Wikipedia:Templates for discussion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2025

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice will be automatically removed by AnomieBOT (talk) when the backlog is cleared.

Skip to table of contents
Skip to current discussions
Purge this page

Shortcut

WP:TFD

XFD backlog
V	Apr	May	Jun	Total
CfD	0	59	15	74
TfD	1	21	41	63
MfD	0	1	0	1
FfD	0	3	2	5
RfD	0	13	5	18
AfD	0	10	37	47

On this page, the deletion or merging of templates and modules, except as noted below, is discussed.

How to use this page

What not to propose for discussion here

Shortcut

WP:TFD#NOT

The majority of deletion and merger proposals concerning pages in the template namespace and module namespace should be listed on this page. However, there are a few exceptions:

Stub templates: Stub templates and categories should be listed at Categories for discussion, as these templates are merely containers for their categories, unless the stub template does not come with a category and is being nominated by itself.
Userboxes: Userboxes should be listed at Miscellany for deletion, regardless of the namespace in which they reside.
Speedy deletion candidates: If the template clearly satisfies a criterion for speedy deletion, tag it with a speedy deletion template. For example, if you wrote the template and request its deletion, tag it with {{Db-author}}. See also WP:T5.
Policy or guideline templates: Templates that are associated with particular Wikipedia policies or guidelines, such as the speedy deletion templates, cannot be listed at TfD separately. They should be discussed on the talk page of the relevant guideline.
Template redirects: List at Redirects for discussion.
Moving and renaming: Use Wikipedia:Requested moves.

Reasons to delete a template

Shortcut

WP:TFD#REASONS

The template violates some part of the template namespace guidelines, and can't be altered to be in compliance.
The template is redundant to a better-designed template.
The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used.
The template violates a policy such as Neutral point of view or Civility and it can't be fixed through normal editing.

Templates should not be nominated if the issue can be fixed by normal editing. Instead, you should edit the template to fix its problems. If the template is complex and you don't know how to fix it, WikiProject Templates may be able to help.

Templates for which none of these apply may be deleted by consensus here. If a template is being misused, consider clarifying its documentation to indicate the correct use, or informing those that misuse it, rather than nominating it for deletion. Initiate a discussion on the template talk page if the correct use itself is under debate.

Listing a template

Shortcuts

To list a template for deletion or merging, adhere to the following three-step process. Utilizing Twinkle is strongly recommended as it automates and simplifies these steps. To use Twinkle, click TW in the toolbar (top right of the page), then select XFD. Do not include the "Template:" prefix in any of the steps, unless specifically instructed otherwise.

Step	Instructions
I: Tag the template.	Add one of the following codes to the top of the template page: For deletion: `{{subst:Tfd}}` For deletion of a sidebar or infobox template: `{{subst:Tfd\|type=sidebar}}` For deletion of an inline template: `{{subst:Tfd\|type=inline}}` For deletion of a module: `{{subst:Tfd\|type=module\|page=name of module}}` at the top of the module's `/doc` subpage. For merging: `{{subst:Tfm\|name of other template}}` For merging an inline template: `{{subst:Tfm\|type=inline\|name of other template to be merged}}` Other values for `\|type=` are available, see Template:Template for discussion § Display on articles Note: If it is an inline template, do not add a newline between the TfD notice and the code of the template. If the template to be nominated for deletion is protected, make a request for the TfD tag to be added, by posting on the template's talk page and using the `{{editprotected}}` template to catch the attention of administrators or template editors. For templates designed to be substituted, add `<noinclude>...</noinclude>` around the TfD notice to prevent it from being substituted alongside the template. Do not mark the edit as minor. Use an edit summary like `Nominated for deletion; see [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:name of template]]` or `Nominated for merging; see [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:name of template]]`. Before saving your edit, preview your edit to ensure the Tfd message is displayed properly. Multiple templates: If you are nominating multiple related templates, choose a meaningful title for the discussion (like "American films by decade templates"). Tag every template with `{{subst:Tfd\|heading=discussion title}}` or `{{subst:Tfm\|name of other template\|heading=discussion title}}` instead of the versions given above, replacing `discussion title` with the title you chose (but still not changing the `PAGENAME` code). Related categories: If including template-populated tracking categories in the TfD nomination, add `{{Catfd\|template name}}` to the top of any categories that would be deleted as a result of the TfD, this time replacing `template name` with the name of the template being nominated. (If you instead chose a meaningful title for a multiple nomination, use `{{Catfd\|header=title of nomination}}` instead.) TemplateStyles pages: The above templates will not work on TemplateStyles pages. Instead, add a CSS comment to the top of the page: `/* This template is being discussed in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Help reach a consensus at its entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025_June_9#Template:template_name.css */`
II: List the template at TfD.	Edit today's TfD log and paste the following text to the top of the list: For deletion: `{{subst:Tfd2\|template name\|text=Why you think the template should be deleted. ~~~~}}` For merging: `{{subst:Tfm2\|template name\|other template's name\|text=Why you think the templates should be merged. ~~~~}}` If the template has had previous TfDs, you can add `{{Oldtfdlist\|previous TfD without brackets\|result of previous TfD}}` directly after the `\|text=` before the why (or alternatively, after the `}}` of the `Tfd2/Catfd2`). Use an edit summary such as `Adding [[Template:template name]]`. Multiple templates: If this is a deletion proposal involving multiple templates, use the following: `{{subst:Tfd2\|template name 1\|template name 2 ...\|title=meaningful discussion title\|text=Why you think the templates should be deleted. ~~~~}}` You can add up to 50 template names (separated by vertical bar characters `\|` ). Make sure to include the same meaningful discussion title that you chose before in Step 1. If this is a merger proposal involving more than two templates, use the following: `{{subst:Tfm2\|template name 1\|template name 2 ...\|with=main template (optional)\|title=meaningful discussion title\|text=Why you think the templates should be merged. ~~~~}}` You can add up to 50 template names (separated by vertical bar characters `\|` ), plus one more in `\|with=`. `\|with=` does not need to be used, but should be the template that you want the other templates to be merged into. Make sure to include the same meaningful discussion title that you chose before in Step 1. Related categories: If this is a deletion proposal involving a template and a category populated solely by templates, add this code in the `\|text=` field of the `Tfd2` template but before the text of your rationale: `{{subst:Catfd2\|category name}}`
III: Notify users.	Please notify the creator of the template nominated (as well as the creator of the target template, if proposing a merger). It is helpful to also notify the main contributors of the template that you are nominating. To find them, look in the page history or talk page of the template. Then, add one of the following: For deletion: `{{subst:Tfd notice\|template name}}` ~~~~ For merging: `{{subst:Tfm notice\|template name\|other template's name}}` ~~~~ to the talk pages of the template creator (and the creator of the other template for a merger) and the talk pages of the main contributors. It is also helpful to make any interested WikiProjects aware of the discussion. To do that, make sure the template's talk page is tagged with the banners of any relevant WikiProjects; please consider notifying any of them that do not use Article alerts. Deletion sorting lists are a possible way of doing that. Multiple templates: There is no template for notifying an editor about a multiple-template nomination: please write a personal message in these cases.

Consider adding any templates you nominate for TfD to your watchlist. This will help ensure that the TfD tag is not removed.

After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors

While it is sufficient to list a template for discussion at TfD (see above), nominators and others sometimes want to attract more attention from and participation by informed editors. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing.

To encourage participation by less experienced editors, please avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations in the messages you leave about the discussion, link to any relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the TfD discussion page itself. If you are recommending that a template be speedily deleted, please give the criterion that it meets.

Notifying related WikiProjects

WikiProjects are groups of editors that are interested in a particular subject or type of editing. If the article is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, they may welcome a brief, neutral note on their project's talk page(s) about the TfD. You can use {{subst:Tfd notice}} for this.

Tagging the nominated template's talk page with a relevant Wikiproject's banner will result in the template being listed in that project's Article Alerts automatically, if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a template with {{WikiProject Physics}} will list the discussion in Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.

Notifying substantial contributors to the template

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the template and its talkpage that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, look in the page history or talk page.

At this point, you've done all you need to do as nominator. Sometime after seven days have passed, someone else will either close the discussion or, where needed, "relist" it for another seven days of discussion. (That "someone" may not be you, the nominator.)

Once you have submitted a template here, no further action is necessary on your part. If the nomination is successful it will be added to the Holding Cell until the change is implemented. There is no requirement for nominators to be part of the implementation process, but they are allowed to if they so wish.

Also, consider adding any templates you nominate to your watchlist. This will help ensure that your nomination tag is not mistakenly or deliberately removed.

Twinkle

Twinkle is a convenient tool that can perform many of the posting and notification functions automatically, with fewer errors and missed steps than manual editing. To use Twinkle, click its dropdown menu in the toolbar in the top right of the page: TW , and then click 'XFD'.

Note that Twinkle does not notify WikiProjects, although many of them have automatic alerts. It is helpful to notify any interested WikiProjects that don't receive alerts, but this has to be done manually.

Discussion

Anyone can join the discussion, but please understand the deletion policy and explain your reasoning.

People will sometimes also recommend subst or subst and delete and similar. This means the template text should be "merged" into the articles that use it. Depending on the content, the template page may then be deleted; if preserving the edit history for attribution is desirable, it may be history-merged with the target article or moved to mainspace and redirected.

Templates are rarely orphaned—that is, removed from pages that transclude them—before the discussion is closed. A list of open discussions eligible for closure can be found at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Old unclosed discussions.

Closing discussion

Administrators should read the closing instructions before closing a nomination. Note that WP:XFDcloser semi-automates this process and ensures all of the appropriate steps are taken.

Current discussions

June 9

Template:412 Railway line Poland

Template:412 Railway line Poland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I was reviewing a draft that is due to be deleted via CSD G13, Draft:Railway line No. 412 and it is the only page transcluded to this template. The draft said the railway line is no longer in use so I think this template will go unused. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Doctor Who companion

Template:Doctor Who companion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary fork of {{Infobox character}}. Only addition is a random arbitrary numbering scheme for companions (e.g. "The 49th Companion") -- Alex_21_TALK 00:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 8

Template:Infobox Aceh's local parties

Template:Infobox Aceh's local parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:Infobox political party. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Alfarizi M (talk) 21:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bridges in India

Template:Bridges in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Far too wide scope for a useful template. The Banner talk 13:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner, By meaning wider scope, you meant wider in the geographic sense or on the scope of the constituents. If you could please clarify the reason more appropriately, then would be able to add on to the discussion. So, if you do believe that the scope is wide, would it be preferable to have a template split geographically or by type of bridge? While not wanting to base an argument based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, there are similar templates that certainly do exist. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split geographically at least, as this template has the potential to become excessively big. And please fix the links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 14:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 7

Template:June 2025 Los Angeles protests

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the title linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:June 2025 Los Angeles protests (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I am nominating this article for deletion because it appears to be premature and lacks sufficient independent coverage to establish encyclopedic notability. While the events described are recent and have garnered media attention, the article currently lacks the depth, context, and reliable secondary sources necessary for a comprehensive encyclopedia entry. It may be more appropriate to integrate this information into broader articles, such as 2025 United States protests against mass deportation or 2025 in California, until more substantial coverage becomes available.

Dahawk04 (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Unreferenced2

Template:Unreferenced2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was kept at a previous TfD because editors were unclear about whether this template was being used. This search which lists all uses of the template comes up empty. Additionally, the placement of the {{unreferenced}} tag violates MOS:ORDER—which says maintenance banners belong at the top of the article, not in the #References section—and we shouldn't have templates which help people violate guidelines. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 14:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 6

Only two viable links, already well linked. WP:NENAN --wooden superman 11:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Børning

Template:Børning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two articles, already well linked. WP:NENAN --wooden superman 08:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 5

Template:Suffixed Interstates

Template:Suffixed Interstates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a defining characteristic and better off handled as a list. Of note, the List of suffixed Interstate Highways is linked from the bottom of every infobox for an Interstate Highway already, so this navbox is unnecessary. Imzadi 1979 → 23:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I think this Template will help users to be able to navigate around different suffixed interstates easier instead of having to go to one main page. Breck0530 (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with @Breck0530, we should keep this, it's more easier. Noob from2 (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX criteria 1, 3, 5. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dirty Hit

Template:Dirty Hit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is general consensus through previous TfDs that record label navboxes don't provide a close enough association between the artists signed to the label to warrant them. This is a case where categorization (Category:Dirty Hit artists) works better. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Law of Mexico

Template:Law of Mexico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a navbox that only contains red links (excluding in the title). It was created in 2013 and since then none of the entries have been created into an article. 6ii9 (talk) 15:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 4

100 Women by BBC navboxes

Template:100 Women by BBC in 2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:100 Women by BBC in 2020 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:100 Women by BBC in 2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:100 Women by BBC in 2022 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:100 Women by BBC in 2023 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:100 Women by BBC in 2024 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Being delegates is little more than WP:PERFNAV. Appearing on the 100 Women (BBC) list is not suitable for navbox inclusion. --wooden superman 13:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete, over navboxing. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 3

Template:Minilink

Template:Minilink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No longer used. Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 14:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unreferenced-law section

Template:Unreferenced-law section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Redundant to {{Unreferenced law|section}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Bearian (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as template creator, it having outlived its usefulness. BD2412 T 00:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timeline National Football League (active teams)

Template:Timeline National Football League (active teams) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or incoming links. Assadzadeh (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Assadzadeh (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2

Template:Conservatism in Singapore

Template:Conservatism in Singapore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The title suggests a broad overview of conservative thought or political movements in the country, but the template exclusively covers the People's Action Party (PAP) and its politicians, even including the PAP logo as its image. This gives an inaccurate impression that conservatism in Singapore is limited to the PAP, when in fact other parties and figures, some of whom oppose the PAP, also hold conservative views on social, economic or cultural issues. As it stands, this template is misaligned, misleading and frankly unnecessary. MordukhovichAleakin (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. That can be solved by improving the template, which is not a reason to delete the template itself. ProgramT (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 09:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The template should stay or be changed into a infobox instead. Don’t know why, we should delete it. Why are so many templates, being removed from articles, recently?! - 216.49.130.12 (talk) 20:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning delete' as OR. We don't have an article on Conservatism, and equating "Conservatism" to one political party seems a potentially misleading (as nom notes) way to cover the topic. CMD (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom GodzillamanRor (talk) 13:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CC BY 3.0 US

Template:CC BY 3.0 US (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete CC license; we should not encourage the use of outdated licenses any more than necessary. If you truly need to use an obsolete license, Commons has its own c:Template:Cc-by-3.0-us. Zero tranclusions, so we are safe to delete. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 02:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CC BY-SA 2.5 BR

Template:CC BY-SA 2.5 BR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete CC license; we should not encourage the use of outdated licenses any more than necessary. If you truly need to use an obsolete license, Commons has its own c:Template:Cc-by-sa-2.5-br. Zero tranclusions, so we are safe to delete. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 02:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Old discussions

June 1

"Talk Page Proposal" series

[edit] These templates were created for the purpose of creating proposals. These proposals would be placed on the talk pages of any subject, draw attention and induce focused insightful conversation, and structures a voting system as to whether the proposal would be accepted or rejected; these proposal votes usually end after two weeks. The voting system also comes included with a checking system, so that talkers can see how the number of supporters and deniers fare against each other; if one number drastically outweighs the other, the discussion can be closed early at one week. The series consists of, and is affiliated with, the following pages:

Template:Talk Page Proposal
Category:Talk pages with ongoing proposals
Template:Talk Page Proposal Settled
Category:Talk pages with settled proposals
Template:Talk Page Proposal check
Template:Talk Page Proposal outcome — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThunderBrine (talk • contribs)

Comment: There do not appear to be any nominations in this section. Was this meant as a comment in one or more of the sections below? – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is no nomination in this section. It was meant to group together the templates currently on trial, which are Template:Talk Page Proposal and Template:Talk Page Proposal check. The actual nominations are listed below in the named sections. ThunderBrine (talk; contributions; watchlist; sandbox) 19:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talk Page Proposal

Template:Talk Page Proposal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It alerts people to a discussion/proposal currently happening. ThunderBrine (talk; contributions; watchlist; sandbox) 19:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as encouraging vote-counting rather than consensus-forming. With a margin of 3 votes, over 50% approval is required. 66.7% approve the first place option. CONSENSUS REACHED should not appear in any template. (See also WP:NOSUMMARIES.) Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 00:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not applicable to this template specifically; This template does not have vote-counting, or any comparison of numbers. This template simply categorizes what pages currently contain an ongoing discussion with a proposal attached.

It expects users to click on Category:Talk pages with ongoing proposals in order to easily navigate the wiki to address proposals that are currently being issued. ThunderBrine (talk; contributions; watchlist; sandbox) 03:11, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That category does not appear to have ever existed. That, perhaps, shows that this template is not useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is absolutely no need for this level of formalization. Talk page proposals can happen and be resolved by the normal editing process, or via WP:RFC if really needed. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talk Page Proposal check

Template:Talk Page Proposal check (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It documents the comparison of supporters and deniers of a subject when deciding how to proceed forward. ThunderBrine (talk; contributions; watchlist; sandbox) 19:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as encouraging vote-counting rather than consensus-forming. With a margin of 3 votes, over 50% approval is required. 66.7% approve the first place option. CONSENSUS REACHED should not appear in any template. (See also WP:NOSUMMARIES.) Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 00:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is absolutely no need for this level of formalization. Talk page proposals can happen and be resolved by the normal editing process, or via WP:RFC if really needed. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Latest revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2025

How to use this page

What not to propose for discussion here

Reasons to delete a template

Listing a template

After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors

Notifying related WikiProjects

Notifying substantial contributors to the template

Twinkle

Discussion

Closing discussion

Current discussions

100 Women by BBC navboxes

Old discussions

"Talk Page Proposal" series

Template:Furry-con-list

Rugby union squad navigation templates

Completed discussions