User:Faizan/Toolbox
 |
|---|
| 14 May 2025 |
|
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Itsnicolewbr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Nicole Wallace (actress) was changed by Itsnicolewbr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864288 on 2025-06-19T07:31:30+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Peaceray (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Lackope 2.0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 121.55.229.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1362 (LTA 1362, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 188.214.15.197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: Wikipedia:Contentious topics applies to this edit. Peaceray (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 31.143.85.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 82.7.196.61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Doesn't appear to be vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 20:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2405:201:c410:3058:4127:1e64:8124:fefc (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2405:201:c410:3058:3cd4:5294:5039:b218 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- 117.231.200.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Technopatrick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. I know it is late, but the account seems to be impersonating the user Technopat, as seen here. Plasticwonder (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Therealdeancaetonsmanager (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SACOLLECTIVESTIVES (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 12:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- There is a tattoo shop in St Ives with this name.Secretlondon (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- LiamBayDeveloper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Usernamepolicy11092001 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Wikipesuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "suck" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- It looks short for "Wikipedia Sucks," which would no doubt be a very disruptive username and very likely be WP:NOTHERE. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Transgenghnal-absolution;a-fictional-process-and-a-truly-lovely-individual (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Brutalpolicy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Supercooltrollhaha123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hater in chief (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Shitwawa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Scorpionstudiosbiggestfan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Morosophic Turd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "turd" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- TJonesStaffer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ihatenicholas (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheOfficialBruhGamer1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Oxfordoxfordshire (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- Comment: This seems to be a reference to Oxford, Oxfordshire (the cathedral city) rather than Oxford University. — Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 14:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- AELOTBEATS (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 08:50, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- GODOTSOLUTIONS (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism – edit warring, and addition of misinformation. 122.150.118.203 (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unregistered user repeatedly making unnecessary and extreme changes without explanation or discussion on talk page. Tbf62 (talk) 23:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Which I note hasn't been used since 2020. Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing this as a primary topic under PIA as (my logic) it has no nexus to the current conflict and indeed the article's timeline stops at 2019. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: seeking temporary semi-protection because IP user repeated additions of undue content based on primary sources and blogs without looking for talk page consensus and uncivil edit summaries Czarking0 (talk) 02:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: Protect the Michel Luc Bellemare section and the Michel Luc Bellemare contributions. They are accurate, since, they have been reformulated. Avantgarde1111 (talk) 12:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The relevant user has been informed about the potential consequences of WP:LOUTSOCK. Let's keep it at that for the time being. Favonian (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recent disruptive changes to this company's name, logo, etc., from several repeat offenders against consensus, all while a pending contentious RM is underway. The article has been subject to and the target of promotional changes from these SPAs, showing no sign of ceasing anytime soon. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 05:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see any of this since it was protected last month. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hanover Research. Binksternet (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:152:203:4170::/64 (talk · contribs). Three months. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page itself was created by a sockpuppet named User:ShovelandSpade, and right now its being edited (disruptive) again by IP accounts likely related to the same editor. Page deletion might also be discussed.Woxic1589 (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Youre removal of cited content that has been reviewed by other users is not anyone elses problem, its yours. 2A00:1358:E237:EC00:389A:8F50:A951:BBC0 (talk) 15:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2a00:1358:e237:ec00::/64 (talk · contribs). Three months. Favonian (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as last time. IPs continuing to add new logo that is NOT on the company website nor does it meet a style guideline that they claim it does. They also refuse to engage in discussion. CNMall41 (talk) 16:20, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I'll also note that the style guide says it is grey when it must be on a white background (p 15), so you should go back to the talk page to discuss more. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:07, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Automated comment: @Daniel Case: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- I unprotected it in deference to Rsjaffe's decision not to protect before I had completed the protection, a decision I was unaware of due to the race condition that plagues this reply system. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Very contentious article documenting a caste; many people have edited the article in order to push their own narrative, which often diverges from reality. I'd like to request that only extended-confirmed can edit.
In addition, I'd like to request the barring of Devid yadav from editing the article due to repeated reversions of any source conflicting his narrative.
Thanks, Plastixfy (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. If you want a user banned, that is beyond the scope of this noticeboard. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated unsourced changes due an imminent transfer. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP and new editors, looks like a joke. Tacyarg (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to WP:ARBPIA and the recent war with Iran and the Zionist state. I don't see why this is under semi. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 19:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated removal by IP editor of content (present according the WP:UKCITIES) 10mmsocket (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: History on this team 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Multiple moves. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it was deleted back in 2018. Since 2018, Arishfa Khan has been featured in several mainstream Indian entertainment and lifestyle publications such as Times of India, Hindustan Times, India Today, and News18, covering her acting career, music video appearances, and social media influence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behappyyar (talk • contribs) 04:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have a draft on her, or are you just spouting off a bunch of outlet names as if they're supposed to mean something? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Jéské Couriano Yes, absolutely — I have prepared a draft article for Arishfa Khan. I'm not merely naming media outlets at random; I’ve collected and reviewed multiple reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage of her work as a television actress, music video performer, and social media influencer.
- Here are some of the references I've considered while building the draft:
- I believe this clearly demonstrates that the subject now meets the General Notability Guideline since the last deletion and warrants article recreation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behappyyar (talk • contribs) 13:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- First, you need to start signing your posts with ~~~~. Second, refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
- https://www.siasat.com/meet-arishfa-khan-popular-girl-approached-for-bigg-boss-19-3229520/amp/ doesn't help with eligibility (routine coverage). Since a lot of reality-show-related coverage tends to be gossip or scandal-rag-level coverage, we discount any news related to those for the most part.
- We can't use https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/entertainment/arishfa-khan-turns-entrepreneur-349059 (unknown provenance). Role byline; who wrote this?
- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/veera-fame-sayyed-arishfa-khan-reveals-her-mothers-numerous-sacrifices-to-make-her-a-heroine/amp_articleshow/78556087.cms doesn't help for eligibility (connexion to subject). Almost the entire article is an extended quote from her. Times of India is generally a dodgy source for biographical details anyway.
- https://www.indiaforums.com/article/zain-imam-to-join-arishfa-khan-in-yaara-2_155598 doesn't help for eligibility (wrong subject, routine coverage). Run-of-the-mill Indian film hype piece that has a lot of words but says nothing worthwhile, and Khan's hardly discussed.
- We can't use The Irish Sun (deprecated).
- We can't use https://www.cityairnews.com/content/tv-actor-arishfa-khan-and-adnaan-shaikh-launch-their-diamond-ring-song (unknown provenance, too sparse). Role byline, and the source doesn't really discuss her.
- None of your sources are any good. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- All of these sources are rubbish, just like Draft:Dananeer Mobeen, another G5 re-creation. I would address and wait for this SPI closure prior to making any more requests or draft creations. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- First, you need to start signing your posts with ~~~~. Second, refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
- I believe this clearly demonstrates that the subject now meets the General Notability Guideline since the last deletion and warrants article recreation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behappyyar (talk • contribs) 13:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Create Draft:Arishfa Khan and submit it through WP:AFC when you deem it ready for publication. Having recently created Draft:Dananeer Mobeen, you appear to be familiar with the process. Favonian (talk) 15:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
There are reports of the new regime in Syria allowing Israeli jets to use its airspace, so Syria could now be listed as 'support' or 'proxy' on Israel's behalf. Israeli leaders have made no secret that they played a role in the dismantlement of the Assad regime through the weakening of Hezbollah, and deterring Iranian planes.
Additionally, there are allegations of unofficial support from Iraqi Kurdish groups and relations with Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as back-channel support from Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco.
Germany supports Israel and Merz has made that clear. Italy also supports. Probably limited Canadian and Australian support too. While, the Netherlands and Denmark also participated in "Operation Prosperity Guardian" in the Red Sea against the Houthis in Yemen.
On the other hand, Iran is supported by Iraq, Qatar, Turkey, Russia, North Korea, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It is not 'just' Israel and its Western allies and anti-regime Iranian proxies against the Iranian regime and its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen, but politically it is much more nuanced and many other countries are definitely involved here behind-the-scenes. 188.214.15.197 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Edit requests to that article should follow the WP:EDITXY guidelines because it is covered by 'contentious topics' rules. If the proposed changes do not follow those guidelines there is almost no chance that they will be implemented. And any claim should be accompanied by reliable sourcing that supports the claim. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
In the sentence: "The IDF hit a building where several senior officials of Iran's intelligence organizations were staying, was targeted, killing Iran's intelligence chief and other key senior officials." remove:"was targeted," because the sentence doesn't work as is. This seems like the result of an edit that rephrased the sentence but didn't properly remove part of the old one. Parcynthia (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 20 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like AutoWikiBrowser rights to edit using JavaScript Wiki Browser. I'm planning on fixing some typos in Category:All Wikipedia articles needing copy edit. I originally intended only to find MOS:CURLY violations which I've been doing by hand for a while now, and this would speed up the process. While I'm at it though, I might as well help fix other typos with JWB. --cheesewhisk3rs (pester) 10:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC) --cheesewhisk3rs (pester) 10:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Requesting permission to use the duplicate citations function and to assist with general typo and grammar edits. Folkezoft (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request AWB user rights to assist with link retargeting and related maintenance tasks on the English Wikipedia, specifically as it pertains to comics-related articles. My primary goal is to efficiently update links to comply with WP:NCC, ensuring that pages link to the current, correct article titles. While I have been using the Move+ tool, I find that it does not fully meet the scale and complexity of my ongoing work, especially when dealing with numerous backlinks and links with section anchors or piped text. AWB’s batch editing capabilities and advanced find-and-replace options are essential for streamlining these tasks and maintaining consistency across many pages. Additionally, I have experience using tools like the redirect helper for managing redirect categorization templates, which complements the link updating work I intend to perform using AWB. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and best practices when using AWB. Thank you for considering my request. Best regards, Red Shogun412 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have on my main accout Anti-pro-air (talk) 00:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
Hi! I'd like to request event co-ordinator rights permanently please as I'm constantly running Wikipedia training sessions throughout the year, and this is only going to increase over time. Let me know if you need any more information! Octavosaurus (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit]
I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
My NPR rights expire at the end of this month and I would like to extend it or make permanent. Thanks! Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 00:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
I frequently already have a habit of patrolling recent changes, and more recently, pending changes. I have a solid understanding of the basic guidelines that are necessary for articles to be established—I believe my own created articles can generally showcase this. While I do not regularly participate in XfDs, I do understand their purpose and when to utilize the processes (speedy, PROD, XfD) needed. Happy for any feedback or questions that may be necessary. Thanks in advance. haj • talk 16:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
I can help clean up a lot of junk and poorly formatted articles. Just happy to help if help is needed. JazzyOxygen (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have just completed the NPPS and passed the final exams.[1] I want to contribute actively in reviewing new pages on English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights - There are a lot of new politician pages that are being created, and I want to go through the backlog. Bpuddin (talk) 22:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I'm just personally sick of not being able to move pages occupied by a redirect. I have initiated and participated in several move discussions, and would be willing to perform moves for others aswell. ―Howard • 🌽33 21:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I'm re-requesting rollback to use tools that require this permission to more effectively combat vandalism. I believe I should have a high enough edit count. GalStar (talk) 03:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I was graciously referred here by Myrealnamm. My primary focus on Wikipedia is anti-vandalism work, so rollback would naturally be useful for me. I have read WP:ROLLBACK and feel like I have a good grasp on detecting good/bad faith edits. (I'd certainly hope so, if I got this far.) Thanks for your consideration. ⫷doozy (talk▮contribs)⫸ 05:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Rollback appears useful for various reverts in specific instances when a serious vandal has made a rapid-fire succession of edits which need to be reverted. I enjoy using RedWarn, but rollback itself is handy here also for the AntiVandal tool I see. I have made around 70,000 edits and feel I qualify as a good candidate for this permission. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Requesting rollback rights to help me fight vandalism and use tools such as AntiVandal. --pro-anti-air (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
I have made almost 6,000 edits to Wikipedia and have been reverting vandalism for a few years using Twinkle and UltraViolet. I am familiar with the guidelines and processes of reverting and rollbackers would be helpful. SKAG123 (talk) 01:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I have over 500 mainspace edits without vanishing the articles. I am not the vanished user. I will not be blocked if I’m not vanishing the pages. In late 2023, I did revert a few articles that were vanished by the IPs. So, I will grant my Rollback right soon. Thomasfan1916 (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to support my anti-vandalism work. I have been actively patrolling recent changes and reviewing edits for potential vandalism, often using filters and tools like ORES. I’ve been reverting obvious vandalism manually and warning users where appropriate. I’m interested in increasing my efficiency with tools like Huggle and STiki, which require rollback rights. I understand the responsibilities of the rollback tool and will use it only for clear-cut vandalism or disruptive edits, not content disputes. Thank you for considering my request. Dahawk04 (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I will request my rollbacker rights, so I can use AntiVandal tool. I've most frequently used Twinkle on my Gadgets since I'm autoconfirmed. After they reverted my edits for not following WP:MOS guideline, as well as vandalism. Absolutiva (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I have experience in reverting vandalism with Twinkle and would like to access the Huggle tool to continue this work. Thank you. Magic Fizz (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
I was trying to revert a vandalism edit, but the disruptive editor had done multiple, making it harder for me to revert it. It would have been helpful to have rollback rights so I could undo it fully and quickly. Floating Orb (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to more efficiently combat vandalism using advanced tools such as Huggle or AntiVandal. I'd like to believe that I always AGF when patrolling RC and I always leave an appropriate notice on users' talk page when reverting. Thank you for your time. Nubzor (T | C) 21:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |