Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 2a02:1812:2c0e:6d00:bdfd:bd47:73be:56fa (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Warned. PhilKnight (talk) 02:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Jenniemartyn1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Tyranogenic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- 103.57.84.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2404:4400:6708:ed00:f154:f087:481c:fbe1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- RockDoc.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Coolie Driver 5204 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "coolie" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- GoldenAppleOfficial27 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Elolololo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- FND Group (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Lukecafc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Prettiestkittiestittiest (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "titties" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ieditshitman (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Flakobinladen (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bin ?lad[ei]n" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Caillou'sUltimatePunishmentDay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stinkyfootburr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- CurrentlyBeingLockedOut1920 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Misleading, promotional, offensive, and disruptive (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Tosin Salako (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Has declared that they are not Tosin Salako but are representing him professionally. They must change their user name. The only way to ensure this is a warning shot. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 21:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- The account is representing an artist by that name. We allow real names, but in this case it's their employer's/client's real name rather than their own. What do others think? Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well, WP:REALNAME states
Do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name.
Think that's pretty clear. For example, what if Salako splits from this person. Who controls the account? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)- On top of that, WP:REALNAME states: "If a username implies that the user is, or is related to, a notable, identifiable or well-known person, the account may be blocked as a precaution against impersonation until the user's proof of identity is provided." Anyone can claim to be a representative of a well-known person, so such a claim would also require proof to satisfy this portion of the policy. I'm holding off from immediately blocking due to the discussion initiated at User talk:Tosin Salako § Immediate action required, but the account should be blocked if its username is not changed to a policy-compliant one in a reasonable amount of time. — Newslinger talk 21:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well, WP:REALNAME states
- The account is representing an artist by that name. We allow real names, but in this case it's their employer's/client's real name rather than their own. What do others think? Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Shree Kapur Lyrics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username that implies shared use. Tarlby (t) (c) 16:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Gnostic Futurism (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Engaged in promotion only. See Draft:Gnostic Futurism. Agent 007 (talk) 08:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Xecrets (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Engaged in promotion only. See Special:AbuseLog/41003918. Agent 007 (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi‑protection (1 month) – persistent IP vandalism since the high‑profile events of 27 May 2025 (pardon) and 4 Jun 2025 (TV‑series announcement). — Dahawk04 (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Examples
- Unsourced claim about pardon terms
- Defamatory statement repeatedly re‑added after reversion
- Blanking of the cited sentencing section
- Per WP:SEMI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dahawk04 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Skitash (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Skitash (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Infinite extended confirmed protection Arbitration enforcement, it about the Arab-Israeli conflict. ArtopiaBoy (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 02:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon troll is disrupting User talk:Toa Nidhiki05 and having a revert war with themselves. Viriditas (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 04:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. Long semiprotection needed. Island92 (talk) 04:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs vandalizing shortly after ECP was lifted. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 06:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 00:41, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Last disruption was on 4 June; report 2601:245:4702:CFC0:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) if they do so again (added to watchlist). Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The edit warring here continues. Perhaps implement a higher level of restriction for a month as her album is released today. Karst (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi or ECP protection: Editor (and some likely MEAT or SOCK accounts) repeatedly adding WP:BLP questionable and WP:OR content already reverted several times in the past couple of weeks despite being advised why doing so is problematic and being encouraged to use the talk page to discuss in edit summaries and at User talk:InklingF#Hulleys of Baslow page. Editor in question is quickly approaching 3RR so perhaps some short-term WP:SEMI or WP:ECP will encourage them to use the article's talk page and help them avoid a block for edit warring. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and potential for edit warring due to the politically sensitive nature of the topic. The page has seen repeated attempts to add unsourced or biased content. Requesting semi-protection to prevent further vandalism or biased editing from unregistered users. 78.101.242.98 (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The article has experienced persistent disruptive editing due to the politically sensitive nature of Akre District, which is disputed between the Iraqi Federal Government and the Kurdistan Regional Government. There have been repeated attempts to add unsourced or biased content, leading to edit warring and potential violations of Wikipedia’s neutrality policy. Semi-protection is requested to prevent further vandalism and ensure the article’s integrity. 78.101.242.98 (talk) 11:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism of the page related to indigenous culture and content. Repeated disruptive editing, especially from anonymous users. Requesting semi-protection or extended confirmed protection to maintain page integrity. Titi7000 (talk) 12:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC) [1]. [2]
References
- ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akwete_cloth
- ^ Chudi-Duru, Chika (2021). "Shifting the Boundaries of Akwete-Igbo Traditional Weaving: An Imperative for Development of Igbo Traditional Weaving". Graspact Journal of Art and Technology. 1 (4): 11–22. Retrieved 2025-06-06.
Automated comment: @Titi7000: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 6 June 2025 (UTC)- I fixed the link at the top of the section, but no comment on the request. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi protection. Lot of IP edits on content dispute especially with bio. Only requesting a brief protection due to the NYC primary approaching and more media coverage. Malibukenz (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 16:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism to this BLP since 10:11, 22 May 2025. Alith Anar 16:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism to this BLP since 18:22, 5 June 2025. Alith Anar 16:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism still, current political events Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content (and violation of MOS:TV/WP:TVGUIDE over long term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dahawk04 (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User using multiple IP addresses to add non-sourced non-English (Portuguese) content. — Tony talk 01:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2804:389:4000:0:0:0:0:0/34 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per ARBPIA5, PIA articles ECR by default. Longhornsg (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Like fellow redirect That's Entertainment (Hazbin Hotel), keeps being recreated by sock- and meatpuppeteer. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 03:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR: Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area
. Many edits are in violation of this policy, so it appears that protection is necessary. Yours truly, Stuffinwriting | talk | sign | contributions 04:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Israel and Palestine, protests. Valorrr (lets chat) 04:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 05:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: In October 2017, this page about a beloved British TV presenter was made "EXTENDED CONFIRMED PROTECTION" due to aggressive sock puppetry. I would like to see this page down to semi-protection due to little vandalism over almost eight years. Frankster04 (talk) 21:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- That's circular reasoning. The fact that there is little vandalism simply means the protection is working as it should. Also, did you follow the instructions at the top of this page and ask the protecting administrator? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- The only way to know if protection is still needed is to see if disruption returns without the protection, so time having passed is a valid reason. The protecting administrator is Favonian. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article about the UK boxer has been extended confirmed protection since a May 2018 spell of block evasion-induced vandalism. I’d like to see this page downgraded to semi-protection due to both little vandalism and his high profile (many high profile celebs' articles are semi-protected). Frankster04 (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please read the instructions at the top. You're supposed to ask the protecting administrator first, but I'll do it here. @Orangemike: what say you? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- For what it is worth, I think this is probably a good candidate to reduce to SP. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Of the edits prior to protection, I only see one reverted edit by an auto-confirmed user, so I don't think that extended-confirmed protection was necessary in the first place. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Done, now indef semi-protected. Any changes to duration would be a different discussion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: 15 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption and protecting admin is retired. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Unprotected. Bambifan101 seems inactive. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 56 transclusions. Not enough for template protection. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:B760:276F:5BA6:1929 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: No need for move protection. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: 10 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: 16 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption. Thepharoah17 (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: 15 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption. Thepharoah17 (talk) 06:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Migfab008 (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:50, 7 June 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have created 96 articles so far, out of which only 2 have been deleted. Most of my articles are well-sourced biographies, mainly related to the Pakistan Army, with some focused on media personalities. I strive to follow Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines in all my contributions. Granting me autopatrolled status will help reduce the workload for new page reviewers. You may also consider taking suggestions from the reviewers (JTtheOG, John B123) who frequently review my pages, as they are familiar with the quality and consistency of my work. Behappyyar (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
As a reviewer at NPP I frequently accept book articles by this user. They've created 62 mainspace articles with 0 deletions. Their articles are easy accepts (clearly indicate how the book passes WP:NBOOK and do not need any error-fixing); may as well take them out of the backlog. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm doing a lot of repetitive edits on articles, fixing typos, improving grammar and adding consistent info across pages, so I need AutoWikiBrowser to make the process smoother. I especially need it for pages related to railway stations and Chak villages, where I've been working on adding almost same information. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I’ve created quite a handful of pages on the Nigerian portal, but I often find it difficult to finish everything. I have to drop a shout everytime on GoingBatty’s talk page (didn’t want to ping him) to help tidy things up. I mostly focus on creating pages, and doing all the edits manually doesn’t help. Please consider me for the AutoWikiBrowser permission. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 23:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I have previously been approved as User:Theknine2, but I have since changed my username to User:TenthAvenueFreezeOut, so I need my old username (Theknine2) to be replaced with my current username inside the list. Thank you! TenthAvenueFreezeOut (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I tried WPCleaner and I like the concept, but WPCleaner had some jank and seems less customizable and polished than AWB. I was hoping to clean up typos along with syntax/formatting, and a tool like AWB seems much easier on the eyes for finding problems like that. If it isn't what I am looking for, I'll request permission removal if that is preferable. 【💬】 22:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
For this time, I am requesting autoconfirmed user rights to substantially contribute to English Wikipedia by creating redirects, particularly for multilingual content as outlined in WP:NOENG. My curative goal is to efficiently create accurate redirects to enhance the project’s accessibility. Granting me these rights will allow me to begin contributing on this version of Wikipedia with proper standardisation. Thank you for considering my request. Batchno-Nul (talk) 03:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights My account has been up for 4 days, made over 10 edits, and did not get autoconfirmed, something wrong? SovietAddict68 (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
My main account has this permissions (User:ExplorerofSpace), and I would like to have it on this one as well. ExplorerofUniverse (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
This is the alt account of R1F4T and I have this right on my main means on the R1F4T account so to contribute from local networks and public devices like school or colleges device and others device I am asking for this right খাত্তাব (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
hey so I was on a talk page requesting an edit to a page be done, no one replied so I got bored. I was playing around with my sandbox because I was bored. I made tons of edits goofing around. because I played around with my sandbox I was almost at 515 edits. I saw that and was surprised. I decided to edit pages that require extended confirmed access. And then I edited the page where I left a comment on the talk page because no one was replying. Immediately my extended confirmed rights were revoked. Someone said I was gaming the system to get extended confirmed rights, when that's simply not true. I was just goofing around with my talk page, that's all. Gaming the system wasn't my intention. If it was I would've stopped why did I stop at 511 edits or so, that doesn't make sense. And if I was gaming the system to edit extended access I don't vandalize pages or nothing. I make normal edits to improve pages, so can I have extended confirmed back please GloryToCalifornia (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
I’d like to request file mover rights to help fix unclear or poorly named files in line with naming guidelines. I'm familiar with tagging files for renaming and understand the relevant policies. Being able to handle simple, non-controversial moves myself would speed up the process. I’ll use the tool responsibly and continue contributing to file maintenance. Thanks. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 16:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year now. I'm interested in becoming a New Page Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of new content on Wikipedia. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my New Page Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed there's a pretty large backlog, so I decided to volunteer. I've taken a break from my usual editing the past few days to get familiar with the NPR process. I’ve written articles on all sorts of topics, especially biographies, geography. I'm not comparatively active in AfD, but my understanding of various notability guidelines could be useful when reviewing articles. Thank you! Pasados (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Renewing rights from a 30 day trial granted by @User:Rosguill. Veko (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for New Page Reviewer right. I have been a Wikipedia editor for 8 years, created several articles and have also been a reader in AFD discussions. Through this, I have gained understanding of the requirements for a new page creation. I have also contributed to delete discussions and I have been known to show respect for others in such discussions. Would appreciate the opportunity to contribute further. Thanks in advance. Ataavi (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will like to request new page reviewer rights because I want to assist in the reduction of large backlog at AfC, I edit some new articles at New Page Feeds, I participate in AFD, and have knowledge of deletion process. I have a good knowledge of content policies and guidelines. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 17:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
My NPR rights expire at the end of this month and I would like to extend it or make permanent. Thanks! Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 00:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request 1 month NPR to participate in the backlog drive, I'm currently an AfC reviewer and have good knowledge of guidelines for CSD, draftifying, etc. Destinyokhiria (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
My temporary NPR permission expired yesterday. I would like to extend it or make permanent. Thanks in advance. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights. I've created a number of math and My Little Pony articles, and I think I have a good grasp of what a new page should have. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I first encountered a situation where the page mover permission would have been helpful when moving Michael Savage (politician) to Mike Savage (politician). Now as I continue developing content I ran into a situation where I need to move a ready article (Draft:Pottersfield Press) over a redirect I previously created (Pottersfield Press), and I foresee situations like this happening more, so now seems like a good time to figure out technical moves rather than continuing to ask others to do it. I intend to only use the page mover abilities for this purpose for the foreseeable future, and may start fulfilling uncontroversial move requests once I become sufficiently familiar with the process. Thanks. MediaKyle (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Believe it would useful when making technical page redirects as I often do, such as moving James C. Ho to James Ho and moving The Proxmire Amendment to Proxmire Amendments. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request page mover rights so there are no redirects left when redirecting articles in restricted topics, made by non extended confirmed users. Vanezi (talk) 07:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC) Vanezi (talk) 07:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed recent changes patroller who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights. By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there! Despite my account having existed since 2009, I only have a modest edit count - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges. I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding. If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself. Thank you very much for your time & consideration. ···sardonism · t · c 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I think I'm supposed to have this as I see an option suddenly for pending changes on my watchlist, for the article Remote sensing? I was going to approve (it's just a newer user adding some book references), but I guess I cannot? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
A little bit ago I made a request (which was declined - account new), I am again requesting this right because: -My account is now over a month old -My account is extended confirmed -Lately, I have run across a lot of fine pending changes edits, but I can not approve them only revert them As you can see, the main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism, you noted I should be a little more careful in doing so, which is what I did. I think this right would allow me to reduce backlog, and do something I like (reverting vandalism) in a different way. As you can see, I am also requesting the rollback right, which would help me with this process as while as reverting vandalism in general. Whatever the outcome is, thank you. If it is not done, please provide me with steps I can take to get approved. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I do a lot of Recent Changes patrol for anti-vandalism purposes, and I'd like to be able to approve the good edits to protected pages I come across (instead of just reverting things...) Thanks for your consideration. penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I am back again. A little bit ago, I requested this right, and it was denied because it was not old enough.[1] My account is now one month old and I have extended confirmed permissions.[2] I was wondering if that is enough to get me this permission, thanks. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |