User:SafariScribe
 | SafariScribe is busy attending to real life matters, although would later check few things on Wikipedia and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| Welcome | Scholar Archive | Pending changes | AFC help | WP Library |
| Newbie | NG | US | India | ENG | Scotland | Wales | [stat] |
|
ContactYou can leave me a message on my talk page.
|
Watchlist box
| XFD | N | N-1 | N-2 | N-3 | N-4 | N-5 | N-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFD | |||||||
| CFD | |||||||
| TFD | |||||||
| DRV |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 2c0f:f4c0:1000:e103::7ec (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined. User has said they will use their sandbox Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2405:201:a00b:c006:c5c0:3bc7:642d:50c0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- 102.164.103.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2a00:23c8:1383:b201:2dc3:2058:a450:1bc2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:53, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Y-8000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- 190.167.142.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 148.252.132.204 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) IP continues posting harassing messages on talk page. Magherbin (talk) 21:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Partially blocked. 148.252.128.0/19 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) has been partially blocked for six months. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:06, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Untamed1910 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism only account
- False Report OP blocked x 3 months. LTA -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- 190.167.142.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This user was automatically reported by Huggle due to reverted vandalism after a final warning. Please verify their contributions carefully, it may be a false positive. Patient Zerotalk 00:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: With all due respect, I was just starting to revert some of these articles that are being vandalized by other users, and I wasn't adding content that would be subject to violations of biographies of living people on some celebrities. See some positive results from all of this in my contributions. 190.167.142.147 (talk) 00:11, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- 67.193.142.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) continuing vandalized the page after many final warnings. Not here to contribute. Cassiopeia talk 00:23, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 4 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 4 |
| Other candidates | 20 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 175 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
User-reported
[edit]- Oxfordoxfordshire (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- Comment: This seems to be a reference to Oxford, Oxfordshire (the cathedral city) rather than Oxford University. — Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 14:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Agmarshall24 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username has edited on Draft:Center for Effective Organizations and Edward E. Lawler, both affiliated with USC Marshall School of Business. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ended up going with a warning following a discussion on my talk page. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- ChampionHelmets (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use (championhelmets.com) ☆ Bri (talk) 19:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Bri where have they promoted that website? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Fliptrickchallenge (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Submitted User:Fliptrickchallenge/sandbox to AfC about fliptrickchallenge.com. KylieTastic (talk) 22:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Brasiltenis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (brasiltenis.com.br). —Bruce1eetalk 00:02, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Sushidude21! (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Probably PIA-adjacent. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated incorrect changes of the infobox image by different Indian dynamic IPs in recent months, claiming to be typo fixes, which started last July. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 05:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vazulvonal of Stockholm is a long-term block evader who almost entirely edits in Hungarian nationalities for scientists from various Swedish IP addresses. A large percentage of the edits to the page over the last six months have been made by this editor. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the recent edits are vandalism from ip accounts. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 05:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent COI editing by people involved with the political group David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:20, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Per WP:PINKLOCK, template protection is not correct here, since the page is not protected due to its transclusion count (the 1 transclusion is the talk page). Requesting upgrade to full protection which does not go against WP:PP. Warudo (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial figure. Protection lapsed and IP vandalism started back up. Nswix (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Election Day is on Tuesday. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- agree with Muboshgu, IP vandalism, editwarring between non-WP:EXTENDED users, and significant portions of overlap around contemporary american politics, israel-palestine conflict, etc. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Surprising amount of vandalism by unregistered and new users over the past 6 months, for what should be a low-maintenance page. (Not the edit today; that was just a misunderstanding, but it made me reflect on previous edits.) I'd like to request pending changes protection for a year. — W.andrea (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing from multiple IP addresses to restore preferred version of the article. Referentis (talk) 16:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for semi-protection due to high level of IP vandalism Audit2020 (talk) 17:20, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent vandalism, important US politics CTOP page RaschenTechner (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement, related to WP:CT/A-A. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-A. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 20:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. » Gommeh (he/him) 20:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. » Gommeh (he/him) 20:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Three pages associated with one event
[edit]- UFC on ESPN: Sandhagen vs. Figueiredo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Bo Nickal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Reinier de Ridder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SPA's keep changing a competition result. Nswix (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: History on this team 74.12.181.3 (talk) 21:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper repeating the same vandal edit. Jalen Barks (Woof) 21:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Numerous instances of vandalism and users undoing each other's work Bubudu57 (talk) 22:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:50, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Persistent vandalism – IP hopper repeating the same vandal and attack page edit. Chew Yan Heng (talk) 23:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: edit war with IP. LR.127 (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. per per WP:ARBPIA. Altogether, it promotes pro-Israel narratives and bias. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 23:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. per WP:ARBPIA. Altogether, it promotes pro-Israel narratives and bias. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 23:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 23:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Repeated page moves without consensus and against naming conventions. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 23:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SKAG123 (talk) 00:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs editing the living person and reverted by users. Srich0731 (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Once again further sockpuppet attacks by SharkFinSoupEater. Request significant period of protection if not permanent. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High amount of vandalism from IP addresses. Generalez11 (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR. Srich0731 (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: Protection no longer needed after 16 years, which was semi-protected back in 2009. Absolutiva (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin @Future Perfect at Sunrise. Entranced98 (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Noting that the article falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Balkans or Eastern Europe.-- Ponyobons mots 16:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
There are reports of the new regime in Syria allowing Israeli jets to use its airspace, so Syria could now be listed as 'support' or 'proxy' on Israel's behalf. Israeli leaders have made no secret that they played a role in the dismantlement of the Assad regime through the weakening of Hezbollah, and deterring Iranian planes.
Additionally, there are allegations of unofficial support from Iraqi Kurdish groups and relations with Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as back-channel support from Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco.
Germany supports Israel and Merz has made that clear. Italy also supports. Probably limited Canadian and Australian support too. While, the Netherlands and Denmark also participated in "Operation Prosperity Guardian" in the Red Sea against the Houthis in Yemen.
On the other hand, Iran is supported by Iraq, Qatar, Turkey, Russia, North Korea, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It is not 'just' Israel and its Western allies and anti-regime Iranian proxies against the Iranian regime and its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen, but politically it is much more nuanced and many other countries are definitely involved here behind-the-scenes. 188.214.15.197 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Edit requests to that article should follow the WP:EDITXY guidelines because it is covered by 'contentious topics' rules. If the proposed changes do not follow those guidelines there is almost no chance that they will be implemented. And any claim should be accompanied by reliable sourcing that supports the claim. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Including this : " the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found Iran non-compliant with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years." has no bearing in the conflict per-se and is misleading the reader, as it just reads as a excuse for Israel assassinations
Moreso when :
There's no mention of the IAEA and CIA confirming Iran's claims of NOT working towards a Nuclear Weapon, while the US President publicly dismissed both reports ( Wich gives them credibility beyond doubt ) . These reports long predates the first Israel attack in the current War.
These news are all over internet by now. Shouldnt be hard to find sources, but i can do it easily.
I believe it should be noted in the opening of the article, as it is Israel's Claim/Excuse to attack Iran and it is being refuted by every involved party.
Removing/swaping the extract i quoted with the original reports will reflect the real ( reported ) status of the issue, and not just a narrative pushed by one side. 181.116.43.82 (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
I suggest removing the Npov, non-neutral edit: "Legal scholars saw the Israeli strikes as a violation of international law".
The reason for this is in the source itself, which claims a legal dispute. Therefore, presenting a specific legal side contradicts the principle of neutrality. I will note that a search of the Internet reveals two or three specific individuals with this opinion. I will note that the source talks about a publication on CNN as a fact. I will add that Israeli intelligence thought differently from the American one and accordingly there is a legal difference. I will note that from my memory such an assessment was not mentioned until after the bombing, the lengths were shorter. For example, this report in Hebrew, citing the New Times: https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-world/2025_q1/Article-0f2f019ebfdc491026.htm I will also mention this article that defines an attack on a nuclear reactor as an example of a justified preemptive attack: Shue, Henry and Rhodin, David (2007). Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press. p. 215.
Thank you in advance for your help and contribution to the free encyclopedia. 2A0D:6FC7:625:CDDE:594:A0C2:4FB1:9C04 (talk) 10:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
There is a chance that the incident is relevant to the article. North Korea is an ally of Iran. It has launched a nuclear program and American intelligence has had to deal with it. There have been talks with it.
I will add information from the article [1]: "The main dilemma in the field of nuclear arms control in the world today is related to the challenge of outlining policy effective, aimed at preventing the acquisition of nuclear weapons by new states determined to develop a military nuclear capability. These are states that launched covert military nuclear programs while they were members of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) — Iraq, Iran, and North Korea, but also Libya and Syria. These are states that explicitly denied that they were working to acquire a military nuclear capability but at the same time they exploited the weakness of the treaty's provisions and promoted military programs. This activity constituted a violation of the express commitment to remain non-nuclear, while pretending to uphold that very commitment. This unique situation made it very difficult for the powerful international actors tasked with upholding the treaty to effectively confront the nuclear ambitions of these states." For example, in the case of Iran, enrichment was at a level of 60%, enrichment that has no civilian uses, [2], [3] and the AMAD Project that provided the Iranians with knowledge [4] and was discontinued. In the Korean case, the military aspects are quite clear. Enrichment was carried out, plutonium and finally ballistic missiles (Iran already has them) [https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5067651,00.html]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0d:6fc0:99b:3900:9990:d2e8:cbb5:ce37 (talk) 13:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
NCRI Report: Iran’s Covert Nuclear Warhead Program and Missile Sites Exposed https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/nuclear/ncri-report-irans-covert-nuclear-warhead-program-and-missile-sites-exposed/
“Twenty years ago, Iran knew how to build a bomb,” Inbar said. “They built all the components, except for the nuclear core itself — at least that’s what’s known.” “Many of Iran’s facilities haven’t been examined by the International Atomic Energy Agency. If you’re only invited to see part of the program and can’t access key military sites, you don’t know what’s happening.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/could-irans-missiles-carry-nuclear-warheads-an-expert-breaks-down-the-threat/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0d:6fc0:99b:3900:9990:d2e8:cbb5:ce37 (talk) 13:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 18 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Underbar dk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- M.Billoo2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Brunasunagai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am participating in the DAC 62th Wikipedia contest, where I edited the aticle Placement (electronic design automation) but I cannot move it to the main page. I kept the neutrality, formality, and used articles and books as references to write this article. Brunasunagai (talk) 08:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done. You seem to misunderstand how the move function works - you cannot move one page on top of another. For your specific situation, you should make the changes to the original page directly. stwalkerster (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Arc Rev (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. — MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- This user has been renamed to TheArcRev whilst this request was open. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 01:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wieditor25 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Starfall2015 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Floating Orb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to be able to review edits that others have made, so I can check for vandalism. Floating Orb (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Floating Orb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was trying to revert a vandalism edit, but the disruptive editor had done multiple, making it harder for me to revert it. It would have been helpful to have rollback rights so I could undo it fully and quickly. Floating Orb (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not done You do not have enough experience reverting vandalism. In addition, I think you are still getting your bearings with editing in general and seem to be running into some issues. Given your current editing habits and experience, you are not ready for rollback yet. Malinaccier (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Nubzor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to more efficiently combat vandalism using advanced tools such as Huggle or AntiVandal. I'd like to believe that I always AGF when patrolling RC and I always leave an appropriate notice on users' talk page when reverting. Thank you for your time. Nubzor (T | C) 21:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Criticize (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting Access for Full "Rollback Priviledges" to Fight Vandalism and Intrusive editors as I am now able to be online daily, with always keeping WP:ROLLBACK in mind. See My Activity for qualification/eligibility. Criticize (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
- Wikipedia good article contributors
- Wikipedians willing to provide third opinions
- Wikipedians who have access to a university library
- WikiProject Nigeria participants
- WikiProject Africa participants
- American Wikipedians
- Wikipedians in the Welcoming Committee
- Wikipedian recent changes patrollers
- Wikipedians who use AutoWikiBrowser
- Wikipedians who use Discord