Jump to content

User:FlyingKiwi/Dash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 86
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 124
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 149
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
Candidates for speedy deletion 85
Open sockpuppet investigations 176
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Candidates for speedy deletion
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Mass message sender
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD / PRODs

[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 28
Importance or significance not asserted 3
Other candidates 54

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 177 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Jewish lobby

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ―Howard • 🌽33 14:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

This is not a PIA article, and I do not see any recent disruption. I would decline. Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

2025 ICC World Test Championship final

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by unknown IP addresses MNWiki845 (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Straight Outta Compton

[edit]

Reason: Repeated addition of false/unsourced information. Instead of protecting this page for a week or a month, I suggest maybe use WP:ECP as its protection level to prevent editors from repeatedly changing the correct release date of this album (1989) to the-turned-out-to-be false year (1988). UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I see it's already at ANI. Good. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Suicide in South Korea

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Annh07 (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 114.10.134.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the page for six months. Will also leave CTOPS notice per GENSEX on the talk page as this relates to the material being regularly removed. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism/non-constructive edits by IPs. ApexParagon (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Chetsford (talk) 00:46, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

SypherPK

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated BLP vandalism, protected twice before. Laura240406 (talk) 22:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Houdini (Eminem song)

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Auto-confirmed account carelessly refuses to give sourcing for genre changes. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Given their past in this specific area, though, the next time they do it should be a block. They've gotten enough rope and have demonstrated they just don't care. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Burundi National Radio and Television

[edit]

Reason: Vandalism RustaviOri21 (talk) 00:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No vandalism at all since the protection was lifted. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

No Kings protests

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Michael Palance

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. NightWolf1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 02:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Michael Palance

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Blatant edit warring, check log. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Jane Goodall

[edit]

Reason: The article about this UK zoologist has been semi-protected for 11 years, with little vandalism. Frankster04 (talk) 16:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected Uh, as we usually say when people bring the lack of vandalism up as a reason to unprotect, maybe that's why? Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Crosspool

[edit]

Reason: The article about this suburb of Sheffield, England has been protected for nine and a half years, with little vandalism. Frankster04 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected "This room has been kept locked for nine years, and no one's stolen anything from it during that time. Therefore we should start leaving it unlocked." Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Jim Norton (Irish actor)

[edit]

Reason: This Irish actor's article has been semi-protected for ten years with little vandalism. Frankster04 (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected Not making the same point again. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Time having passed is a valid reason for unprotection (see WP:TRYUNPROT as well). I would hope that it doesn't take ten years to resolve an edit war. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

2006 FIFA World Cup

[edit]

Unprotection: No need for move protection. I tried asking the protecting admin a week ago and they haven’t responded. Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
    Unprotected Lifted move protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
    You just did the opposite. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
    @Daniel Case: you just did the opposite, you just fully protected the page Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
     Fixed Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Doug Ford

[edit]

Unprotection: No need for move protection. Asked protecting admin a week ago and they haven’t responded. Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
    Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Doug Ford, Jr.

[edit]

Unprotection: No need for move protection, asked protecting admin a week ago and they haven’t responded. Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
    Doesn't look like it ever was protected. Do you mean the article without the comma in the title? Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
    @Daniel Case: That’s the page I meant (I fixed it in the header) Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Bob the Builder

[edit]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it has been protected for 11 years. 201.215.182.56 (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Really? Did you overlook the very clear, most recent, edits in which it was protected indef THREE DAYS AGO for persistent socking? Zinnober9 (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined as that protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Consolidated B-24 Liberator

[edit]

Reason: Semi-protected for nine years, with little sockpuppetry. 201.215.182.56 (talk) 01:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected As I noted above, that's kind of a circular argument. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Morè (clan)

[edit]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because dispute died down. Downgrade to semi. Second Action MAX (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Robertsky: I admit more than two months is rather long for a full protection, but ... how are we to tell if "the dispute died down" when no one's been able to edit the article for that time, and there's nothing on the talk page to suggest that it has (in fact that talk page hasn't been used this year at all)? Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Black Kite is the protecting administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case, @Black Kite was the one who put the two-month protection. – robertsky (talk) 02:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
And yeah... edit conflict and Reply tool... – robertsky (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Poot Lovato

[edit]

Reason: This page was protected back in 2015 by JohnCD. It is an internet meme about Demi Lovato (see Know Your Meme) that has had remarkable staying power. There is currently a draft at User:Thegoofhere/Poot Lovato that I'm inclined to accept. gobonobo + c 02:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
MediaWiki:Movepage-reason-dropdown (request) 2025-06-14 06:19 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
15 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:College color (request) 2025-05-28 21:08 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Election box begin no change (request) 2025-06-04 11:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Starbox astrometry (request) 2025-06-04 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox election (request) 2025-06-10 22:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Template:Infobox election/row (request) 2025-06-10 22:26 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2015-04-13: "Highly visible template"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Mapframe (request) 2025-06-11 13:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2018-05-21: "Highly visible template"
Module:Political party (request) 2025-06-14 16:03 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
Module:College color/data (request) 2025-06-14 19:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-06-15 00:13 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)


WP:RFA

[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:IvanScrooge98

[edit]

Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Some of your given name and surname pages lack citations for the origins/meanings of the names. For example, the first sentence of Cencio has substantive information that requires a reference. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Added refs for Cencio. I’ll be more careful about sourcing info in lists. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done for now. Pages like Herraiz and Egaña (surname), botgh of which were created after I raised my concerns, are also lacking citations for the origins of the names. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Carigval.97

[edit]

The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 22:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:AdaWoolf

[edit]

I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Everything about your account looks great, however, Autopatrolled ultimately exists to protect WP:BLPs more than anything else so experience with BLPs is part of the demonstration needed to surmount criterion one. You've created many great articles but, insofar as I can tell, all about the deceased. And you only have a few dozen edits on BLPs. Please keep up the great work and request again. Chetsford (talk) 04:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:SuperSwift

[edit]

I have been creating Wikipedia articles for over 8yrs now, and have trained many editors on how to create encyclopedic articles. Granting me this right would reduce the backlog for articles to be reviewed. SuperSwift (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
SuperSwift, do you want to let us know how your editing approach has changed since the last decline two months ago? Schwede66 09:10, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
My editing approach has always been encyclopedic with attention to NPOV, notability, reliability of sources used. Recently, I created an article for the upcoming general elections in Nigeria and intend on creating for the presidential, national assembly, state assembly and governorship elections. My new focus is on creating articles for Nigerian towns and villages not already captured on en.Wiki, and also those of national assembly constituencies. SuperSwift (talk) 08:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done If your editing approach since the last decline hasn't changed, then I don't know why you would expect to be approved this time. Schwede66 04:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Wieditor25

[edit]

I'd like to request autopatrolled rights as I understand Wikipedia's notability and sourcing guidelines, and I aim to reduce patrolling workload. Wieditor25 (talk) 03:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done see WP:APCRITERIA criterion 3; while "very new editor" is not explicitly defined, WP:EXTENDED is a customary threshold. That said, please keep up the great work and request again. Chetsford (talk) 04:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. I'll check back in.Wieditor25 (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Transpoman

[edit]

This user has created 46 articles, 39 of which have been since 2021. While he creates only about one or two articles per month on average, virtually all of his recent creations have been well-sourced, policy-compliant articles (WP:N, WP:V) that need minimal modifications (see for example, Elmira Water Filtration Plant last month and 207 East 32nd Street this week). None of his articles have ever been deleted. It is my assessment that granting him autopatrolled rights would reduce the workload on patrollers, since I haven't spotted any issues with his work, other than minor grammatical quibbles. Epicgenius (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Good call, Epicgenius. Chetsford (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Векочел

[edit]

I have been editing on Wikipedia for several years now, and believe myself well-qualified for autopatrolled. Векочел (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC) Векочел (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Victor Ningthemcha

[edit]

I have made over 368 edits and created 16 articles with only 1 deletion, most of which are focused on my culture and homeland. Although my account is only about 2 months old, I have tried to follow Wikipedia’s content and sourcing policies closely. A fellow user (see User:Haoreima) suggested I request Autopatrolled rights based on the quality and relevance of my contributions. I would sincerely appreciate being considered for this permission and thank any administrator who supports me. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 09:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 16 articles. — MusikBot talk 10:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
@Victor Ningthemcha (Non-administrator comment) Sorry, but you don't meet the criteria yet for this right. This comment by @Haoreima, my interpretation, says that you need to at least be extended confirmed (300+ edits and 3 months after registration) and also gain long editing experience, along with its other rules. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Alright. but, how will I gain long editing experience? By making an article longer? Also, I sadly did not read "the gain long editing experience, along with its other rules" because I was hurriedly making another article. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Thanks for your contributions. Like cactus says, you'd need quite a bit more experience for being granted autopatrolled. Think 1000 edits and at least 25 articles. I expect that articles don't get draftified anymore: they need to be clearly ready for main space. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Alright, when can I remind you when I have reached that? And are number of page reviews required too? Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
1000 edits and at least 25 articles. Schwede66 17:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for file mover

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Destinyokhiria

[edit]

I have read and understand the image and media policies and would like the ability to move files when needed. Destinyokhiria (talk) 07:27, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Zero prior {{rename media}} requests. Please spend some time using that template to request file moves first, so we know you are actually familiar with when such moves are appropriate. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Ok Thanks Destinyokhiria (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:I.Mahesh

[edit]

I have been to UAE recently, and I could only upload those images here on Wikipedia directly. I have read and understand the image and media policies. I.Mahesh (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Zero prior {{rename media}} requests. You don't need this permission to upload files. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Starfall2015

[edit]

My reason for requesting page mover rights is that I often need to rename a page, but also in the case of page move vandals, I could move the page back to the correct title. I may have little experience, but it'll work out. Starfall2015 chat | about me 14:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 78 days and has 302 total edits. — MusikBot talk 14:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Firstly, you have shown no demonstratable need. Secondly, you very clearly need more experience, both in terms of edits (you only have 240 of 3000 required) and in terms of moves: you have zero RM participation and RMTR requests, and only one mainspace move - that of an article you created, which later got AfD redirected. (Non-administrator comment) —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 23:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per CX Zoom. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ZS Khumalo

[edit]

I am an extended confirmed user, a pending changes reviewer, and have over 5,500 edits since joining in April 2020. I regularly encounter pages that need to be moved to align with naming conventions, especially in areas I actively edit (politics, biographies, etc.). Granting page mover rights would allow me to assist more efficiently without needing admin intervention. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s naming policies and would use the tool responsibly. ZS Khumalo (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Blatant WP:Hat collecting * Pppery * it has begun... 21:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Dr. Blofeld

[edit]

I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: If you mean inviting members of a lot of WikiProjects, as I gather from your talk page, then I think this would go against the guidance that

Mass messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to want their attention drawn to the message [...] For other cases, less personalized means of communication are preferred. Wikipedia's primary means of communication is through posts on article talk pages, Wikipedia talk pages, or various noticeboards, including the Village Pump. [...] To reach the members of a given WikiProject, a post on that project's talk page can be used.

– SilverLocust (Jenson) 04:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I was thinking a few hundred of the most active editors, not 13,000! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

User:TechnoSquirrel69

[edit]

Hey there! I will once again be a coordinator for the Developing Countries WikiContest this year, for which I was granted temporary rights last time — see my previous request. In addition to a few newsletters for the contest, I also helped out with a few requests at WT:MMS (log). That's an area I wouldn't mind continuing to monitor outside of the contest period, and I may need this permission again if the DCWC continues for a third edition, so I'd like to request the right permanently. Please let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:JamesEMonroe

[edit]

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights:

To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi JamesEMonroe! I am not formally granting this permission (nor am I denying it), but I do think you should cut back a bit on the WP:STICKYDECO stuff on your userpage. While I have added the applicable CSS class to make the gadget function, many newbies—who frequently will have complaints when you revert their edits—will be unaware of the ability to tick the box to disable them, and they can be highly annoying/distracting/problematic for editors with sensory issues.

I wouldn't object if another admin chooses to grant the permission, but I wouldn't personally feel comfortable assigning newbie-interaction-heavy advanced permissions with the current amount of sticky decorations. Best regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Ah, Thank you! As you saw, I tried to add the collapsible boxes as a way for people to disable them (like the "clutter clear ->") as collapsing it would disable the code within. I was planning on making some changes actually, such as rearranging things and improving accessibility a bit, while always importantly keeping the talk page free from anything as it is. I hope it didn't appear unprofessional on me or too annoying.
But I see what you mean as some newer people might not see the boxes. and ill see what I could do. JamesEMonroe (talk) 04:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
@JamesEMonroe: On the default skin (Vector 2022) your Einstein gif blocks the "talk" button, the left molecule gif blocks the entire left sidebar, and the gifs on the right side block much of the right sidebar plus the "ClutterClear" button. That disrupts the interface by "preventing important links or controls from being easily seen or used". I would also urge you to fix that. – SilverLocust (Jenson) 06:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Good call. I removed it.
I didn't want to block the user talk page especially JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I guess it makes it hard when its fine on my screen but possibly different on others. let me see with the other things. sorry about that ^^ JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Arc Rev

[edit]

I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. — MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
This user has been renamed to TheArcRev whilst this request was open. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 01:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Wieditor25

[edit]

I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 22:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Danners430

[edit]

A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Weirdguyz

[edit]

Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

User:MouseCursor

[edit]

I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed recent changes patroller who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Element10101

[edit]

Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights.

By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:2RDD

[edit]

Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Cameremote

[edit]

Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Ophyrius

[edit]

Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Sardonism

[edit]

Hi there!

Despite my account having existed since 2009, I only have a modest edit count - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges.

I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding.

If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself.

Thank you very much for your time & consideration.

  ···sardonism · t · c 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Very Polite Person

[edit]

I think I'm supposed to have this as I see an option suddenly for pending changes on my watchlist, for the article Remote sensing? I was going to approve (it's just a newer user adding some book references), but I guess I cannot? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)@Very Polite Person Are you getting an option to accept it or it's written '[pending review]'? Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 08:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
It was I think just the text with no link/option to accept, and now it says "Checked". -- Very Polite Person (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
@Very Polite Person Well, it appears to tell editors(not only reviewers), that the edit hasn't been accepted by a reviewer yet. Please familiarise yourself with WP:RPC before applying for this permission. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 08:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ExplorerofSpace

[edit]

A little bit ago I made a request (which was declined - account new), I am again requesting this right because:

-My account is now over a month old

-My account is extended confirmed

-Lately, I have run across a lot of fine pending changes edits, but I can not approve them only revert them

As you can see, the main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism, you noted I should be a little more careful in doing so, which is what I did.

I think this right would allow me to reduce backlog, and do something I like (reverting vandalism) in a different way.

As you can see, I am also requesting the rollback right, which would help me with this process as while as reverting vandalism in general.

Whatever the outcome is, thank you. If it is not done, please provide me with steps I can take to get approved. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 00:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Review previous requests for more of a reason why I should get it (if needed). ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

User:PenguinEncounter2

[edit]

Hi! I do a lot of Recent Changes patrol for anti-vandalism purposes, and I'd like to be able to approve the good edits to protected pages I come across (instead of just reverting things...)

Thanks for your consideration. penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Dahawk04

[edit]

Hello, I have been working to revert vandalism and support other tasks in the volunteer center. I would like to expand my abilities to support Wikipedia by working to review pending changes. Thank you! Dahawk04 (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 23:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Hi - criterion 2 of WP:PCCRITERIA doesn't have an explicit requirement, however, we generally look at WP:EXTENDED as a minimum. However, please keep up the good work and apply again! Chetsford (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:SI09

[edit]

Hi, I tend to do a fair amount of RC Patrolling and therefore fairly regularly encounter edits requiring pending changes approval. I figured that since I'm reading and reviewing these edits anyway to assess for vandalism/need for reversion, it would probably be more efficient if I could also approve the good edits rather than a second pair of eyes needing to come by to do that. I've done a lot of RC Patrol over a long time, with a bit of article improvement work as I go along, so I'm quite familiar with the core policies relevant to reviewing, and I know where to find them if I happen to not remember one off-hand. I also do remember what starting out editing Wikipedia felt like and the excitement of an edit on a big page getting a speedy approval, and I'd like to do the same for the newcomers. SI09 (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

User:PawPatroler

[edit]

I want to protect Wikipedia from vandalism, and I think that pending changes are a good way to start. PawPatroler (talk) 00:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 15 days. — MusikBot talk 00:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
You are a pretty new user and your talk page is full of unattended user warnings and concerns. You also seem to be very proactive in sending articles to RFPP, for example, you requested to protect The Pokémon Company yesterday but it is nowhere close to persistent disruption. (Non-administrator comment) —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 01:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per CX Zoom. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Haj

[edit]

I’d like to expand my capabilities in regards to fighting vandalism and generally unproductive editing. Having recently gained rollback rights, I believe both would be useful when handling AV work while I patrol recent changes. I do understand the basics of copyvio, as well as a better understanding of the need for properly sourcing additions, and in general, handling vandals and disruptive editors. Happy to receive any constructive feedback if deemed appropriate.   haj • talk   01:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ZS Khumalo

[edit]

I’ve been contributing to Wikipedia by creating and editing articles related to South African and Eswatini politics, as well as uploading some images and adding infoboxes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core policies, especially regarding verifiability, neutral point of view, and reliable sourcing. I’d like to help review pending changes to ensure that only accurate and well-sourced edits are accepted, especially on articles vulnerable to vandalism or politically sensitive topics, to ensure the sustainable content quality of Wikipidia articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZS Khumalo (talk • contribs) 10:50, 12 June 2025

 Done Chetsford (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Liu1126

[edit]

I occasionally run into pending changes when patrolling recent changes and would like to be able to help reviewing and accepting them. I already hold rollback rights and have read and understood WP:RPC. Liu1126 (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:PawPatroler

[edit]

I understand that my previous request was denied, but you should give me a second chance; I have welcome many new users to the Teahouse, and have just made an edit on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Testing/1. Also, I have gotten less warning over the following weeks. Pending-changes can help me understand new users, and welcome them to said teahouse. It is up to you on how you want to answer, but I highly recommend it. I will be leaving a message a message on my talk page, so you can answer there as well. PawPatroler (talk) 00:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done "not done" means "not done". It's not appropriate under essentially any circumstances to re-request less than a day after your previous request was declined. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Starfall2015

[edit]

This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3][4]). — MusikBot talk 06:20, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:2RDD

[edit]

I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Cameremote

[edit]

Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)Hi, Cameremote! I see that you only have 5 undos in total. Are sure that you have read the criteria for rollback carefully? It's only granted to users who have some experience in dealing with vandalism. If you want to withdraw this request, you can type {{withdrawn}} in the wikitext mode. Cheers! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 10:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

User:TheArcRev

[edit]

Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Macaw*

[edit]

Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Ophyrius

[edit]

I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ExplorerofSpace

[edit]

I am back again. A little bit ago, I requested this right, and it was denied because it was not old enough.[1] My account is now one month old and I have extended confirmed permissions.[2] I was wondering if that is enough to get me this permission, thanks. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). — MusikBot talk 23:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
When looking at my request, please review prior requests for further reasoning. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=1292134740
  2. ^ https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/ExplorerofSpace

User:Camilasdandelions

[edit]

Hello! As I started to edit in Wikipedia (music), I have seen a lot of vadalisms (or bad edits) from some articles. But if one user spoiled it by multiple times, I have to rollback one by one, which takes a lot of time. So I request this permisson to make rollback for vadal easier, thanks! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four

[edit]

Rollback would allow me to more effectively revert bad edits found on patrol. I'm familiar with policy and have been using UltraViolet's pseudo-rollback to assist with reverts, always making sure to leave a descriptive edit summary and a relevant message on a user's talk when appropriate. Unfortunately I've encountered intermittent issues with uv's pseudo-rollback where it'll fail to apply or take a long time to complete. I believe being able to access rollback proper would resolve this. Additionally, I'd like to try some of the more bespoke patrolling tools like AntiVandal or Huggle, both of which require the rollback permission. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

User:LaffyTaffer

[edit]

I've been using Twinkle for counter-vandalism for a bit over a year now with little issue, but I've consistently heard that Rollback is faster and more effective. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 22:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:GalStar

[edit]

I'm re-requesting rollback to use tools that require this permission to more effectively combat vandalism. I believe I should have a high enough edit count. GalStar (talk) 03:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Doozy

[edit]

I was graciously referred here by Myrealnamm. My primary focus on Wikipedia is anti-vandalism work, so rollback would naturally be useful for me. I have read WP:ROLLBACK and feel like I have a good grasp on detecting good/bad faith edits. (I'd certainly hope so, if I got this far.) Thanks for your consideration. ⫷doozy (talk▮contribs)⫸ 05:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Iljhgtn

[edit]

Rollback appears useful for various reverts in specific instances when a serious vandal has made a rapid-fire succession of edits which need to be reverted. I enjoy using RedWarn, but rollback itself is handy here also for the AntiVandal tool I see. I have made around 70,000 edits and feel I qualify as a good candidate for this permission. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Pro-anti-air

[edit]

Requesting rollback rights to help me fight vandalism and use tools such as AntiVandal. --pro-anti-air (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: AntiVandal looks really interesting, but you can also request to be on their whitelist from what I read. So you do not actually need to get the Rollback permission if all you want is to use Antivandal. Iljhgtn (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ZS Khumalo

[edit]

I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and unconstructive edits more efficiently. I have over 5,500 edits, including work in areas related to South African history, politics, and culture. I'm interested in perfection and quality.

Thank you for your consideration. ZS Khumalo (talk) 19:51, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Blatant WP:Hat collecting * Pppery * it has begun... 21:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:SKAG123

[edit]

I have made almost 6,000 edits to Wikipedia and have been reverting vandalism for a few years using Twinkle and UltraViolet. I am familiar with the guidelines and processes of reverting and rollbackers would be helpful. SKAG123 (talk) 01:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Thomasfan1916

[edit]

I have over 500 mainspace edits without vanishing the articles. I am not the vanished user. I will not be blocked if I’m not vanishing the pages. In late 2023, I did revert a few articles that were vanished by the IPs. So, I will grant my Rollback right soon. Thomasfan1916 (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Dahawk04

[edit]

Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to support my anti-vandalism work.

I have been actively patrolling recent changes and reviewing edits for potential vandalism, often using filters and tools like ORES. I’ve been reverting obvious vandalism manually and warning users where appropriate.

I’m interested in increasing my efficiency with tools like Huggle and STiki, which require rollback rights. I understand the responsibilities of the rollback tool and will use it only for clear-cut vandalism or disruptive edits, not content disputes.

Thank you for considering my request. Dahawk04 (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

[edit]

I will request my rollbacker rights, so I can use AntiVandal tool. I've most frequently used Twinkle on my Gadgets since I'm autoconfirmed. After they reverted my edits for not following WP:MOS guideline, as well as vandalism. Absolutiva (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:DimensionalFusion

[edit]

Recently I've been finding myself making quite a few edit requests to template-protected pages – I believe I have the technical knowledge to complete these changes myself (with consensus or uncontroversial changes, obviously) so therefore I'd like to request template editor permissions DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 10:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 3)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: 5000)
  3. Not sure (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ?)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: n/a)
  5. Green tickY (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 3)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1)
Thanks for applying. Most of your edits to the template namespace are DYK-related, which are not really templates (despite being in the wrong namespace). But hopefully there are enough edits to real templates to assess this request — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to review my request! Incidentally, I have previously started discussions on changing the DYK namespaces to not be templates (although for a lack of enthusiasm, that never went ahead!) – I should note also that I do have 3 pending template-protected edit requests DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 17:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I have run it through the TPE criteria. For #3 it all depends on what are regarded as template edits. The criterion just says pages in the template or module namespace, so technically this should count. For #6, we are not quite there which suggests this request may be slightly premature. Perhaps you could continue working by submitting requests when needed and then pop back here later? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, absolutely. Though I would maybe count myself as having done 2 of the 5 successful major requests as the /row is template-protected seperatly to the main template – although that still only makes it two and there's no reason to lower that in this instance. I'll continue submitting requests and resubmit this if/when they are approved
Thanks for your time! DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 19:55, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per MSGJ. Also, my unscientific count of template edits excluding DYK nominations gives around 100 template edits, which is too few. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:43, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ZS Khumalo

[edit]

I would like to apply for Template Editor rights to be able to create and improve infobox templates for subjects like chiefdoms, royal institutions, and culturally significant topics that currently lack proper templates. I am very active in creating new pages and adding infoboxes to articles, and I’m fully aware of the risks and responsibilities involved in editing template code. I intend to use these rights to support underrepresented content areas with utmost care and ensure consistency across related pages. ZS Khumalo (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 0 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 20:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Blatant WP:Hat collecting * Pppery * it has begun... 21:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:FlyingKiwi/Dash&oldid=710992488"