Jump to content

User:Adam/dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gale warning. (Moderate to high level of vandalism)

4.05 RPM according to DeadbeefBot16:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC) change

Topics in the news

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o in 2012
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Business and economy

  • South Korea’s central bank cuts its key interest rate by a quarter percentage point to 2.5%, marking its fourth cut since October, and sharply lowered its 2025 growth forecast to 0.8%, nearly halving the previous projection of 1.5% announced in February after a monetary policy meeting. Share prices rise following the report, with the Kospi gaining 1.7%. (AP)

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

From today's featured article

GL Mk. II transmitter van
GL Mk. II transmitter van

Radar, Gun Laying, Mark I, or GL Mk. I for short, was an early World War II radar system developed by the British Army to provide information for anti-aircraft artillery. There were two upgrades, GL/EF (elevation finder) and GL Mk. II (pictured), both improving the ability to determine a target's bearing and elevation. GL refers to the radar's ability to direct the guns onto a target, known as gun laying. The first GL sets were developed in 1936 using separate transmitters and receivers mounted on gun carriages. Several were captured in 1940, leading the Germans to believe falsely that British radar was much less advanced than theirs. The GL/EF attachment provided bearing and elevation measurements accurate to about a degree: this caused the number of rounds needed to destroy an aircraft to fall to 4,100, a tenfold improvement over early-war results. The Mk. II, which was able to directly guide the guns, lowered the rounds-per-kill to 2,750. About 410 Mk. Is and 1,679 Mk. IIs were produced. (Full article...)

Did you know ...

Lieke Klaver ahead in the women's 400 metres final
Lieke Klaver ahead in the women's 400 metres final

Good article nominations
List of the oldest ten nominations that have had no activity (placed on hold, under review or requesting a 2nd opinion)
  1. Parabolic subgroup of a reflection group (talk | history | start review) (270 days)
  2. Muhammad Yunus (talk | history | start review) (223 days)
  3. Daredevil (Marvel Comics character) (talk | history | start review) (222 days)
  4. Angela Alsobrooks (talk | history | start review) (212 days)
  5. Pinmonkey (talk | history | start review) (212 days)
  6. Transport in Penang (talk | history | start review) (212 days)
  7. Halimah Yacob (talk | history | start review) (210 days)
  8. Cameron Echols-Luper (talk | history | start review) (209 days)
  9. Charlie Gehringer (talk | history | start review) (209 days)
  10. Turkey Stearnes (talk | history | start review) (209 days)
Nominations that have been marked requesting a second opinion for 7 days or longer.
  1. Interstate 85 in North Carolina (talk | history | discuss review) (91 days)

Discussion

[edit]

Help noticeboards

[edit]
Help desk (38 threads)
Media copyright questions (9 threads)
Teahouse (47 threads)

Village pump

[edit]
Village Pump (policy) (4 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (19 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (15 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (12 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (7 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (11 threads)

Other

[edit]
Requests for adminship


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Recent RfA, RfBs, and admin elections (update)
Candidate Type Result Date of close Tally
S O N %
Rusalkii RfA Successful 23 Apr 2025 156 0 0 100
EggRoll972 RfA No consensus 19 Apr 2025 110 57 10 66
LaundryPizza03 RfA Unsuccessful 17 Apr 2025 72 81 26 47
Goldsztajn RfA Successful 23 Mar 2025 136 1 4 99
Barkeep49 RfB Successful 7 Mar 2025 219 5 8 98
Giraffer RfA Successful 1 Mar 2025 221 0 1 100
Requests for comments

For links directly to each current RFC see the navigational template below. For a listing with a brief introduction to each ongoing debate, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All.

Requests for third opinion


  1. Talk:Community care access centres § Removal of lists. Disagreement about where the article should include lists of community care access centres.18:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)