Jump to content

User:Newsaholic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user page has been vandalized 9 times.
Wikipedia:TwinkleThis user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle!
This user enjoys reading the newspaper.
This user is a certified scuba diver.
newsThe only reality show this user watches is the news.
New pages

12 June 2025

WP:Recent changes

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

12 June 2025

Dashboard


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 72
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 126
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 16
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 144
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 42
Open sockpuppet investigations 149
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 4
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 6
Importance or significance not asserted 10
Other candidates 23

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent addition of unsourced info - IP editors have been making edits and claiming their edits are sourced with existing sources, which I’ve struggled to verify. Danners430 (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Isi96 (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 01:12, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement per Palestine-Israel conflict 76.68.113.121 (talk) 01:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 08:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP disruption-it's best to use semi-protection for at least... a week. PawPatroler (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Lots of IP Vandalism and misinformation. Gideonrmt (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP IanDBeacon (talk) 01:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Too much unsourced additions. Can't even follow. Beshogur (talk) 18:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent insertion of unsourced content by an IP-hopping editor. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per talk page, falls under community-authorised general sanctions for WP:RUSUKR. Also, some recent disruptive editing related to WP:CT/IPA. Referentis (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP disruption PawPatroler (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent and repeated sockpuppet additions. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Izno. Favonian (talk) 06:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page being repeatedly edited by sockpuppet accounts, please see report[1]. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page being repeatedly edited by sockpuppet accounts, please see report[2]. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppetry, please see report[3]. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Please move the page back to Road infrastructure case (for WP:STATUSQUO) and place a move protection. I have created the page with that name, and it has been moved twice for weak reasons. A potential move should be decided on a move request, not by further unilateral moves, and it should be the one proposing the move the one to initiate it and get consensus. The page is also currently at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates. Cambalachero (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Hello, I am Woni Spotts, the subject of this article. Since 2019, I have experienced repeated vandalism, false claims, and personal attacks on this page—many tied to a public rivalry. These incidents have affected both the main article and its Talk page, and often involve unsourced or misleading edits.

I respectfully request that this article be considered for semi-protection to prevent further disruption, and that future changes be reviewed under the Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy to ensure accuracy and fairness.

Thank you for your consideration and help in maintaining the integrity of this article. 2600:8802:3A09:6400:86C:E076:FB1:CD8 (talk) 03:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 08:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an IP changing anonymous user from Iran that keeps removing Windows as a platform. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to large amount of low-quality IP vandalism repeatedly changing the words "protests" to "riots". Prior talk page discussion was against this. BootsED (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and SPAs using Wikipedia in an attempt to rebrand Zee TV pages with logo and name changes that aren't even on its website. Other Zee pages already protected but requesting this as well. CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of Vandalism and factually incorrect changes Bennedict Rahul (talk) 06:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Current semi-protection is adequate. Favonian (talk) 08:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent and continuous petty vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) talk contribs ] 08:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2010 due to apparent sockpuppetry by Bambifan101. Now that it seems that Bambifan isn't active for quite some time, and the other Land Before Time film articles are not protected, perhaps it's time to unprotect this one after 15 years have past? The protecting administrator has long retired since 2014. BriDash9000 (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Bambifan isn't known for dropping the stick. He was active in January, and he'll likely be back. So this doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Can you point me to the incident? The last report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambifan101 was in January 2024. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
My mistake. Regardless, unprotecting a low-profile LTA target seems like it would be tempting fate. Keeping it protected doesn't cost anything, and the requesting editor is extended-confirmed, so it's not like the protection affects them. If they need to edit it, they can. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected but rather reduced to PCP, a protection type that didn't exist at the time this article was protected, and which seems appropriate in this case. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There are multiple legitimate publications proving the parts of information on this page to be false. 2404:4400:4112:3700:5DAF:358D:7C3B:4985 (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You can request an edit be made on the article's talk page, supported by reliable sources. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
This RfC just bloody closed.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: the article contains misleading information, biased framing, and/or incomplete or outdated sources that may misinform readers. This undermines Wikipedia’s principles of neutrality and verifiability. Due to the page's locked status, constructive edits and factual corrections by good-faith contributors are being blocked.

It is essential that more editors be allowed to participate in revising this content to restore accuracy, balance, and adherence to Wikipedia’s standards. I respectfully urge administrators to reconsider the current level of protection and allow broader community involvement. Rocher54 (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) You can request an edit be made on the article's talk page, supported by reliable sources. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:44, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The protection doesn't prevent "broader community involvement" in the slightest. That's what the talk page is for. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
18 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Module:College color (request) 2025-05-28 21:08 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-06-03 18:18 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Election box begin no change (request) 2025-06-04 11:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Starbox astrometry (request) 2025-06-04 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Fba/list (request) 2025-06-08 16:54 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ahecht on 2025-03-03: "High-risk template or module"
Module:OSM Location map (request) 2025-06-10 14:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2025-03-21: "High-risk template or module: 6070 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Family name explanation (request) 2025-06-10 21:49 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2023-05-18: "High-risk template or module: 76615 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Infobox election (request) 2025-06-10 22:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Template:Infobox election/row (request) 2025-06-10 22:26 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2015-04-13: "Highly visible template"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Mapframe (request) 2025-06-11 13:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2018-05-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Controversial (request) 2025-06-12 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox musical artist (request) 2025-06-12 07:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RFP= Requests for permissions

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

Account creator

[edit]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Some of your given name and surname pages lack citations for the origins/meanings of the names. For example, the first sentence of Cencio has substantive information that requires a reference. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Added refs for Cencio. I’ll be more careful about sourcing info in lists. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Everything about your account looks great, however, Autopatrolled ultimately exists to protect WP:BLPs more than anything else so experience with BLPs is part of the demonstration needed to surmount criterion one. You've created many great articles but, insofar as I can tell, all about the deceased. And you only have a few dozen edits on BLPs. Please keep up the great work and request again. Chetsford (talk) 04:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I have been creating Wikipedia articles for over 8yrs now, and have trained many editors on how to create encyclopedic articles. Granting me this right would reduce the backlog for articles to be reviewed. SuperSwift (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 08:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
SuperSwift, do you want to let us know how your editing approach has changed since the last decline two months ago? Schwede66 09:10, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
My editing approach has always been encyclopedic with attention to NPOV, notability, reliability of sources used. Recently, I created an article for the upcoming general elections in Nigeria and intend on creating for the presidential, national assembly, state assembly and governorship elections. My new focus is on creating articles for Nigerian towns and villages not already captured on en.Wiki, and also those of national assembly constituencies. SuperSwift (talk) 08:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to request autopatrolled rights as I understand Wikipedia's notability and sourcing guidelines, and I aim to reduce patrolling workload. Wieditor25 (talk) 03:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done see WP:APCRITERIA criterion 3; while "very new editor" is not explicitly defined, WP:EXTENDED is a customary threshold. That said, please keep up the great work and request again. Chetsford (talk) 04:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed

[edit]

File mover

[edit]

I have read and understand the image and media policies and would like the ability to move files when needed. Destinyokhiria (talk) 07:27, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Page mover

[edit]

My reason for requesting page mover rights is that I often need to rename a page, but also in the case of page move vandals, I could move the page back to the correct title. I may have little experience, but it'll work out. Starfall2015 chat | about me 14:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 77 days and has 241 total edits. MusikBot talk 07:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Firstly, you have shown no demonstratable need. Secondly, you very clearly need more experience, both in terms of edits (you only have 240 of 3000 required) and in terms of moves: you have zero RM participation and RMTR requests, and only one mainspace move - that of an article you created, which later got AfD redirected. (Non-administrator comment) CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 23:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Mass message sender

[edit]

I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: If you mean inviting members of a lot of WikiProjects, as I gather from your talk page, then I think this would go against the guidance that

Mass messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to want their attention drawn to the message [...] For other cases, less personalized means of communication are preferred. Wikipedia's primary means of communication is through posts on article talk pages, Wikipedia talk pages, or various noticeboards, including the Village Pump. [...] To reach the members of a given WikiProject, a post on that project's talk page can be used.

– SilverLocust (Jenson) 04:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I was thinking a few hundred of the most active editors, not 13,000! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey there! I will once again be a coordinator for the Developing Countries WikiContest this year, for which I was granted temporary rights last time — see my previous request. In addition to a few newsletters for the contest, I also helped out with a few requests at WT:MMS (log). That's an area I wouldn't mind continuing to monitor outside of the contest period, and I may need this permission again if the DCWC continues for a third edition, so I'd like to request the right permanently. Please let me know if you have any questions! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights:

To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi JamesEMonroe! I am not formally granting this permission (nor am I denying it), but I do think you should cut back a bit on the WP:STICKYDECO stuff on your userpage. While I have added the applicable CSS class to make the gadget function, many newbies—who frequently will have complaints when you revert their edits—will be unaware of the ability to tick the box to disable them, and they can be highly annoying/distracting/problematic for editors with sensory issues.

I wouldn't object if another admin chooses to grant the permission, but I wouldn't personally feel comfortable assigning newbie-interaction-heavy advanced permissions with the current amount of sticky decorations. Best regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Ah, Thank you! As you saw, I tried to add the collapsible boxes as a way for people to disable them (like the "clutter clear ->") as collapsing it would disable the code within. I was planning on making some changes actually, such as rearranging things and improving accessibility a bit, while always importantly keeping the talk page free from anything as it is. I hope it didn't appear unprofessional on me or too annoying.
But I see what you mean as some newer people might not see the boxes. and ill see what I could do. JamesEMonroe (talk) 04:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
@JamesEMonroe: On the default skin (Vector 2022) your Einstein gif blocks the "talk" button, the left molecule gif blocks the entire left sidebar, and the gifs on the right side block much of the right sidebar plus the "ClutterClear" button. That disrupts the interface by "preventing important links or controls from being easily seen or used". I would also urge you to fix that. – SilverLocust (Jenson) 06:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Good call. I removed it.
I didn't want to block the user talk page especially JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I guess it makes it hard when its fine on my screen but possibly different on others. let me see with the other things. sorry about that ^^ JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèvtalk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
This user has been renamed to TheArcRev whilst this request was open. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 01:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 22:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed recent changes patroller who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights.

By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there!

Despite my account having existed since 2009, I only have a modest edit count - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges.

I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding.

If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself.

Thank you very much for your time & consideration.

  ···sardonism · t · c 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

I think I'm supposed to have this as I see an option suddenly for pending changes on my watchlist, for the article Remote sensing? I was going to approve (it's just a newer user adding some book references), but I guess I cannot? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)@Very Polite Person Are you getting an option to accept it or it's written '[pending review]'? Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 08:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
It was I think just the text with no link/option to accept, and now it says "Checked". -- Very Polite Person (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
@Very Polite Person Well, it appears to tell editors(not only reviewers), that the edit hasn't been accepted by a reviewer yet. Please familiarise yourself with WP:RPC before applying for this permission. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 08:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

A little bit ago I made a request (which was declined - account new), I am again requesting this right because:

-My account is now over a month old

-My account is extended confirmed

-Lately, I have run across a lot of fine pending changes edits, but I can not approve them only revert them

As you can see, the main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism, you noted I should be a little more careful in doing so, which is what I did.

I think this right would allow me to reduce backlog, and do something I like (reverting vandalism) in a different way.

As you can see, I am also requesting the rollback right, which would help me with this process as while as reverting vandalism in general.

Whatever the outcome is, thank you. If it is not done, please provide me with steps I can take to get approved. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 00:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Review previous requests for more of a reason why I should get it (if needed). ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I do a lot of Recent Changes patrol for anti-vandalism purposes, and I'd like to be able to approve the good edits to protected pages I come across (instead of just reverting things...)

Thanks for your consideration. penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have been working to revert vandalism and support other tasks in the volunteer center. I would like to expand my abilities to support Wikipedia by working to review pending changes. Thank you! Dahawk04 (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 23:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I tend to do a fair amount of RC Patrolling and therefore fairly regularly encounter edits requiring pending changes approval. I figured that since I'm reading and reviewing these edits anyway to assess for vandalism/need for reversion, it would probably be more efficient if I could also approve the good edits rather than a second pair of eyes needing to come by to do that. I've done a lot of RC Patrol over a long time, with a bit of article improvement work as I go along, so I'm quite familiar with the core policies relevant to reviewing, and I know where to find them if I happen to not remember one off-hand. I also do remember what starting out editing Wikipedia felt like and the excitement of an edit on a big page getting a speedy approval, and I'd like to do the same for the newcomers. SI09 (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

I want to protect Wikipedia from vandalism, and I think that pending changes are a good way to start. PawPatroler (talk) 00:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 15 days. MusikBot talk 00:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
You are a pretty new user and your talk page is full of unattended user warnings and concerns. You also seem to be very proactive in sending articles to RFPP, for example, you requested to protect The Pokémon Company yesterday but it is nowhere close to persistent disruption. (Non-administrator comment) CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 01:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

I’d like to expand my capabilities in regards to fighting vandalism and generally unproductive editing. Having recently gained rollback rights, I believe both would be useful when handling AV work while I patrol recent changes. I do understand the basics of copyvio, as well as a better understanding of the need for properly sourcing additions, and in general, handling vandals and disruptive editors. Happy to receive any constructive feedback if deemed appropriate.   hajtalk   01:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)Hi, Cameremote! I see that you only have 5 undos in total. Are sure that you have read the criteria for rollback carefully? It's only granted to users who have some experience in dealing with vandalism. If you want to withdraw this request, you can type {{withdrawn}} in the wikitext mode. Cheers! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 10:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèvtalk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

I am back again. A little bit ago, I requested this right, and it was denied because it was not old enough.[1] My account is now one month old and I have extended confirmed permissions.[2] I was wondering if that is enough to get me this permission, thanks. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6][7]). MusikBot talk 23:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
When looking at my request, please review prior requests for further reasoning. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! As I started to edit in Wikipedia (music), I have seen a lot of vadalisms (or bad edits) from some articles. But if one user spoiled it by multiple times, I have to rollback one by one, which takes a lot of time. So I request this permisson to make rollback for vadal easier, thanks! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Rollback would allow me to more effectively revert bad edits found on patrol. I'm familiar with policy and have been using UltraViolet's pseudo-rollback to assist with reverts, always making sure to leave a descriptive edit summary and a relevant message on a user's talk when appropriate. Unfortunately I've encountered intermittent issues with uv's pseudo-rollback where it'll fail to apply or take a long time to complete. I believe being able to access rollback proper would resolve this. Additionally, I'd like to try some of the more bespoke patrolling tools like AntiVandal or Huggle, both of which require the rollback permission. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I've been using Twinkle for counter-vandalism for a bit over a year now with little issue, but I've consistently heard that Rollback is faster and more effective. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 22:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm re-requesting rollback to use tools that require this permission to more effectively combat vandalism. I believe I should have a high enough edit count. GalStar (talk) 03:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I was graciously referred here by Myrealnamm. My primary focus on Wikipedia is anti-vandalism work, so rollback would naturally be useful for me. I have read WP:ROLLBACK and feel like I have a good grasp on detecting good/bad faith edits. (I'd certainly hope so, if I got this far.) Thanks for your consideration. doozy (talkcontribs)⫸ 05:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 1
    Requests for unblock 76
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
    Candidates for speedy deletion 43
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 687
    Templates for deletion 121
    Categories for deletion 140
    Wikipedia files for discussion 38
    All redirects for discussion 207
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 31
    Possible copyright violations 29
    All articles proposed for deletion 351
    All files proposed for deletion 22
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 176
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 545
    Unknown copyright status 29
    Unknown source 12
    No non-free use rationale 6
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 16

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,270
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 453
    Protected against vandalism 5
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,699
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,402 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,197 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,328 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 41,312 0.59

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,506 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 549,758 7.85
    All articles lacking sources 54,656 0.78
    All unreferenced BLPs 3 0
    All articles needing additional references 492,780 7.03
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,676 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 106,950 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 290,367 4.14

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 146 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,462 0.02
    All articles to be split 1,122 0.02
    Unsorted Stubs 3 -
    Stub categories 20,135 -
    All uncategorized pages 437 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,215 0.77
    All articles needing copy edit 2,196 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,495 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,784 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,623 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 976
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 4,277
    All accuracy disputes 15,830
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 65,363

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links