User:Faizan/Toolbox
 |
|---|
| 14 May 2025 |
|
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 190.167.142.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- DawgWhoIsNotEmployed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2804:7f0:6a03:309f:a045:f65c:ffac:35ab (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:8003:326c:1c00:6c57:21f4:1c58:ab45 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 103.56.5.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2a00:801:757:a0c1:3c4a:9782:8e29:3d0c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Editor Praveen Prabhakar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Blatant self-promotion. User even attempted to promote themselves on their own talk page. CycloneYoris talk! 07:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 109.43.243.43 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Follow Me (Uncle Kracker song): Disruptive editing after final warning, using multiple IP addresses to add unsourced and unexplained material (see article history). Entranced98 (talk) 11:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- MGTWiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 11:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:268:985A:D360:99DC:3A52:A029:C47E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) continued nonsensical and unsourced edits across many articles after fourth warning Celjski Grad (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:268:985A:D360:99DC:3A52:A029:C47E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This user was automatically reported by Huggle due to reverted vandalism after a final warning. Please verify their contributions carefully, it may be a false positive. Magic Fizz (talk) 12:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 209.6.136.155 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Removing sourced information despite warnings. Seasider53 (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1017:B835:9338:61E9:1AFD:FC17:E0A3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – close AfD LTA. Annh07 (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2A00:801:757:A0C1:3C4A:9782:8E29:3D0C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block evasion of the range 217.21.224.0/20 (blocked in April for 8 years and a bit) and 209.206.25.171 (blocked in June for three months). Persistent adding of no longer active airlines to airport articles. Last block was for 2A02:AA1:115E:FE35:3D1F:C378:1754:2669, for 1 day, on the 19th of this month.The Banner talk 12:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Amararshi official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not to mention this edit they made to Amar Arshi. — Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 11:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Spoopyworld (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Aaravbalakrishnanantiorgastic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MoixalaKillerFan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- I.am.just.telling.the.truth (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ayanslfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Oxfordoxfordshire (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- Comment: This seems to be a reference to Oxford, Oxfordshire (the cathedral city) rather than Oxford University. — Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 14:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Agmarshall24 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username has edited on Draft:Center for Effective Organizations and Edward E. Lawler, both affiliated with USC Marshall School of Business. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ended up going with a warning following a discussion on my talk page. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- ChampionHelmets (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use (championhelmets.com) ☆ Bri (talk) 19:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Bri where have they promoted that website? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Tera baap randi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Means "your father is a prostitute" in Hindi/Urdu. Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 06:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Footballredditstream (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (footballredditstream.com). Annh07 (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Sushidude21! (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated incorrect changes of the infobox image by different Indian dynamic IPs in recent months, claiming to be typo fixes, which started last July. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 05:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vazulvonal of Stockholm is a long-term block evader who almost entirely edits in Hungarian nationalities for scientists from various Swedish IP addresses. A large percentage of the edits to the page over the last six months have been made by this editor. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the recent edits are vandalism from ip accounts. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 05:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent COI editing by people involved with the political group David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:20, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Per WP:PINKLOCK, template protection is not correct here, since the page is not protected due to its transclusion count (the 1 transclusion is the talk page). Requesting upgrade to full protection which does not go against WP:PP. Warudo (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Election Day is on Tuesday. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- agree with Muboshgu, IP vandalism, editwarring between non-WP:EXTENDED users, and significant portions of overlap around contemporary american politics, israel-palestine conflict, etc. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Surprising amount of vandalism by unregistered and new users over the past 6 months, for what should be a low-maintenance page. (Not the edit today; that was just a misunderstanding, but it made me reflect on previous edits.) I'd like to request pending changes protection for a year. — W.andrea (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. per per WP:ARBPIA. Altogether, it promotes pro-Israel narratives and bias. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 23:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. per WP:ARBPIA. Altogether, it promotes pro-Israel narratives and bias. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 23:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist tagging as this still seems to be missing. Rambling Rambler (talk) 13:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:53, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR. Srich0731 (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: User Brody Wesner/JRezOhio (I suspect from their edits that they are the same user with multiple accounts) has been constantly replacing the original, high quality, unprocessed page image with an inferior, highly processed image, with half the resolution of the original image, in possible violation of the 3RR. I flagged it in talk and they just keep reverting. Twunchy (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Self-explanatory. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 05:21, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Full move protection: As a highly visible page, this article has no reason to be moved without discussion. Also, it was previously fully move-protected from 2007 until 2018, when it was somehow downgraded to extended confirmed move protection along with the edit protection after a four-day full protection (see the protection log). BriDash9000 (talk) 07:55, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: as in past months (see this request in December 2024), persistent vandalism about handball club transfers: someone with multiple IP constantly adds hypothetical (or not confirmed yet) transfers (see ? on each item here for instance). Maybe those transfers will be confirmed in future, but Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a Crystal ball. By the way he never give any source, even for official transfers.
And sometimes the reverts go along with insults, as in this previous request or his 3 last reverts on Veszprém KC: "i see your back old friend, the scorpion to my spider man, the joker to my batman", "yo jack a** 99% of your crystal ball bull s*** came true, go back to your rat hole", "F YOU". Of course, as in the past, this club is not the only one targeted (see here for instance in May or most of my contribs. PS : I'm French so my contribs are mainly in wiki.fr and I'm a small contributor here), but Veszprém KC is actually the worst and the only with insults. Thanks LeFnake (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Entranced98 (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing content from the lead repeatedly. Article is already pending changes protected (indefinitely). Vestrian24Bio 10:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Entranced98 (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default. Absolutiva (talk) 11:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced materials by various IP hopper. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 12:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced materials by various IP hopper. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 12:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request incresase to extended confirmed for at least 90 days, following repeated vandalism and onging discussion on tp by surprising number of confirmed accounts pushing to have ICE labbelled as "gestapo". Thanks - \\'cԼF 13:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: Protection no longer needed after 16 years, which was semi-protected back in 2009. Absolutiva (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin @Future Perfect at Sunrise. Entranced98 (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Noting that the article falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Balkans or Eastern Europe.-- Ponyobons mots 16:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Is there any reason why the average editor would need to edit this? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I want to edit this please. Please change the protection settings to pending changes protection. 1.120.217.65 (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment:The talk page is not protected. You can make an edit request. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:59, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Thomas the Tank Engine is not protected. Favonian (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
There are reports of the new regime in Syria allowing Israeli jets to use its airspace, so Syria could now be listed as 'support' or 'proxy' on Israel's behalf. Israeli leaders have made no secret that they played a role in the dismantlement of the Assad regime through the weakening of Hezbollah, and deterring Iranian planes.
Additionally, there are allegations of unofficial support from Iraqi Kurdish groups and relations with Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as back-channel support from Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco.
Germany supports Israel and Merz has made that clear. Italy also supports. Probably limited Canadian and Australian support too. While, the Netherlands and Denmark also participated in "Operation Prosperity Guardian" in the Red Sea against the Houthis in Yemen.
On the other hand, Iran is supported by Iraq, Qatar, Turkey, Russia, North Korea, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It is not 'just' Israel and its Western allies and anti-regime Iranian proxies against the Iranian regime and its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen, but politically it is much more nuanced and many other countries are definitely involved here behind-the-scenes. 188.214.15.197 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Edit requests to that article should follow the WP:EDITXY guidelines because it is covered by 'contentious topics' rules. If the proposed changes do not follow those guidelines there is almost no chance that they will be implemented. And any claim should be accompanied by reliable sourcing that supports the claim. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Including this : " the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found Iran non-compliant with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years." has no bearing in the conflict per-se and is misleading the reader, as it just reads as a excuse for Israel assassinations
Moreso when :
There's no mention of the IAEA and CIA confirming Iran's claims of NOT working towards a Nuclear Weapon, while the US President publicly dismissed both reports ( Wich gives them credibility beyond doubt ) . These reports long predates the first Israel attack in the current War.
These news are all over internet by now. Shouldnt be hard to find sources, but i can do it easily.
I believe it should be noted in the opening of the article, as it is Israel's Claim/Excuse to attack Iran and it is being refuted by every involved party.
Removing/swaping the extract i quoted with the original reports will reflect the real ( reported ) status of the issue, and not just a narrative pushed by one side. 181.116.43.82 (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
I suggest removing the Npov, non-neutral edit: "Legal scholars saw the Israeli strikes as a violation of international law".
The reason for this is in the source itself, which claims a legal dispute. Therefore, presenting a specific legal side contradicts the principle of neutrality. I will note that a search of the Internet reveals two or three specific individuals with this opinion. I will note that the source talks about a publication on CNN as a fact. I will add that Israeli intelligence thought differently from the American one and accordingly there is a legal difference. I will note that from my memory such an assessment was not mentioned until after the bombing, the lengths were shorter. For example, this report in Hebrew, citing the New Times: https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-world/2025_q1/Article-0f2f019ebfdc491026.htm I will also mention this article that defines an attack on a nuclear reactor as an example of a justified preemptive attack: Shue, Henry and Rhodin, David (2007). Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press. p. 215.
Thank you in advance for your help and contribution to the free encyclopedia. 2A0D:6FC7:625:CDDE:594:A0C2:4FB1:9C04 (talk) 10:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
There is a chance that the incident is relevant to the article. North Korea is an ally of Iran. It has launched a nuclear program and American intelligence has had to deal with it. There have been talks with it.
I will add information from the article [1]: "The main dilemma in the field of nuclear arms control in the world today is related to the challenge of outlining policy effective, aimed at preventing the acquisition of nuclear weapons by new states determined to develop a military nuclear capability. These are states that launched covert military nuclear programs while they were members of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) — Iraq, Iran, and North Korea, but also Libya and Syria. These are states that explicitly denied that they were working to acquire a military nuclear capability but at the same time they exploited the weakness of the treaty's provisions and promoted military programs. This activity constituted a violation of the express commitment to remain non-nuclear, while pretending to uphold that very commitment. This unique situation made it very difficult for the powerful international actors tasked with upholding the treaty to effectively confront the nuclear ambitions of these states." For example, in the case of Iran, enrichment was at a level of 60%, enrichment that has no civilian uses, [2], [3] and the AMAD Project that provided the Iranians with knowledge [4] and was discontinued. In the Korean case, the military aspects are quite clear. Enrichment was carried out, plutonium and finally ballistic missiles (Iran already has them) [https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5067651,00.html]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0d:6fc0:99b:3900:9990:d2e8:cbb5:ce37 (talk) 13:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
NCRI Report: Iran’s Covert Nuclear Warhead Program and Missile Sites Exposed https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/nuclear/ncri-report-irans-covert-nuclear-warhead-program-and-missile-sites-exposed/
“Twenty years ago, Iran knew how to build a bomb,” Inbar said. “They built all the components, except for the nuclear core itself — at least that’s what’s known.” “Many of Iran’s facilities haven’t been examined by the International Atomic Energy Agency. If you’re only invited to see part of the program and can’t access key military sites, you don’t know what’s happening.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/could-irans-missiles-carry-nuclear-warheads-an-expert-breaks-down-the-threat/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0d:6fc0:99b:3900:9990:d2e8:cbb5:ce37 (talk) 13:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 149.22.219.132 (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
I have 2 edit requests, but am posting them here as I can't use the talk page
1. According to the BBC, the Iranian government has released updated casualty figures claiming that 430 have been killed, I was wondering if these should be added to the casualties and losses section.
2. Also according to the BBC, the IDF claims to have killed Quds force commander Saeed Izadi, and head of Quds force unit 190 Behnam Shahryari. If true, shouldn't they be added to the list of Iranian commanders and notable casualties section?
Also can we please make the talk page more accessible for editors, I understand why it's protected, but it's preventing lots of editors from making genuine edit requests and making adding factuality to the article much less efficient.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 17 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting permission to use the duplicate citations function and to assist with general typo and grammar edits. Folkezoft (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request AWB user rights to assist with link retargeting and related maintenance tasks on the English Wikipedia, specifically as it pertains to comics-related articles. My primary goal is to efficiently update links to comply with WP:NCC, ensuring that pages link to the current, correct article titles. While I have been using the Move+ tool, I find that it does not fully meet the scale and complexity of my ongoing work, especially when dealing with numerous backlinks and links with section anchors or piped text. AWB’s batch editing capabilities and advanced find-and-replace options are essential for streamlining these tasks and maintaining consistency across many pages. Additionally, I have experience using tools like the redirect helper for managing redirect categorization templates, which complements the link updating work I intend to perform using AWB. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and best practices when using AWB. Thank you for considering my request. Best regards, Red Shogun412 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
I am participating in the DAC 62th Wikipedia contest, where I edited the aticle Placement (electronic design automation) but I cannot move it to the main page. I kept the neutrality, formality, and used articles and books as references to write this article. Brunasunagai (talk) 08:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I frequently already have a habit of patrolling recent changes, and more recently, pending changes. I have a solid understanding of the basic guidelines that are necessary for articles to be established—I believe my own created articles can generally showcase this. While I do not regularly participate in XfDs, I do understand their purpose and when to utilize the processes (speedy, PROD, XfD) needed. Happy for any feedback or questions that may be necessary. Thanks in advance. haj • talk 16:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
I can help clean up a lot of junk and poorly formatted articles. Just happy to help if help is needed. JazzyOxygen (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have just completed the NPPS and passed the final exams.[5] I want to contribute actively in reviewing new pages on English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights - There are a lot of new politician pages that are being created, and I want to go through the backlog. Bpuddin (talk) 22:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
I am reapplying for NPP rights. I have been contributing regularly as an AFC reviewer and have done good number of reviews so far. Also contributing in JUNE Backlog Drive. My AFD stats are above 90% accurate. Have improved my understanding since last request. I am aware of and have been doing PROD, CSD and drafting , understanding of which are required for NPP rights . Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover[edit] |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be able to review edits that others have made, so I can check for vandalism. Floating Orb (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I was trying to revert a vandalism edit, but the disruptive editor had done multiple, making it harder for me to revert it. It would have been helpful to have rollback rights so I could undo it fully and quickly. Floating Orb (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |