Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o in 2012
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


June 1

[edit]

May 31

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

  • Bulgaria and the euro
  • More than 60 United Nations offices and agencies are requested to propose staff cuts of 20% by mid-June due to a funding shortfall, affecting around 14,000 positions. This includes staff from humanitarian offices, agencies supporting refugees, and other critical sectors. (AP)

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


PSG win the Champions League final

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 UEFA Champions League final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Paris Saint-Germain defeat Inter Milan 5–0 to win the final of the Champions League. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In association football, Paris Saint-Germain win the UEFA Champions League, defeating Inter Milan in the final (man of the match Désiré Doué pictured).
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Abcmaxx (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The article needs significant work before posting, a post-match section needs to be added while expansion is required for the route to the final and pre-match. The background section is also largely unsoured. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Article not ready Some section is lacking in content. Conditional strong support once article is ready.INeedSupport :3 21:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Always loves the fact Abcmaxx always WP:IDHT, adds the final score of the match, and some stupid trivia (if applicable) about the match instead of suggesting the usual boring blurb formula we use for such events. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Josep-Lluís Serrano Pentinat becomes new Andorran co-prince

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Josep-Lluís Serrano Pentinat (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Josep-Lluís Serrano Pentinat (pictured) becomes the new Episcopal Co-Prince of Andorra. (Post)
News source(s): El Periòdic d'Andorra
Credits:

Article needs updating

 Tofusaurus (talk) 13:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support A change in the position of the co-prince of Andorra is rare, and this change roughly occurs every two to three decades. CastleFort1 (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This probably should not be ITNR, as the co-prince is not the position that administers the executive of the govt per our table. Masem (t) 15:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The 2 princes are heads of state (1278 treaty Bishop of Urgell and Count of Foix then Count of Foix became King of France 1589 so inherited by French Crown then French Presidency) Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The underlying table List of current heads of state and government lists the PM as the one that wields executive power, neither either co-prince. Masem (t) 17:09, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral The change in heads of state in systems where this figure does not have executive powers, such as the case of Andorra as the Co-Prince Episcopal refers to, is not ITNR. However, given that the last time such a succession occurred was 22 years ago and is not common (but ordinary), it might be ITN-interesting. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support change of head of state has precedent This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 30

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Abdul Ismail

[edit]
Article: Abdul Ismail (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hindu
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian cricketer, article meets all requirements. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: John E. Thrasher

[edit]
Article: John E. Thrasher (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Florida State University News
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former member of the Florida Senate and president of Florida State University240F:7A:6253:1:2407:E118:EDC8:D359 (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Mokwa flood

[edit]
Article: 2025 Mokwa flood (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 175 people are killed and hundreds of others are missing after flooding submerges the town of Mokwa in Niger State, Nigeria. (Post)
News source(s): Deccan Herald Al Jazeera
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Significant disaster which has been reported on internationally. Bloxzge 025 ツCanada 12:45 PM, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

@Orbitalbuzzsaw There was no need for that 2nd part of the message. ITN is pretty well known for being WP:NOTNEWS, so why phrase it like ITN is going through something akin to a slow news cycle? Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fakescientist8000 because the “sports bad” crowd has to make sure we all know their opinion. The Kip (contribs) 03:41, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 29

[edit]

Business and economy

  • Economy of South Korea
    • South Korea’s central bank cuts its key interest rate by a quarter percentage point to 2.5%, marking its fourth cut since October, and sharply lowered its 2025 growth forecast to 0.8%, nearly halving the previous projection of 1.5% announced in February after a monetary policy meeting. Share prices rise following the report, with the Kospi gaining 1.7%. (AP)

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Loretta Swit

[edit]
Article: Loretta Swit (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-31/mash-actor-loretta-swit-dies-aged-87/105361342
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American actor mostly known for her work on M*A*S*H HiLo48 (talk) 01:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose As much as I love M*A*S*H, this article has way too many unsourced statements for the main page. Ping me if this issue gets fixed, because I would be happy to support once that happens. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not Ready for the usual reason. I was going to nominate this last night, but when I looked at the article I realized it's in really rough shape as far as referencing goes. There are entire sections w/o any sources. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bernard Kerik

[edit]
Article: Bernard Kerik (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Economic Times
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: NYPD Commissioner during 9/11 Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Humphries' Triple Crown

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Luke Humphries (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Luke Humphries wins the Premier League of Darts, becoming only the fourth player to win the Professional Darts Corporation Triple Crown (World Championship, World Matchplay and Premier League). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Luke Humphries (pictured) wins the Premier League of Darts, becoming the fourth player to achieve the Triple Crown.
News source(s): https://www.rte.ie/sport/darts/2025/0529/1515807-humphries-beats-littler-to-claim-triple-crown/
Credits:
Article updated

Nominator's comments: Obviously a triple crown is a de facto big deal in any sport, but this one has come as quite the development in the ongoing battle for dominance in darts between 30 year old Luke Humphries (world number one) and 18 year old Luke Littler (current world champion). With the latter having been favourite to win the Premier League this year after setting numerous tournament records including his 45 point winning total, Humphries trailed in a distant second (34 points), but still far ahead of the rest of the field (26 amd below). All other players at this elite world level, including multiple former world champions and one of the other three Triple Crown winners, are currently, and perhaps for a very long time yet, frankly just spectators to this Lukeopoly. 2A02:C7C:DA04:1200:F642:9179:DA3A:29EA (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The 'Triple Crown' isn't a thing in Darts. I don't know if the PDC are trying to market it as such, but there are several other tournaments which are considered to be more prestigious that the PL, which is a glorified exbo with only a few invited participants. Effy Midwinter (talk) 00:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Our article of Professional Darts Corporation Triple Crown would say otherwise. No idea if this is notable/significant for ITN, however. Natg 19 (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose good faith nom, but not ITNR and not notable. More suitable for DYK. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sports things that aren't listed at ITNR doesn't mean that an ITNC can still be discussed, but the importance has to stand on its own. The fact we have an article on the triple crown for darts suggests the achievement is notable. Masem (t) 15:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If a sporting event isn't ITNR, it's probably not ITN-worthy. And having an article doesn't mean it deserves it either. At no point have I said that it cannot be discussed. Humphries is the "fourth" player to win the Triple Crown, not even the first; darts is a very minority sport, and this achievement has barely received any coverage from the international sports press. Perhaps that's appropriate for DYK, but nothing more. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Tshenuwani Farisani

[edit]
Article: Tshenuwani Farisani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Zoutnet
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 12:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Rajesh

[edit]
Article: Rajesh (Tamil actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 240F:7A:6253:1:60F4:A537:FB68:A375 (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 28

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Closed) 2025 UEFA Conference League final

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2025 UEFA Conference League final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In association football, Chelsea F.C. win the UEFA Conference League and become the first team in history to win all four European club football competitions (Post)
Alternative blurb: Chelsea F.C. win UEFA Conference League becoming the first football club to win all four major European trophies
Alternative blurb II: English club Chelsea F.C. win UEFA Conference League and become first team in history to win every major international trophy, UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup, and UEFA Europa League.
News source(s): Skysports
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Trophy win on its own is not significant, but the context of being the first team ever to win all UEFA European club competitions makes it a worthy ITN candidate. Others can suggest alternative blurbs. Heatrave (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the blurb makes it seem like more of an achievement than it is, it’s the third tier of European football, most top teams want to avoid it. Seems more like a novelty than an achievement. Interesting but maybe not ITN worthy Kowal2701 (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support blurb Chelsea are the first team EVER to win all the international trophies 185.34.130.25 (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support Alternative blurb cheers to Chelsea!! They're first club in history to win every European major honour. Congratulations CFC QalasQalas (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose largely per Masem, not seeing any evidence that this particular combination of achievements has much standalone enduring notability, and the nomination statement even concedes that the Trophy win on its own is not significant. According to NYT/The Athletic, this tournament has only been around four years (also meaning this combination of achievements has only been possible in the last four years), which is far less than what is typically seen of those at WP:ITNR#Sports. Left guide (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I've protected a couple of Chelsea images in case this gains support. Schwede66 02:49, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Great!! QalasQalas (talk) 03:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose If Jaga or Djurgården had won it it would have been a major achievement. But a middling Super League Premier League team against an average La Liga side where the sides from the top 5 leagues already hover up all the money and best players, including the Champions League and Europa League, this third-tier cup is even less notable than the Intertoto at this point. Chelsea winning a new cup that's added every few years or so is no more than trivia. Abcmaxx (talk) 05:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Winning UEFA Conference League is not significant but being the first club to win all European cups. QalasQalas (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    But this is an ever growing list of irrelevant cups, and Chelsea won most of their trophies whilst being bankrolled by a very shady Russian billionaire. They only won this particular cup because it was a cup designed to bridge the gap between the top leagues and give some other clubs from other nations a chance, such as NK Celje for example. The competition was intentionally weaker, and Chelsea's league position shows that this season they would have only been able to compete for lesser trophies. Abcmaxx (talk) 06:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Short prose for the match summary. 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗷𝗮𝘆𝗮𝟲𝟳 (talk). 07:49, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is not a new achievement. Four clubs (Juventus, Manchester United, Ajax, and Bayern Munich) have won all three previous iterations of the tournaments (European Cup/Champions League, UEFA Cup, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup). Our article is misleading here, because effectively the Conference League is a rebranding of the Cup-winners Cup. The Europa Conference League has only existed for four years (and one could argue that the Europa League has as well, though that was a rebranding). Indeed, there can't be that many teams that have even played in all three current tournaments. Black Kite (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Europe's third-tier football competition, for clubs who finished 6th or 7th in their domestic leagues, or were eliminated in qualifiers for bigger competitions. I just saw that Chelsea's prize money for this whole tournament was only marginally more than Slovan Bratislava, who lost all eight of their games in the Champions League. So not even UEFA see this as a big deal. Looking at how mediocre you have to be to even get into this competition, I'm sorry but this achievement is as trivial as Coventry City being the only team to have played in every English league division in history (including Third Division North and South) Unknown Temptation (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chelsea is the first club to have won every major international trophy, UEFA Conference League, UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup, and UEFA Europa League. Dhool Geelle (talk) 11:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The claim that they're the first club with wins in all four major European competitions is factually incorrect. Juventus did the same by winning the UEFA Intertoto Cup in 1999 after they had previously won trophies in the UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup and UEFA Cup Winners' Cup.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exactly. If we count that one, Valencia have also won trophies in four different European competitions, but I didn't mention it because they've never won the European Champion Clubs' Cup/UEFA Champions League as top-flight European competition.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Intertoto Cup is not a "major" European competition, it is a minor one. Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Who's to say? It takes the same below UEFA Cup/Europa League places to qualify for it. Apart from the length of the campaign , they are similar. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted as blurb) RD/Blurb: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Kenyan writer and activist Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o (pictured) dies at the age of 87. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News: Giant of African literature Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o dies aged 87
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o was considered a giant of African literature (BBC News, Encyclopedia Britannica: Ngugi wa Thiong’o...considered East Africa's leading novelist, Cambridge Scholars Publishing : "the leading man of letters from East Africa and one of the most significant writers from the postcolonial world", NPR: "a perennial favorite for the Literature Nobel") and was extremely influential in the postcolonialism movement; in my opinion he is not a bad candidate for a blurb. Jaguarnik (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Kowal2701; Orbitalbuzzsaw, please stop pushing the false claim that WP:ITNRDBLURB is only about politicians. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Blurb in terms of notability. Titanic figure in African literature, in particular due to his promotion of writing in local languages. Quality may need a final polish, but article overall looks good. Khuft (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD Unsure if the African figure has an important figure similar to President or other head of state regarding his/her death, but the posting as RD makes it more necessary for me. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 21:47, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
'The African figure'? 'his/her death'? Try actually reading the article before commenting, so that you are aware of basic facts like the subject's name and gender. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is a good example of why 'old man dies' isn't much of an argument. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Post-posting Support blurb. BilboBeggins (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mohammed Said Hersi Morgan

[edit]
Article: Mohammed Said Hersi Morgan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Radio Dalsan
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Late general he was veteran during Siad Barre rule QalasQalas (talk) 20:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support A well-known Somali military official. Article looks fine and well-sourced. 185.34.130.25 (talk) 22:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support well covered and well sourced Dhool Geelle (talk) 11:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: QalasQalas (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Per Nørgård

[edit]
Article: Per Nørgård (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FAZ (in German), Gramophone
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Danish composer Grimes2 12:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Widely-known Danish classical composer. Article is fine and well-sourced. NeoGaze (talk) 13:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I came to nominate after updating a bit. Above, I added two names of editors who made this article what it is: fine quality. I also added an obit in English above (because more people will be able to read it than German or Danish). The composer was one of the giants in classical music. His works should have better articles. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ōnosato Daiki promotion to yokozuna

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Ōnosato Daiki (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ōnosato Daiki (pictured) becomes sumo's 75th yokozuna. (Post)
News source(s): [1][2]
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 KTC (talk) 07:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 27

[edit]

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Willie Stevenson

[edit]
Article: Willie Stevenson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death announced 27 May. Needs a few more citations but other than that the article is good. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ed Gale

[edit]
Article: Ed Gale (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety TMZ
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: He was the body (but not the voice) of Howard the Duck and was Chucky in the first three Child's Play movies. 128.91.40.237 (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Freddie Aguilar

[edit]
Article: Freddie Aguilar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Manila Standard, ABS-CBN News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 ROY is WAR Talk! 03:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Visit to Canada

[edit]
Article: 2025 royal tour of Canada (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ King Charles III visits Canada and delivers a speech from the throne to open the 45th Canadian Parliament.
News source(s): https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/king-charles-delivers-throne-speech-1.7544242
Credits:

 TimeEngineer (talk) 08:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • I respect your view, but this is (a) not about Trump (and the coverage is mostly not about him), and (b) not routine. The last time the Monarch gave a speech from the Throne in Canada was 50 years ago, and the last time a King or Queen visited was 2010. Its not a frequent occurrence. TimeEngineer (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see what you mean about Trump, that's my fault as I mostly consume american news. I nevertheless think that the first clause is a reason enough to oppose. It seems more likely to fall under "huh, that's interesing" rather than "this will have long-term conseuqences". It might make a good DYK though. –DMartin 09:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Twice a century for the King of Canada to do this? I'd hardly call that routine. Heck, it's the first time a King has done it - the other two were by the Queen. Nfitz (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose notable? Like any visit by a Head of State to another country, especially if it is by a monarch. Routine? Also, it is one of the functions that HoS should perform. It's not ITN-worthy just because of the latter and if it has anything to do with Trump it's totally irrelevant and just another part of the political drama of his administration's bid to annex Canada. _-_Alsor (talk) 09:26, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The visit is certainly in the news but it's still ongoing and the King opens the Canadian parliament today, which is the main event. Updates to the article are needed as the plans turn into history. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. The Kip (contribs) 15:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support, but as blurb because it is basically already over. With respect, many of the oppose rationales are not policy-based, and likely come from editors who are simply associating the visit with Trump as opposed to fully appreciating the once in a lifetime nature of the event. In my view, it surpasses the notability threshold for two reasons: (a) even in spite of the Trump aspect, it is a historic, once in a lifetime type of thing (the last time this happened was in 1977, so claims above that it is 'routine' are objectively incorrect) and (b) it is getting objectively widespread, in depth coverage amongst global reliable sources: from publications in the UK, Australia, the USA, China, France, Germany, I could go on. Very little of this coverage is 100% focused on Trump, and he is not even involved in the event, so WP:NTRUMP does not apply. FlipandFlopped 18:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose WP:NTRUMP also applies to any public figure or institution that is influential enough to the point that the press reports their every single movement. Completely non-notable visit. — EF5 18:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Above, I hyperlinked publications like the New York Times, the South China Morning Post, Le Monde, and Spiegel, who each have indepth reporting on this visit. Do you have evidence to back your claim that they "report on the every single movement" of King Charles III? The opposite seems true to me - many of those outlets rarely report on King Charles's goings-on, but this is so notable that they have made an exception. FlipandFlopped 18:49, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Flipandflopped, I'll formulate a response shortly, but I highly suggest you strike the and likely come from Americans who are simply associating the visit with Trump as opposed to fully appreciating the once in a lifetime nature of the event part of your statement. It's completely inappropriate to discount votes because they are of a certain demographic and speculating on the nationality of editors can constitute WP:OUTING. — EF5 19:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • Let's turn down the temperature a bit. In no conceivable way did I violate WP:OUTING, and I never said anyone's votes should be discounted. I respectfully stated an opinion that the WP:NTRUMP rationales were coming from an overly American perspective, which was not intended to be derogatory at all. FlipandFlopped 19:27, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
          • You did not say that WP:NTRUMP rationales were coming from an overly American perspective, you said the editors themselves are Americans who are simply associating the visit with Trump, which is assuming every oppose voter is American and is, as I stated, inappropriate. Thank you for changing it, though. — EF5 19:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support, given that King Charles is quite ill, and any major foreign visit by him is quite unusual. Nsk92 (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A visit of the King of Canada to Canada isn't a foreign visit. For the same reason that Canada doesn't have an embassy in the UK. Nfitz (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    has a High Commission in London though which serves the same function. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose as unimportant national-level address. If NTRUMP doesn't apply, then this was not notable to begin with. The relevant essay would be NCHARLES, correct? Departure– (talk) 19:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm going to add that I don't see how this is notable in of itself. The real story here is the opening of the Canadian parliament, but that's not ITNR and a done deal given the election.
    To clarify my other reason, I take it that this is getting a lot of coverage due to the context that this is taking place during Trump's second coming, but a lot of the folks I see giving rationales on coverage also reject NTRUMP having any bearing. It's established that it's only an essay, but the underlying truth is still there, and that is that material can be substantially overreported on occasion, and given how this has to do with both the King of England and Donald Trump, this easily is covered by it. Simply put, if Trump was not involved, at least for context, then there would be substantially less coverage and this would likely not have been nominated, let alone posted.
    I can't see how this is any more notable than any other "rare" event. Just because something hasn't happened in a while doesn't automatically make it notable. I'm really not seeing how this is notable; Charles made a speech, and that was that. Departure– (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such person as the King of England, and there hasn't been since William III died. There is, however, such a person as the King of Canada, and this story is about him. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The visit has been completed, widely reported and the article updated. Essays are irrelevant per WP:ESSAY, "Essays have no official status and do not speak for the Wikipedia community..." Andrew🐉(talk) 22:53, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Is this a !vote on quality or notability? Departure– (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ITN deals in quality and significance, not notability. My !vote follows on my earlier comment and addresses both and more besides. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning oppose on importance. BD2412 T 22:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm not seeing why this deserves a blurb. Heads of state visit other countries all the time, and we almost never post them, so what makes this one so much more important that it deserves to be posted? QuicoleJR (talk) 23:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Maybe grounds for a future DYK, but ultimately it’s just a head of state visiting part of their realm. Not remotely newsworthy internationally any more so than if the Danish monarch visited Greenland, the Japanese emperor visited the Ryukyus, or the French President visited Guadeloupe. RPH (talk) 01:12, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support it is a momentous occasion for the country to have the monarch open Parliament as King of Canada - the first King (male sovereign) to do so and only the third time in the country's history; Canada has a long and complicated relationship with the monarchy, and this move is a clear and decisive statement that Canada will be taking a turn away from the "post-national state" towards embracing a nationalist model of "three founding peoples: indigenous, French, and British", as PM Carney indicated in his inaugural speech. Most people are surprised to learn that Canada is a kingdom, this was not the visit of a foreign head of state as some are saying. This is a deciding point in the country's national narrative and evolution, as the previous two throne speeches by Elizabeth were. There is a throne speech at every new Parliament - meaning there have been 45 throne speeches in the country's history, 42 of which were delivered by Governors General. This is not just another royal visit but rather notable because the King is filling a constitutional role rather than merely meeting and greeting. The country is at an inflection point with new separatist movements rising in the West, meanwhile there is a kind of realignment apparently happening in Quebec after decades of separatism there. It is a chance to shine a light on this pivotal moment in the country's history, and there will likely be a "before" and an "after" for this historic constitutional, identitarian, and political moment-Larineso (talk) 05:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose lack of a demonstrated long term impact. (t · c) buidhe 05:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose un-elected head of state with no de facto power flies over on a tax-funded private jet for a formality and is present only due to a historical anachronism. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. IDB.S (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose simply a standard steps part of Canada's political system. Nothing unusual here. Masem (t) 12:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Factually incorrect. "No monarch had bothered to make this trip for nearly 50 years." according to The Guardian, 29 May. 2A02:C7C:DA04:1200:F642:9179:DA3A:29EA (talk) 21:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just because the monarchy neglected this aspect doesn't make it untrue. If anything it shows how little they matter politically given this fact. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral, leaning oppose - There's a lot of misleading commentary about this. It's significant, and I don't want to dismiss it out of hand, but we don't generally report on, say, the State of the Union address. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This event was highly unusual and very significant for a number of reasons. To quote the Guardian of 29 May....
  • "This week, however, the modern British monarchy has stood up and demanded to be counted, doing something new and perhaps genuinely consequential."
  • "No monarch had bothered to make this trip for nearly 50 years."
  • [The speech had a] "far looser and more personal format than the Westminster version ... allowed the king to speak words that clearly mattered to him, and by which he will be judged."
  • "The larger point, however, is that this was a willed act by the king. Charles did not have to travel and did not have to make the speech. But he did both, even while continuing to be treated for cancer.....The contrast with his mother is impossible to miss. Elizabeth II’s hallmark throughout her 70-year reign was a studied neutrality on public affairs. She was much praised for it during her lifetime, leading some commentators to assume that neutrality was now a precondition for monarchy’s survival"
  • "So far, Charles has gotten away with it. Public concern for his own health, and for that of his family, has probably helped him. So has public sympathy over the behaviour of the Sussexes. To criticise Trump is also popular rather than risky. Amid all this, the public has cut Charles enough slack to be more himself. Those who warned that his more committed approach to public affairs could threaten the monarchy and boost republicanism have, at least at this stage, been proved wrong."
  • "Charles’s role carries risks which, when faced with a less patient public mood or different circumstances, could cause trouble for him and for the monarchy. Assuming that Charles remains in good health for years to come, how might he handle a change of government? If the current feeding frenzy about a Nigel Farage prime ministership really came to pass in 2028-29, Charles could be faced with a government that might embrace a Maga president in Washington, abandon European alliances, dismiss the net zero agenda, and go out of its way to antagonise Scotland and Wales."
In summary, the Government of Canada and the King of Canada together chose to turn what has for decades been a ceremonial and scripted study of constitutional neutrality into an overtly political and personal act in response to Trump's rhetoric. Potentially changing the nature of the monarchy in the United Kingdom forever, even though the UK government (in all likelihood) had zero input into this whole affair; certainly having no powers of veto on grounds of their own national interest.
On the flip side, it *was* just a speech and it *was* basically about Trump (even though he wasn't even mentioned in it).
Hopefully that clears things up for all those above who seem to be wholly misinformed on the importance and significance angles of this event. Or indeed didn't even seem to understand the (admittedly complex) relationship between the British Monarchy and the democratically elected governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, and all their associated nations, provinces and territories.
In short, the unelected monarch King Charles III is still the Head of State of Canada, as ridiculous as that sounds to many people. And rather than shy away from it, the de facto Head of State of the very clearly sovereign democratic country of Canada has decided to lean into this historical anachronism to defend Canada's enduring sovereignty against the equally ridiculous territorial claims of the United States. In the process potentially causing various domestic and international difficulties for the very country in which King Charles III spends most of his time in.
That alone probably elevates this above the usual circus that surrounds Trump. It's certainly a unique reaction to Trump's Presidency, one that no other country can really make use of, except of course the 13 others who have Charles III as their Head of State. 2A02:C7C:DA04:1200:F642:9179:DA3A:29EA (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your post is far too long, but its premise is false anyway. King Charles doesn't carry any political risk apart from abolition of the monarchy. This non-event has been overreported, and going around and giving speeches is one of his core duties, but even then if he couldn't attend for whatever reason or simply didn't feel like it, he doesn't have to; there would be no real consequences either way. Abcmaxx (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"King Charles doesn't carry any political risk apart from abolition of the monarchy.". Well yes, that's the point. As is the fact he did bother this time. This was a significant and highly unusual move by both the Canadian government and the current head of a monarchy covering 16 nations. As such it inevitably became a much discussed reaction to one of Trump's most absurd talking points, rather than the non-attended act of bland ceremony it has usually been for nearly the last half century. You clearly don't like what I've just written for whatever reason, but nothing you’ve said in response changes the basic facts of the matter, as reflected by The Guardian, a major UK newspaper. 2A02:C7C:DA08:AB00:6B1A:93AA:7DCA:9B79 (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 26

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Liz Tomkins

[edit]
Article: Liz Tomkins (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [3], [4]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Happily888 (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Liverpool parade incident

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Liverpool parade incident (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Seventy-nine people are injured after a man drives into a crowd at a victory parade in Liverpool, England. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Significant incident which has been reported on internationally. harrz talk 17:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Well-cited, well-written article, and significant number of casualties despite (thankfully) no deaths. The Kip (contribs) 17:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If it bleeds, it leads. EEng 20:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a highly offensive comment. Please withdraw it. 2A02:C7C:DA04:1200:F642:9179:DA3A:29EA (talk) 21:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think EEng meant to be offensive, but was quoting a traditional journalism saying that is common in newsrooms and television studios. Happily, nobody was killed in what seems to be a very bad accident, and because it was an accident with no fatalities I'd oppose the good faith nomination. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just so. It surely should have been obvious that I didn't mean to be offensive, because had I wanted to be offensive I'd have made a much better job of it. EEng 23:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC) P.S., Randy: "If they're dead, it's widely read; if just hurt, it lies inert." Sorry, best I could do.[reply]
    I am well aware of the common usage of the phrase (although many readers doubtless would not be). I have already said to you that I was sure you meant no offence, but I had hoped that in hindsight you would recognize the incredible bad taste of your attempted joke and reflect on whether it had any place here. Perhaps if you tried to reword it in plain English? Although I seriously doubt anyone here is unaware of the fact that tragic events such as this are considered newsworthy regardless of whether anyone actually died. 2A02:C7C:DA04:1200:F642:9179:DA3A:29EA (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And as I have already said to you, my post was not any kind of "attempted joke", so at long last please put a sock in it. As for the rest, see [5]. EEng 04:35, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Medium support although no deaths, the amount of injuries is huge, nearly 100 to be exact. It also targeted soccer fans. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - If there weren’t an unfathomable number of casualties I would oppose, but the sheer number of injuries is enough to be notable. EF5 20:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I could support this for the dangerous precedent it set regarding the police releasing the ethnicity of suspects to quell misinformation and prevent further race riots. It is also rather obviously a highly unusual event in the UK context, one that raises serious questions about the police's ability to actually prevent a mass casualty vehicular terrorist attack when there is a sufficiently large target area and a sufficiently complex set of countermeasures. If such events are banned or dramatically scaled back as a result, that would be a very big deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7c:da04:1200:f642:9179:da3a:29ea (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think that the sheer number of injuries makes this notable enough to post. Don't combine it with the football blurb, though, if it does get posted. Ollieisanerd (talkcontribs) 11:23, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support combined blurb. ArionStar (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Rick Derringer

[edit]
Article: Rick Derringer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American musician. Article is in rough shape, with a lot of uncited statements + a COI orange tag. The Kip (contribs) 03:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Charles Rangel

[edit]
Article: Charles Rangel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article is GA – Muboshgu (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Liverpool win English Premier League title

[edit]
Article: 2024–25 Premier League (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In association football, Liverpool win the Premier League title. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In association football, Liverpool win the Premier League, a record-equalling 20th title.
Alternative blurb II: A vehicle collision occurred after Liverpool won the Premier League, a record-equalling 20th title.
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Joint record 20th title with Manchester United. I posted this as a candidate on 26th April after they won the title, however some argued that it should be posted at conclusion of the season. yorkshiresky (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. WP:ITNR states "events are generally posted as soon as a winner is determined"(emphasis mine), which isn't a hard and fast rule that we can't wait until the end of season to post the winner. –DMartin 08:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support altblurb2 though not notable on its own, since EPL is ITNR, it's a good addition to the blurb.Sportsnut24 (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support original blurb The orange tag has been addressed by Black Kite. I see no issue with posting about it now, as Liverpool's victory continues to be in the news. However, I disagree with both of the alt blurbs - alt1 sounds a little too promotional, and alt2 groups in an event that I don't think meets the ITN notability criteria (nobody died, seems like a fluke incident as opposed to political/terrorism, etc). FlipandFlopped 19:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note Marked as ITNR. -- KTC (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Premier League not the English Premier League. -- KTC (talk) 07:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose alt2 as written - I have no opinion on inclusion of the incident, but it needs to be in the correct context, i.e. that it occured around / to the crowd at the trophy parade, rather than merely it happened after Liverpool won. -- KTC (talk) 07:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the original blurb - the season has just ended, so the story is still ripe (if becoming a little over-ripe). Oppose alt-2, as the ramming incident, while tragic and significant, was not so severe that we would post it independently, and it lacks a clear semantic connection to the football title. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The ramming incident has now been separately nominated at ITN above. Natg 19 (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing wrong with posting now, as the Premier League season has just ended. Technically Liverpool won on 4/27 but officially they won this past weekend, and that was also when their championship parade was. Natg 19 (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 25

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Harrison Ruffin Tyler

[edit]
Article: Harrison Ruffin Tyler (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [7]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Grandson of John Tyler and preservationist. Engineerchange (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Review needed) 2025 Surinamese general election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Surinamese general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the Surinamese general election, the National Democratic Party (leader Jennifer Geerlings-Simons pictured) wins the most seats in the National Assembly. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Suriname, the National Democratic Party (leader Jennifer Geerlings-Simons pictured) wins the most seats in the National Assembly.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: The target article is a little bit stubby. 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗷𝗮𝘆𝗮𝟲𝟳 (talk). 02:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose The article is still too short... _-_Alsor (talk) 11:00, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tentative support. I think the article has enough bones to post, and at 2200 bytes is quite a bit beyond our usual stub level, plus there is a results prose section. I'm not sure what the time frame is for the president to he elected, but it does seem like that might be Jennifer, as things stand. Probably not final yet tho.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Phil Robertson

[edit]
Article: Phil Robertson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hill
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Reality TV star (Duck Dynasty) and conservative religious figure. Article is not in dreadful shape, but needs a few cites. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Indianapolis 500

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Indianapolis 500 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In motor racing, Álex Palou wins the Indianapolis 500. (Post)
News source(s): The Athletic – NYT
Credits:
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Article can use some work in expanding prose related to the race itself, but is otherwise solid. Casablanca 🪨(T) 00:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Peter David

[edit]
Article: Peter David (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AIPT
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Legendary comic book writerCurbon7 (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A couple of the awards are not sourced. Masem (t) 12:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Article seems fine Cambalachero (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is in good conditions. IDB.S (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ready to post. Jusdafax (talk) 09:27, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awards fixed. Should be good to go. Parabolist (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2024–25 Basketball Euro League Winner

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 EuroLeague Final Four (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In basketball, the 2024–25 EuroLeague concludes with Fenerbahçe winning the Final Four Playoff, and Nigel Hayes-Davis (pictured) awarded MVP. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In basketball, Fenerbahçe wins the EuroLeague Final Four, with Nigel Hayes-Davis (pictured) awarded MVP.
News source(s): https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/game-center/2024-25/as-monaco-fenerbahce-beko-istanbul/E2024/330/, https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/news/final-four-mvp-nigel-hayes-davis-fenerbahce-beko-istanbul/
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Zafer (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there needs to be a bolded article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is 2025 EuroLeague Final Four, I've fixed the blurb. Black Kite (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
... which hasn't even been updated, so Oppose. Black Kite (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note that 2024–25 Basketball Champions League is different from this one, I would highly suggest that the section title be changed. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, done. Black Kite (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Alan Yentob

[edit]
Article: Alan Yentob (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8], [9]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet ready There are a few CN tags. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: