Jump to content

Talk:Elon Musk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former featured article candidateElon Musk is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleElon Musk has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 4, 2021Good article nomineeListed
July 24, 2021Peer reviewNot reviewed
August 23, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 1, 2022Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 15, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Elon Musk lost $16.3 billion in a single day, the largest in the history of the Bloomberg Billionaires Index?
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Add a Trump-Elon split subject or paragraph under politics?

He has been criticizing trump all day and now he tweeted trump IS on the epstein list. He obviously isn't with trump anymore. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This event definitely needs to be mentioned in the article, but I think it's best to wait and see how this plays out before calling this the "Trump-Musk split." NesserWiki (talk) 19:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Dutch ancestry?

The article states "He is of British and Pennsylvania Dutch ancestry." with two footnote references. The first reference does not address Pennsylvania Dutch. The second reference states it without attribution. Reading other sources suggests he is of Dutch or English South African ancestry, which I imagine would be Boer. (?) The only Pennsylvania connection I've seen is from his schooling at U. of Pa. after emigrating from South Africa via Canada. Is there any actual basis for the "Pennsylvania Dutch" part? Scryer~enwiki (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feud in the lead

Since the article for the Musk-Trump feud has been AfD'd, should it be removed from the lead temporarily until that's closed? I support keeping the "current event" disclaimer at the top of the article as long as the other page exists, though. GrandDuchyConti 💜(talk) 22:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even if that dumpster fire of an article by some grace of stupidity survives deletion, the topic is not lead-worthy. Zaathras (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lead should follow body and there is no way a due weighting of the body gives this enough space that it should be included in the lead. If a year from now there is still some feud and it makes a huge impact on his life then it is lead worthy. Czarking0 (talk) 04:43, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Until there is another major news cycle about his latest wizard wheeze. No it should not be in the lede. Slatersteven (talk) 10:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So is this terribly important feud still on? Slatersteven (talk) 14:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not as much no. Elon Musk deleted his tweet on the Epstein files, but floated the idea of a new third party. GrandDuchyConti 💜(talk) 14:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So if (a big if) he launched a third party that (and not this feud) should go the lede. Slatersteven (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree GrandDuchyConti 💜(talk) 14:45, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per Czarking0, lacks due weight for an such a summary level article with multiple child articles. At Views of Elon Musk there is also a one sentence summary, meaning at this parent article very little is also due if any, nowhere near the lead. CNC (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor typo

Paragraph 3, first mention of Trump: " In January 2025, he was appointed head of Trump's newly created DOGE." Please change "Trump" to either "President Donald Trump" or just "Donald Trump," because it's the first mention of him in this article. I'm not saying this out of respect for TACO, just noting it should be gramatically correct. TeamEquestria (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

Yesterday someone changed the infobox image to one where Musk has a black eye. I don't think we need to debate this one, but when it was reverted the image was changed. It was reverted by me and another person to an image that was used a day ago, but two hours ago the image was changed again to an older image that we were using not too long ago. I don't want to edit war so I'm not going to touch it, but which image should we be using? What was the consensus before this happened? ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also Template:Elon Musk series now has a different image than the one used in this article. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has just re-added the black eye image to Template:Elon Musk series. Also Template:Elon Musk has a different image to the rest. ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]