing waiters, an accordion player and a tuxedoed Frenchy with a fake mustache results in a boisterous bouillabaisse that is sure to take the Food Network out of the kitchen and into the living room."
3. Elber, Lynn (1999-12-10). "When a gourmet dinner comes to you". Chicago Tribune. Associated Press. ProQuest 418936800. Archived from the original on 2025-06-14. Retrieved 2025-06-14 – via Newspapers.com.
  The review notes: "Gordon Elliott, a towering Australian with a chef, camera crew and disarming wit in tow as he invades American kitchens with the aim of providing a good meal and gentle tweaking for "Gordon Elliott's Door Knock Dinners." ... With Elliott orchestrating the controlled madness, it's refreshingly quirky. ... Even Elliott's best shots are affable, not gruff. ... With its homespun sweetness, "Door Knock Dinners" is an antidote to the extensive menu of shows in which average Americans are exploited as caricatures (Jerry Springer, are you still out there?) or as game pieces in the "Greed" follies. ... Elliott has wrapped the first 21 "Door Knock Dinners" episodes for Food Network and was preparing to fly off to Sydney for work on a series pilot that would take his gatecrasher technique to other countries."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Door Knock Dinners to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Reviews listed above are enough for GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 11:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Food contact materials. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Food contact chemical

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a glorified WP:DICTDEF. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Science. UtherSRG (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment This is not about the chemicals per se. The topic is instead their transfer into food during cooking or storage. Mangoe (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The term FCC is one used in published documents as cited. So I’m not sure I agree this article warrants deletion. Can you provide more justification for deletion? Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 14:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article is defining the term and lists which things fall in the definition, and categorize them in various ways. This is not an encyclopedia article. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response. I’m curious if the view is the article is not encyclopedic or that it’s not notable. If the former, the author could update it to be so. I do think it’s notable. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 10:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A Dictdef, by definition, is not enclyclopedic. This should not have been accepted at AFC as it is not an encyclopedia article. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the first two paragraphs with Food contact materials whose scope already covers this topic and includes some of the impacts of chemical migration from packaging to food (legislation/regulations). The third paragraph might be salvagable, but a list of chemicals that can be found in food because of their packaging probably lacks too much context. ⇌ Synpath 14:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect: Not substantial enough to warrant a standalone page. Overlaps with the context and coverage of Food contact materials and should be merged with that article (with a redirect left in place). WeWake (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 23:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Desta Global

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If one checks Google News and other news, the company cannot be named notable. Just random here and there blogs, mentions, wp:churnalism, newswire releases, WOW award, RMAI Flame award. The previous discussion was not representative and resulted in no consensus. Many of the sources have been already removed as spam. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 10:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Technology, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Of the references for DestaGlobal, Startup Success Stories India, Techcircle, Business Standard India, The Hindu Business Line (partially neutral), InterCon Dubai (YouTube), EVENTFAQS Media, Rural Marketing, and Digital Empowerment Foundation are focused on DestaGlobal’s success, awards, and positive impact. Most of these are based on the company’s claims without independent verification. The National and The Hindu are references that adhere to journalistic standards, providing neutral information about DestaGlobal’s work, but they lack detailed information. Hence, they are not sufficient to strongly support the claims. Some people may have different opinions about these two sources.-SachinSwami (talk) 7:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:11, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DeHaat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources with SIGNIFICANT Coverage; basically we have only news on raises of money, Indian startup achievements, and acquisitions. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Technology, and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Edible Communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company isn't notable. It fails to meet Wikipedia:GNG and feels like self-promotion. Eric Schucht (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - purely self-promotion. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "soft delete", but reopened upon request.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject of widespread coverage, with several articles in The New York Times: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Edible Communities won Publication of the Year at the 2011 James Beard Foundation awards :[6]. Thriley (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Thriley (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edible Manhattan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine isn't notable. It's a local franchise and not an individual publication. Eric Schucht (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edible Brooklyn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine isn't notable. It's a local franchise of a media company Eric Schucht (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources used in the article demonstrate notability. Thriley (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fire-King

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has existed for over 20 years and does not have any citations that are not primary sources (that is, from Anchor Hocking, the company that makes Fire-King branded glass products). The lack of citations has been noted before. The claims made on this page may be true. But citations have not surfaced. For those that wish to keep, perhaps citations can be dug up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiemantia (talk • contribs) 08:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Products, Japan, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's clear from the list in Further Reading that there are 6 books about Fire-king glassware, so it clearly meets WP:GNG with plenty of specific named, independent, reliable, significiant secondary sources. The fact that they have not been used as inline citations is not a reason to delete the article, per WP:NEXIST. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:50, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Rebecca Green, and here is even a link to a digitized version of one of the books (you need a free account to read it all) so you can check. And for bonus, here is a Japanese book about how to buy it from flea markets in America. Moritoriko (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jadeite (kitchenware)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, like the article for Fire-King, does not have many citations, and the citation needed tags are everywhere, making it clear that the lack of citations has been known. Citations have not surfaced. For those that wish to keep this page, perhaps citations can be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiemantia (talk • contribs) 08:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Products. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Notability is there, but the article need cleanup, and the barrage of CN tags isn't helping. There are two books listed as sources. Here are some more sources I found searching. Not sure they're all reliable, and I can't access the paywalled ones, but I'm pretty sure there are a couple good ones among the collection: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] -- Avocado (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the sources already in the article, and those found by user Avocado, I have found a book, Jadite: An Identification and Price Guide [14], which has no preview on Google Books, but has 168 pages and covers "the works of the three major glass companies that produced jadite: McKee, Jeannette, and Anchor Hocking." There is enough SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG, even though we may not be able to immediately add inline citations from all the sources. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:34, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Master of Science in Rural Development

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to be promotional in nature, focusing exclusively on a specific master's program without providing evidence of any notability. Even basic online research shows no indications of academic recognition, such as rankings or third-party evaluations. Chiserc (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Europe. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Science, and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom. No independent coverage for this individual masters program. Pragmatic Puffin (talk) 08:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Is it possible to merge it somewhere? Lorstaking (talk) 07:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was considering with Erasmus Mundus, since the program has many coordinated universities. However, this is also highly promotional and may be nominated for deletion, particularly under Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over. Chiserc (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on merging?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:49, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete no notability, potentially WP:PROMO, no significant coverage available at all. --hroest 20:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sandstein 13:32, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardo T. Chua

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has lacked sufficient independent sources for a number of years. Appears known only for multi-level-marketing invesigrations, and no real WP:SIGCOV. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Thanks, ZimZalaBim for notifying me. I see I did make one substantial edit to this article. It was in relation to Gano Excel, Organo Gold, Direct Selling Association and Vemma—as relates to the Italian government finding Vemma was a pyramid scheme, and Chua was part of it. Whether Chua is wiki-level notable himself, or not, I think there's enough notability for the companies. Since the Chua BLP existed already, it was the article I stuffed the content into. I wouldn't mind if the content was stowed somewhere else and the redirects changed accordingly. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink, Philippines, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Unfortunately its notoriously hard not to find sources for MLMs that are not astroturf/PR articles.There is only one quality source which is the CBS News one. The sources being dominated by advisories makes the impression that the article was made as a Wikipedia:RIGHTGREATWRONGS to fight against Chua and his business model. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Like Hariboneagle, the only usable source I found was the CBS one. Grorp could stow the info in the Vemma article if they wish I suppose. Moritoriko (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verwurelter

Purge server cache

Proposed deletions

Koshur Anchar (via WP:PROD on 22 March 2025)

Templates for Discussion

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 == Food and drink ==
 <!-- New AFD's should be placed on top of the list, directly below this line -->
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balushahi (Bihari cuisine)}}
 {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Door Knock Dinners}}
 {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food contact chemical}}