User:Abishe/AFD

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 06	June 08 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Shinnyō-ji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested redirect without improvement. Currently 2 unreliable and 1 primary source. Searches revealed lots of mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Buddhism and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Trollface Edits

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not encyclopedic Polygnotus (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Flower (skunk from Bambi)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as a standalone character - the sources are either simple routine listings or not about the character at all - the only source that appears to be is really just an interview with the voice actor. Unable to find anything significant on a BEFORE. Flower (Bambi is already a redirect, and this article title is not viable as one. CoconutOctopus talk 12:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Comics and animation, and Disney. CoconutOctopus talk 12:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note that Flower (Bambi) is effectively salted. If this afd results in a keep, I suggest histmerge into the redirect and unlock the article. – robertsky (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Carlos Ramos Blanco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable player, fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG/WP:ANYBIO. Only primary and non independent sourcing. Was previously deleted by PROD and was undeleted without reason by an editor seeking to maintain an "undeletion streak" (see [1] ). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Spain. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Refs fail WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Ameerul Shafiq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. My WP:BEFORE search did not pick up any significant coverage in Singaporean news sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Sa Aung Ko Ko

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-pro footballer and assistant coach with no sources showing significant coverage. Looks to fail WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG. My own WP:BEFORE yielded only social media and Football Manager database sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Myanmar, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

New Zealand Asian Studies Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Unreferenced for 15 years and fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and New Zealand. LibStar (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete: per nom FMSky (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Shinola (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find sources that were sufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Suonii180 (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and North Carolina. Suonii180 (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete A single critical review in Billboard (magazine) is not sufficient on its own. Please ping me if further sources surface.ResonantDis_tortion 12:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Shafuan Sutohmoh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even a Singaporean source search yields nothing other than Transfermarkt, which is an unreliable user-generated database source. I can find nothing that shows a passing of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC anywhere. Clarets Mad is a passing mention on a fan site, so doesn't count towards notability. I can't even find anything about this footballer in the reliable database sources, not that that would make him notable if he was there. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Mohsen Seifi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was draftified. Two additional sources were added, and then it was moved back to mainspace. Neither of those two sources help show GNG. Then it was a contested prod. Current sourcing has zero in-depth coverage, and it might be due to language barriers, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth references from independent, reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:45, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Rajputs in Gujarat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was started by a sockpuppet blocked user. There is no need to have such a article because in this article mostly content is on kingdoms of rajputs. There is already an article named List of Rajput dynasties and states, which is better place to complile the whole dynasties of Rajputs all over India and for notable people there is already List of Rajputs TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Gujarat. TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy Delete: Fair enough, Ironically their is tone of cautionary redundant sources which remark it's proximity toward the unintelligible contentment WP:Delete 2402:8100:2B5B:6B3B:2496:E5FF:FE90:BEB3 (talk) 09:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Agree with Nominator. 🦅Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2025 (UTC) sock LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 07:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 09:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Rajputs in Himachal Pradesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was started by a sockpuppet blocked user. There is no need to have such a article because in this article mostly content is on kingdoms of rajputs. There is already an article named List of Rajput dynasties and states, which is better place to complile the whole dynasties of Rajputs all over India and for notable people there is already List of Rajputs TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Himachal Pradesh. TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: their is not a single notated impression to specifically ordered the sequence of this article while relaying with WP:OR 2402:8100:2B5B:6B3B:2496:E5FF:FE90:BEB3 (talk) 09:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: hoax created by sock per WP:CFORK only caste promotion through mentioning dynasties. 🦅Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC) sock LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 07:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Gautam Butalia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE shows no sources that would allow Butalia to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC, due to a lack of significant coverage from WP:RS. The three provided external links don't indicate any notability. This is unsurprising, given that he has only played at lower levels in Singapore. Draft:Gautam Butalia already exists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Nazakat Ahmad Ali Shah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Travel and tourism, and Jammu and Kashmir. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:04, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
The subject may appears to be notable only with the connection to the 2025 Pahalgam attack. As per criteria 2 support to Merge at the 2025 Pahalgam attack. Fade258 (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Christopher Snowdon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous PROD (endorsed and deleted) for a subject who has no secondary sources, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR nor WP:JOURNALIST. The subject's claim to a PhD cannot be verified - I wrote to the alleged awarding institution as neither I nor others could find any PhD and the institution provided no information. The restoration of this one seems to have been an error, caught up in this mass restore of soft deleted articles [2] where discussion shows that the dePRODer intended to restore sports bios PRODed by a particular user, but included this one apprently by accident. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Trampsta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail to meet GNG and SNG WP:COMPOSER Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Thom Brodeur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASIC. Unable to find coverage from reliable sources which is both independent and significant. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Omneky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. All citations are press releases, media wires, or otherwise non-independent. No significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Blackpot-kettle (talk) 05:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Lodestone Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This video game company appears to have only worked on one game, PlanetSide, with two others being cancelled and the company becoming defunct. As such there doesn't appear to be any sources about the company, including when it dissolved. GamerPro64 05:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Business, Companies, and Virginia. GamerPro64 05:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to PlanetSide (video game). I added a mention to the article about Lodestone Games. --Mika1h (talk) 07:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Redirect as above on current sourcing. Studio articles whose sourcing is non-existent or mostly focused on a game rather than the studio itself may run afoul of notability: see WP:NOTWORK for this rationale. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Umair (music producer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. At first glance there appears to be significant coverage but looking closer you will see that most are not bylined, are from unreliable sources, or just routine coverage or mentions. CNMall41 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep – Umair meets WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. His 2024 album Rockstar Without a Guitar peaked at #8 on Spotify Pakistan and was featured in Genius Community’s 25 Best Albums of 2024 (ThePrint). His single “Asli Hai” topped YouTube Pakistan charts (Music Metrics Vault). Covered by reliable sources like Samaa TV, ThePrint, Wordplay Magazine, and Itz Hip Hop. Producer for notable duo Young Stunners. Meets NMUSIC via charting work, media coverage, and national significance.

— Behappyyar (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

NMUSICIAN would not be met based on charting. Spotify and YouTube are not acceptable under WP:CHART. Also, being a producer for someone notable does not come with inherent notability. Can you address the non-bylined references? Do you feel these are reliable and if so how? For WP:GNG, you are also cited press releases above which can never be used for notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 While it’s true that WP:CHART places limits on YouTube/Spotify data for standalone notability, those indicators support broader cultural relevance under WP:NMUSIC#1 and WP:GNG. Chart placements help demonstrate impact in the absence of traditional charts in South Asia, where mainstream media often lags behind independent or digital-first musicians.

Regarding sources:

Samaa TV and ThePrint are independent, professional outlets with editorial oversight and journalistic standards. These are not self-published or fan-driven and are widely accepted as RS in other music-related AfDs.
The Itz Hip Hop review is bylined and analytical, not promotional; it contains critical assessment of Umair’s production and album structure.
The Wordplay Magazine article, while regional, is independent and contains critical evaluation — see similar RS used in AfDs for artists in UK/India-Pak context.

I accept that the ANI press release cannot count toward WP:GNG, but it was cited for factual support of chart placements, not to satisfy notability directly.

Notability isn’t only about headlining credits. Umair is the primary producer behind Rebirth and Open Letter, two of the most discussed hip-hop albums in Pakistan — both critically reviewed in RS and recognized in independent retrospectives. His influence is creative and structural, meeting WP:NMUSIC#2 (“significant contribution to the work of others that is covered in reliable sources”).

On balance, the article meets WP:GNG through multiple independent sources with critical commentary, and WP:NMUSIC through documented production of notable albums and influence on Pakistan’s hip-hop scene.

— Behappyyar (talk) 06:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Playing a major role in major works proves notability. Could you give more info on the part he played and on the notability of those albums? — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Not to forget: Talha Anjum's most famous song Kaun Talha? in which he diss an Indian rapper Naezy was produced by Umair. ^[1] Behappyyar (talk) 15:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@(Itzcuauhtli11) He served as the lead producer and co-composer on both Rebirth (2017) and Open Letter (2023), two landmark Urdu hip-hop albums in Pakistan.

On Rebirth, Umair produced all 15 tracks for Young Stunners, a duo considered foundational to Pakistani rap. The album is credited with shaping the Urdu hip-hop scene and received wide media attention from outlets like SAMAA TV.^[2]

For Open Letter, he was again the key producer, collaborating with Talha Anjum and international names such as KRSNA. The album was reviewed independently and discussed critically within South Asian music forums.^[3]^[4]

These albums are not just popular but culturally significant, marking key points in the evolution of Pakistani hip-hop. Umair’s complete production involvement and critical coverage of these albums demonstrate a major creative role in notable works, satisfying WP:NMUSIC#2 and strengthening his case under WP:GNG. ^[5]

References

^ "Indian rapper asks 'Talha Kaun?', Talha Anjum responds with a brutal diss track". Images.Dawn.com. Dawn Media Group. 21 May 2025. Retrieved 23 May 2025.
^ "Young Stunners' new Album Rebirth is a must listen". Samaa TV.
^ "Open Letter - Talha Anjum [Album Review]".
^ "Open Letter Talha Anjum's album blend of hip-hop and Urdu poetry".
^ "Umair and Jokhay The man behind the rise of Talha Anjum amd Talha Younas".

There is a huge WP:WALLOFTEXT so I will only be addressing some of the main points. I wouldn't consider Young Stunners even notable despite having a Wikipedia page (that one needs to go to AfD as well). A single collaboration with a rapper is not something that gains inherent notability. Everything else is more of an WP:ILIKEIT argument. As far as the "landmark" albums you speak of, I would guess they would have enough coverage to warrant a Wikipedia page since they are landmark, yet I do not see it. Fact is, the coverage has some mentions, routine announcements, and unreliable sources (even a publication that is reliable like Dawn can have specific articles considered unreliable - see WP:NEWSORGINDIA). The rest of what you cited is not reliable (two blogs and Reddit?). If this artist was truly worthy of notice (a requirement of notability), there would be more than blog posts and promotional churnalism. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

CNMall41 This isn’t WP:ILIKEIT—his notability stems from his influence on multiple notable works. While some early coverage may be light or promotional, there is independent, reliable coverage (e.g., SAMAA TV, The Express Tribune, and Dawn articles/interviews) highlighting Umair’s production role. [3]. Behappyyar (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. The comment proves what I have been saying. You cite this which is a routine announcement and not-bylined. It is not reliable for the purpose of establishing notability. It is the same concept as WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Finally, please do not cite interviews anymore. They are not independent and cannot be used to establish notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

The link i have shared Umair slides into Genius Top Albums of the Year is not a routine announcement. It highlights Umair’s recognition by Genius alongside global artists like Beyoncé. This editorial coverage by a reliable source (The Express Tribune) goes beyond routine mentions and supports notability per WP:GNG. Behappyyar (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Already stated numerous times. It is NOT BYLINED and falls under similar concerns as WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Articles published under "news desk" or "webdesk" have consistently found to be unreliable for notability purposes as they are promotional churnalism, not something in-depth written by a journalist. Please see WP:CIR. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: would benefit from additional input. Contributors are also reminded to please refrain from using LLMs to generate walls of text, as they don't help anyone. Write your own arguments, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Weak Delete: I lean to agree with CNMall41; most of the articles with SIGCOV doesn't mention the author of the article, and all of them have promotional undertones. The Rolling Stones review is nice, checks all the boxes for a good sources (except the promotional vibes). If we can find another 2+ sources of the quality of this Rolling Stones article, we can save the article. This source also has a little bit specifically on Umair. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 16:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

I actually thought the Rolling Stone reference was okay, but when I looked closer during a WP:BEFORE, I saw it was Rolling Stone India which is not Rolling Stone and has different (if any) oversight authority. Should be treated similar to Forbes India or Entrepreneur India. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep. It seems that he meets WP:NSINGER criterion 2, having a single listed on a country's national music chart. 1 190.140.190.217 (talk) 22:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Draftify to modify sources: Having read the above discussions, read the article over and checked the sources, there are a few things that stand out to me. Firstly, the names of some of the article writers, namely refs 2, 5, 10 and 12, appear to not be the name of an actual person (Images Staff and Culture Haze). These sources are likely not bylined, as I believe has been mentioned previously. Secondly, ref 14 is a link to the artist's Spotify. Whilst Spotify isn't listed on WP:RS/PS, I would question whether it counts as a WP:RS. For these reasons, along with the article still potentially being a WP:Stub (it has the notice at the bottom of the article), I think that draftifying the article to take care of these issues would be beneficial in strengthening arguments for keep. 11WB (talk) 11:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Forever's End

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable ~~artist~~ film. Primary sourced promotion lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. Closest it gets is an interview with the director in a PRNEWSWIRE feed. No sign of any independent reviews, eg. Prod removed giving no helpful reason. (previous afd was for different subject) duffbeerforme (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete: I see nothing about this film, the name hits in Gbooks [4], but nothing about a film. AFFM Magazine is the closest to a RS we have, the rest aren't helpful (primary or non-RS). We don't have enough about this film. Oaktree b (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak keep. The sourcing isn't the greatest. I found a review from Film Threat. AMFM seems like they're probably OK - they're used as a source in this Taylor & Francis book as well as books from Palgrave Macmillan UK and Bloomsbury. It's been kind of difficult searching for verification on them due to their name throwing up a bunch of false positives, though. They've interviewed some pretty major people, one of which was highlighted by Blabbermouth, which I think is a RS on here, which is a good sign. The Fancine award isn't major enough to give total notability, but I think it would likely contribute towards it. With the two reviews, Fancine award, and some light coverage, I think this squeaks by NFILM. Not the strongest keep, but an OK one. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:14, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Shoot, I think the film was submitted through FT's review program and if so, that would make that unusable. Can anyone verify that? I am still leaning towards a weak keep based on the review and award, but it's tentative. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The Film Threat explicitly states "This film was submitted for review through our Submission for Review system." So, yes, unusable. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:47, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep Film Threat and AMFM reviews are reliable sources and that makes this pass WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 01:25, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment. Looking at the state of the source at the time of the above article, The problem is AMFM partners with PRNewswire with no indication of how and I see no sign of their editorial staff. What's PR and what's not? And where is their staff of writers, did they have anyone other than Bears Fonte? And this individual article, whilst filed in Movie Reviews, is actually an interview with the director so largely primary. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
It's changed since then but it still looks like they have only one writer. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

That's a good point. I didn't see that - I'm striking my argument. I'm going to see if there's a place to redirect this. It doesn't seem like it was classified as a horror film so List of horror films of 2013 isn't really a good fit. Dread Central is the only RS I've seen use the term horror, but I am hesitant to call this horror without the director/crew describing it as such. It looks like it was one of those films that never wanted to align itself with horror exactly and preferred to say it was more a drama or thriller. Maybe List_of_thriller_films_of_the_2010s#2013? There's the more general page of List of American films of 2013, but I've never had any sort of confirmation as to whether or not we can include non-notable films there. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Comment as article creator: This film (note: this is not an artist as per the nomination statement) is what we can consider "bubbling–under" notability. It has a singular notable cast member and has screened at the Austin Film Festival but not after five years. The director and other lead actress faded from existence, and no critical reviews at RT. I wrote the article after seeing the film, on Amazon IIRC, so considered it noteworthy enough if they streamed it.

Note to nominator: please be civil by notifying article creators when nominating anything at an XFD.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

When I went back the next day I saw that a bot had notified you so I left it like that, but my apologies for not notifying you earlier. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:29, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems unlikely that a consensus will develop to keep the article, but I don't see a consensus for deletion either.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Nick Knight (Forever Knight)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unreferenced article which is just an overlong plot synopsis without any further analysis. WP:FANCRUFT --wooden superman 07:41, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television. --wooden superman 07:41, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Though currently poorly sourced, I believe this character to be notable. The following (and possibly their reviews) could be used as sources:

Melton, J. Gordon (September 2010). The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead. Visible Ink Press. pp. 255–258. ISBN 978-1-57859-350-7.
Hoppenstand, Gary; Browne, Ray Broadus (1996). The Gothic World of Anne Rice. Popular Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-87972-708-6.
Grace, Angela (May 2011). Dark Angels Revealed. Fair Winds Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-1-59233-457-5.
Abbott, Stacey; Brown, Simon (Summer–Fall 2019). ""Let's Go to Work": The Legacy of Angel a Slayage Special Issue". Slayage. 17 (2): 1–18.
Garrett, Susan M. (1997). Forever Knight: Intimations of mortality. Boulevard Books. ISBN 9781572973138.
Sizemore, Susan (1997). Forever Knight: A stirring of dust. Boulevard Books. ISBN 9781572972384.
Hathaway-Nayne, Anne (1998). These Our Revels. Berkley Boulevard Books. ISBN 978-0-425-16491-4.
"Forever Knight". Epi-Log Magazine. No. 36. Nov 1993. pp. 4–11.
"Forever Knight". Epi-Log Magazine. No. 37. Dec 1993. pp. 29–35, 62.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

That's all very well, but none of these sources are used in the article, and all we have is WP:ALLPLOT. There is no analysis. Without access to these books, we cannot know if these sources discuss the subject in depth. --wooden superman 07:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting that the current state of the article is not a reason for deletion if the topic notable
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep I believe with the existing coverage in secondary sources a full article can be written, which fullfils both WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. E.g. The Gothic World of Anne Rice and Joss Whedon Vs. the Horror Tradition contain comparisons to other fictional characters and evaluation, i.e. information beyond plot summary. The fact that they have not yet been used in the article is not relevant based on WP:ARTN. Daranios (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Redirect for now. There is potential, but it is not shown at all in the article; plus potential does not mean the article can be written - sources above have not been shown to contain SIGCOV or go beyond plot summary; there are just, at this point, wishful thinking that maybe there's something useful in them. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Daranos' sources contain more than plot summaries. Likewise for The Vampire Book, The Gothic World of Anne Rice, and Dark Angels Revealed, as well as the Slayage article. Those all meet SIGCOV. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Redirect per Piotrus. I agree that the sources would not allow us to write a substantial article that meets WP:NOT. It may be borderline and I would also consider a merge. We need WP:SIGCOV to be able to write about reception and development of this character in the real world, not just recaps of how they appear in the fiction. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note: When specifying a !vote to redirect, you must include a link to the target article you are proposing a redirect to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Donn Favis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass WP:NPOL as an unelected member to a national body, and city council position is not inherently notable. Coverage all focuses on either failed congressional campaign or general coverage of the Marikina City Council. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Draftify and redirect to Marikina#Local government: Still a major figure in local politics; gaining notability in the foreseeable future is not out of the equation. On a related note, if that is the threshold, then Xyza Diazen should also be rediscussed.

TofuMuncher (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

@TofuMuncher if you want to take action on that page you can. Politicians have notability requirements, where if they hold a certain position they can be considered automatically notable, but they can still be notable if they have been the subject of significant coverage. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:06, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Electromagnetically enhanced Physical Vapor Deposition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page that describes (advertises) a not notable product by a company, used for Physical vapor deposition. The technique is standard, with a decent general page already at Low-energy plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, which is what the page was redirected to -- this company did not invent it and their technology is not special. An editor who is presumably not aware of the science/technology recreated the page. Going to AfD rather than an edit war. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Science, and Engineering. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Comment. Both the page (in its original and current version) as well as the companies web page fails to describe the method. The page has one reference to magnetron deposition in [5], which indicates that a standard plasma deposition method is used. There must be a plasma, as electromagnetic fields of course do not have any effect on neutral atoms. Both the original and current version are from a technical viewpoint at best a bit misleading. (Admittedly the reverting editor has probably never done thin film deposition work.) Ldm1954 (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete Lacking in independent sources that describe the process. This just seems to be a trademarked name of what may or may not be low-energy plasma enhanced CVD. Difficult to verify anything given the process's proprietary nature. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

KeepThere are independent coverages which helps establish the technology’s notability and neutral evaluation. For example, an article in The Globe and Mail provides coverage from a widely respected national newspaper and discusses Canadian defense technology and its international impact. Similarly, a piece on Global Defence Technology via NRIDigital offers an industry perspective that includes technical comparisons with traditional chrome plating—this demonstrates that the discussion of EPVD is carried out by independent experts rather than serving as self‐promotion.

Additional third‑party analysis is available from and Security, which supports the claims made in the article by providing market context and independent observations. Moreover, coverage by Shephard Media further reinforces the technology’s relevance by detailing how innovations like EPVD can enhance the longevity and precision of weapons systems. Beyond media coverage, government validation also substantiates EPVD’s impact. For instance, a SERDP/ESTCP fact sheetsupports this by offering government-backed details of the technology’s performance and significance. In addition, a contract listing on [5] shows that public sector interest and evaluations have been directed toward EPVD, addressing concerns about promotional bias through independent evidence.

Lastly, EPVD is clearly differentiated from other deposition methods such as low‑energy plasma‑enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In the wake of the EU’s ban on chrome plating, an analysis by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)indicates that EPVD has become a viable alternative to chrome plating.

Pointing that, I believe this article is neutral, independently verified and not an advertisement—and should remain active on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benyamin21 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments about the sources:

Is the discussion at The Globe and Mail in-depth? How many words are there about EPVD?
Global Defence Technology via NRIDigital is an interview of the CEO of Paradigm Shift Technologies, so much of it is not independent.
"and Security" link does not work.
Shephard Media is behind the paywall, but also seems like an interview of the CEO. How much information is there about the process?
The fact sheet does contain a short description of the process
contract listing is another 404
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) link takes me to some login page with no information about the process

84.251.164.143 (talk) 09:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

1. yes, at least 5 times

2. It is an interview by an independent news agency, not a self-published article

3. https://defenceandsecurity.ca/media/article&id=1013&t=m

4. The fact it is behind a paywall of a world-renowned publication proves that it is not a self-promoting or self-published article. It describes the process in detail

5. Yes, the fact sheet is on the official website of the US government and it clearly states the objective, description and benefits of EPVD technology.

6. https://www.highergov.com/contract/N6833520C0013/

This contract was awarded and the US NAVY clearly sites that this technology is an alternative to chrome plating for gun barrels.

7. ECHA has validated EPVD as an environmentally friendly commercially available viable alternative to chrome plating- their website requires cookies.

The primary distinction between Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) and Enhanced Physical Vapor Deposition (EPVD) lies in their application capabilities. PVD is limited to coating external surfaces and operates as a line-of-sight process, meaning it cannot effectively coat the interior of complex geometries, such as tubes or barrels with significant diameter-to-length ratios. In contrast, EPVD was specifically developed to address this limitation, enabling the application of coatings on the interior surfaces of tubes and barrels, even those with challenging geometries. This makes EPVD suited for applications where internal surface coatings are required, which PVD alone cannot achieve. Benyamin21 (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment. For now, there do not seem to be enough sources to write an article about the EPVD process (We don't really know what separates it from other PVD processes). As a product, I don't see that it would fulfill the strict requirements of WP:NPRODUCT either ("sustained coverage in reliable independent secondary sources"). Would the company be notable? 84.251.164.143 (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Comment. Perhaps there are adequate sources for an article about the company, and this info can be part of it? ScienceFlyer (talk) 07:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Ian Carry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article seems to be AI generated as many others by this user and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Even the primary sources do not support some of the claims in the article. C 679 04:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ireland. C 679 04:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep – Ian Carry meets WP:COACH through notable roles including head coach at NCAA Division I level, interim coach of a national team, goalkeeping coach of a national team, and current head coach of the U.S. Men's Beach Soccer National Team.[6][7] He has held multiple verified coaching and technical[8]positions at national and[9]collegiate levels.[10] The article is not AI-generated and is improvable. Wq4m820 (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 04:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep Notable as per reasons given by Wq4m820. I have no opinion on the AI issue. Sarah777 (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete – The sources provided by the article's creator are either primary ones or routine announcements. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment – Per WP:COACH, Ian Carry meets the inclusion criteria by virtue of serving as the head coach of the U.S. Men's Beach Soccer National Team (a national side under the U.S. Soccer Federation and FIFA-sanctioned discipline of soccer) and previously as head coach of the University of Kentucky women's soccer team (a NCAA Division I program) among other coaching roles (previously linked). "Coaches... are presumed notable if they have held the top position... at the national level." These positions are consistent with notability standards set for professional and national team coaches. However, I acknowledge that coverage is currently limited to primary sources (e.g., ussoccer.com, Kentucky, cmuchippewas). While these establish verifiability and roles held, it is difficult to locate multiple independent, reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage beyond basic announcements. Few found include 1. 2. 3. 4. (trivial) . 5. etc. If more sources are uncovered, they would strengthen the case for retention as done so already. In the meantime, the article is verifiable and improvable, and merits expansion rather than deletion (Additional secondary coverage, though limited, can be gradually incorporated). Wq4m820 (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I... can't understand these words. Passing and trivial mentions do not count towards notability. This definitely needs better source analysis from other users. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
As the article creator, if you're unable to "locate multiple independent, reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage beyond basic announcements", in the words you used, you shouldn't be creating articles. WP:V ≠ WP:N. And you can't vote twice. C 679 15:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Just to clarify, I didn’t intend to cast two votes, only to expand on my rationale. I’ll step back now and let the discussion focus on the article’s merits. Wq4m820 (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:45, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Battle of Zakho (1961)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. It's filled with puffery, and the only mention of the battle is "Zakho,[1] a key border town near the Turkish frontier, was among the most important early victories for the Kurds." Skitash (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Iraq. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

The first 2 sources that are cited here has not got anything to do with the battle, They talked about an internal rivalry in Zakho between the kurdish tribes fighting each other. on the other hand I checked the third source that was cited here as a "peshmaega (Kurdish) victory" but the source didn't support this claim at all, it has said the opposite, So there is a high POV pushing in this article, I support the Delete of this article for now, I will try my best to expand the article. R3YBOl (talk) 10:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: After checking all the sources, as I said previously I was thinking of expanding the article but it lacks of information, 6 sources were cited as the capture of a city. only one source has talked about the battle in detail which ended as a suppression of the rebels. I totally support the Deletion of this article per nom. R3YBOl (talk) 11:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

The first 3 sources do talk about it, and are related to it, i advise you to closely look at them again and you will see that it's useless for the page being deleted 185.244.153.200 (talk) 13:37, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Actually the first 2 sources talk about a kurdish tribes conflict Mustafa barzani, zebari, and harki tribes. The third source claims Iraqi victory R3YBOl (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Note:Another article here "Barzani's jash campaign" literally describe the same event of the same battle. I don't know why does this article exist R3YBOl (talk) 06:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep : This article has sources but they have no page numbers or quotes. Better to keep, reword and clean up the cites.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Trevor Casper

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tragic but WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTMEMORIAL apply. Sadly law enforcement die while doing their jobs too often. Lost in Quebec (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Wisconsin. Lost in Quebec (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to Wisconsin State Patrol#Fallen officers Noting a possible COI as the subject and I may have crossed paths at the college we attended, but never spoke. I do think with only eight officers of note who died in the line of duty, it would be proper to expand the section regarding their deaths in the WSP article, including Casper's, but the circumstances of his death and youth should result in a redirect to his agency at minimum. Otherwise I do share the nom's issues regarding this being more of a memorial page than a bio. Nathannah • 📮 23:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Tory Green (entrepreneur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sigcov in the article or after a Google search. It doesn't seem like this guy or his blockchain company meet GNG. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep meets GNG as subject has received substantial coverage specifically in Korean and Chinese language multiple reliable media sources, TV programs, etc. Those newspapers coverage goes well beyond routine business appointments. Also his role as CEO of io.net also adds to the notability. He also worked on top positions for big firms (Disney, Oaktree Capital, Merrill Lynch) and the not all sources were added.--Mozzcircuit (talk) 13:15, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Notability isn't inherited from being CEO of a company or being an executive at other companies. If there are reliable sources like newspapers, it would help to share them here. I couldn't find them by searching and they aren't in the article, so no one here can assess them. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:12, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep passes GNG thanks to multiple independent reliable sources available and added. The Subject is CEO of a notable tech company with substantial media coverage.--Slarticlos (talk) 14:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Can you share some of these sources or add them to the article to help improve it? BuySomeApples (talk) 01:12, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Does not meet the GNG. I've gone through all the sources in the article and summarized my results in the table below. Toadspike [Talk] 23:43, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
[11]	Obviously promotional tone			✘ No
[12]	Interview			✘ No
[13]		Written by an "independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program"		✘ No
[14]	Seems to be based entirely on a company press release.			✘ No
[15]		No byline	~ One paragraph on Green, probably not sigcov.	? Unknown
[16]			No information on Green beyond the fact that he was appointed.	✘ No
[17]	An opinion piece written by Green himself.		Doesn't contain any info about Green.	✘ No
[18]			Just some quotes from Green, no indep. sigcov.	✘ No
[19]			Less than a sentence is about Green.	✘ No
[20]	Clearly a recycled press release.	No byline.		✘ No
[21]			No sigcov of Green, simply says that he was appointed and includes a quote from him.	✘ No
[22]			Doesn't say much beyond that Green was appointed CEO.	✘ No
[23]		Seems to be a wire report based entirely on press releases; strongly promotional tone.		✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

@Mozzcircuit, you say "not all sources were added". Do you have further sources beyond what I reviewed above? Toadspike [Talk] 23:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Connor Gordon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. JTtheOG (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. Let'srun (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Tanner Hummel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Georgia (U.S. state). JTtheOG (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Andy Contreras

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. JTtheOG (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Jad Arslan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Georgia (U.S. state). JTtheOG (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Nick Wells (soccer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Georgia (U.S. state). JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Scott DeVoss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Kansas. JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Brandon Clagette

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Georgia (U.S. state). JTtheOG (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Alexi Jaimes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. JTtheOG (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Jackson Jellah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Ivory Coast, Arizona, and Oregon. JTtheOG (talk) 01:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Casey Penland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and North Carolina. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Félicien Dumas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, France, and Indiana. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Alex Bobocea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted to waste time. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and New York. JTtheOG (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Isaiah Dargan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted. No changes to career since PROD. In fact, he has since retired and begun coaching. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Ronaldo Lomeli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted. No changes in career since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Cole McLagan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Mindlessly undeleted. No changes since PROD. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Missouri. JTtheOG (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- You only waited 16 minutes to nominate for deletion, so that renders the suggestion "no changes since PROD" as irrelevant. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
  @Graeme Bartlett: My apologies. I meant no changes in his career and thus no changes in the amount/depth of coverage available. JTtheOG (talk) 03:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT nor WP:GNG. The unPROD request was multiple and was based purely on who had requested the PRODs (and even then was in error, accidentally undeleting other pages too). No objection was given, nor any dispute that the subject is simply not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:SIRS so fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. However, I am very concerned about the number and speed of AFDs from this editor, especially given that some were mere minutes after the article was restored. WP:BEFORE is crucial. Giant Snowman 11:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Neuron (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV for this blockchain company, even after searching for stuff under the founders' names and different variations of the company's name. The sources are all primary sources or routine coverage in unreliable sources. Not really anything that meets WP:GNG. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet, and United Kingdom. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Aviation, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete: The article is based on non-reliable sources, and not a single reference appears to be strong or convincing. If anyone comes across any reliable and in-depth coverage related to this topic, please do ping me, I'd be happy to reconsider my decision. Thank you! Baqi:) (talk) 07:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep: I’ve noticed that several of the sources included incorrect or broken URLs. I’ve corrected these where possible and removed any uncredited information. I hope this helps strengthen the article. Thank you! Lexiconia (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
That is usually a sign that the article was written by some AI. Polygnotus (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable company, does not meet WP:NCOMPANY or WP:GNG. Polygnotus (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Saints Peter and Paul Church (Chernivtsi)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the references of the article are mostly generated using ChatGPT. Vinizex94🌍 01:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Vinizex94🌍 01:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete - and possibly a speedy delete under {{db-g7}}, as the creating editor has brought the article to AfD. Article was created using unchecked LLM output (see [24]) so content cannot be trusted to be accurate. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Forced orgasm

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to be notable. Kinkly looks like a healthline-like site, i.e. unreliable. The Guardian article doesn't mention this and isn't even about it. A search on google scholar shows only passing mentions and unreliable sources. A search on google news does not bring up significant reliable coverage either. KnowDeath (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

The previous discussion on this contains no convincing arguments in favour of keeping. KnowDeath (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete - WP:INDISCRIMINATE: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is not merely mentioning that this practice exists. This is a mini-instruction guideline with explicit instructions and images of how to do this. — Maile (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

List of endemic flora of Indonesia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list article was started in 2011 and not much worked on after. A number of species on the list have since been renamed. A number of species are not confined to Indonesia. The basis of the list, being endemic to such a large and diverse country as Indonesia, seems contradictory to endemism's usually limited scope. There are numerous large islands of high endemism and biodiversity in the country: e.g. Sumatra, Borneo, New Guinea etc., for which there are appropriate categories, e.g. Category:Flora of Sumatra and which could form the basis of better list articles. Declangi (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Indonesia. Shellwood (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete just a list, which is almost the same as the category list. --Moem-Meom (talk) 00:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

[1] "Indian rapper asks 'Talha Kaun?', Talha Anjum responds with a brutal diss track". Images.Dawn.com. Dawn Media Group. 21 May 2025. Retrieved 23 May 2025.

[2] "Young Stunners' new Album Rebirth is a must listen". Samaa TV.

[3] "Open Letter - Talha Anjum [Album Review]".

[4] "Open Letter Talha Anjum's album blend of hip-hop and Urdu poetry".

[5] "Umair and Jokhay The man behind the rise of Talha Anjum amd Talha Younas".

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]