User:Darkwind/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 211.36.133.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- 46.112.2.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 50 five times in the last 5 minutes (Shouting, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- LillKingdom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 189 five times in the last 5 minutes (BLP vandalism or libel, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:184:c501:f240:5938:b3b9:d10b:d459 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Alazar.biru.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On List of 2025 albums (diff): vandalism after final warning. Previous made edits as User:71.78.3.70 for which they were warned for disruption. They made the same edits again, for which they were reported (this was ignored, unclear why). They have since made this account and continued to make the same edits with it (most of the edits they've made have been on List of 2025 albums, and most have those have been reverted), which have been repeatedly reverted over months with multiple warnings in edit summaries and on their talk page. User has been given too many chances to stop making these disruptive edits, and the warnings have consistently gone ignored. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:803:482:85F0:ED4:AAE8:8EA6:B6EE (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. Resumed on /64 range off 6 month block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Fukualofa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – possible sockpuppet, vandalism-only account 103.56.5.158 (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- 197.185.187.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning - After final warning and a warning from an admin, this IP is still making non-constructive edits and refuses to acknowledge its mistakes. They italize a song title instead of using quotation marks, they insist on name dropping other artists in the lead of another artist's article, they remove vital sources and referenced content. Clearly they are inexperienced, but they refuse to start small. dxneo (talk) 10:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Caillou'sUltimatePunishmentDay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- This username does violate the username policy, but not for the reason stated by the bot. It is a disruptive username as it implies child abuse. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:32, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ubertrollz123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ismsschool2041 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dirtylou$92 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Therealdeancaetonsmanager (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Aidanlolol (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- SACOLLECTIVESTIVES (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 12:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- There is a tattoo shop in St Ives with this name.Secretlondon (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- YoloBetter (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "yolo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Although this string is not a username violation in and of itself, it may indicate disruptive editing. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- MBTI (energy+openness+empathy+discipline) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Whydoyoureadusernames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Litdudettv (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: lltdudettv" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- MethyltheobromineConnoisseur (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- I knoweverythingsodontquestionme (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sanyorin corporation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- FoundationNurse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WiipediaUsername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Casiopedia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Impersonation of Cassiopeia. Migfab008 (talk) 04:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- There are lots of things called cassiopeia, including the constellation. This doesn't have to be impersonation. Secretlondon (talk) 11:37, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Engr. Munzali Kawo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. -- Least Action (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
-
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. The editor appears to be trying to add their resume. That's a db-u5 candidate (and I've deleted it as such), but it's not a WP:UPOL violation. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wa$hingtonFTFan26 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. -- Least Action (talk) 02:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- TiTiTi1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Starfall2015 chat | about me 08:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- HealthAk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (healthak.com). —Bruce1eetalk 11:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 03:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Please discuss the issue with the editor, and explain "disruption". Materialscientist (talk) 04:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent editwarring over who is the real Steau Bucarest. The Banner talk 07:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 10:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It's a highly notable page. Vinizex94🌍 08:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Highly notable, though rarely vandalized. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to WP:ARBPIA, page history shows a revert citing these restrictions. Entranced98 (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection. HumanRight 09:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection. Frequent unconstructive or disruptive edits from IP editors. Go D. Usopp (talk) 10:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent problematic edit was in April. Favonian (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC) Favonian (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Chronic addition of content against MOS:POSTNOM by IP editors. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 10:53, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: No need for move protection, asked protecting admin a week ago and they haven’t responded. Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like it ever was protected. Do you mean the article without the comma in the title? Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: That’s the page I meant (I fixed it in the header) Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- It still has a comma. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: ya I was asking if you could unprotect that redirect since having move protection on it is pointless. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- It still has a comma. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: That’s the page I meant (I fixed it in the header) Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like it ever was protected. Do you mean the article without the comma in the title? Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Waste of time. There's no good reason why anyone would rename a redirect. Favonian (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because dispute died down. Downgrade to semi. Second Action MAX (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @Robertsky: I admit more than two months is rather long for a full protection, but ... how are we to tell if "the dispute died down" when no one's been able to edit the article for that time, and there's nothing on the talk page to suggest that it has (in fact that talk page hasn't been used this year at all)? Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Black Kite is the protecting administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- OK, didn't realize that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case, @Black Kite was the one who put the two-month protection. – robertsky (talk) 02:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- And yeah... edit conflict and Reply tool... – robertsky (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Black Kite is the protecting administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – The current protection expires tomorrow. Favonian (talk) 09:46, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like edit this page in order to prepare an English biography entry for pianist Tamayo Ikeda (her French bio is available at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamayo_Ikeda) and later on publish it.
-> Could you please unlock this page for editing -> in addition, I would be interested to understand how to change the page template so that it become a biography page (as the French one)
thanks a lot ConAnimaWiki (talk) 05:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done – The page has been moved to Draft:Tamayo Ikeda (the correct place for an article draft) and you are free to edit it. It will need improvements according the review comments. Favonian (talk) 09:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC) |
14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC) |
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.
Invalid |showperm=
parameter. Please specify a valid time offset value.