Wikipedia:XfD today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 22	June 24 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Marko Ćopić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable sources to indicate notability Nixleovel (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Serbia. Nixleovel (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable unreleased film. Most sources are not independent of the subject. Production has been halted due to unavailability of costars [1]. No update since November of 2024. Draftify if release is still possible, somehow. DareshMohan (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of incidents of violence against women in Spain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:SALAT, this is far too general a topic to make a manageable list. (List of incidents of violence against women is also up for Afd.) Clarityfiend (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Lists, and Spain. Shellwood (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prashant Madanmohan Leander

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page, created by a single-purpose account who recreated this page several times in draft space. See: Draft:Prashant Madanmohan and Draft:Xternal, which indicates that author is either a paid editor or likely has a conflict of interest. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't show sufficient coverage from reliable sources, and there's little indication that subject warrants a standalone article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, India, and Armenia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Informal economy of South Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Llm-generated page including llm-generated sourcing. The sources bear minimal relationship to the text they are citing. For example, the first source in the lead supports essentially nothing in the lead, and similarly does not support its use in the Women's Contributions and Gender Disparities section/paragraph. That most are abstract pages that link onwards to a proper source is a further indication of an llm trying to find something vaguely related to the article title. CMD (talk) 07:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and India. CMD (talk) 07:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National-revolutionary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Synthy OR mess, and apparently the previous attempt was a synthy OR mess as well. Does not distinguish from revolutionary nationalism and generally appears to lack coherence as a distinct topic. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cilovluq genocide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. The topic lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent, and verifiable sources. Most of the references are either partisan, locally produced, or non-scholarly, and the event is not discussed in academic or mainstream historical literature. Furthermore, the article appears to violate Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy by presenting a one-sided narrative without acknowledging other perspectives or providing balanced context. Without reliable sources and a neutral tone, this topic does not merit a standalone article on Wikipedia.

Wikivro (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not use encyclopedic language, its content and title are heavily biased, and it cites government-linked Turkish and Azerbaijani sources. If there was a massacre, it should be based on reliable and scholarly works, not Anadolu Agency, etc. ----Երևանցի ^talk 07:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Hastings (model ship maker)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biography that only has 2 different sources (different pages from the same website are still 1 source). One of which is a non-independent obituary. The most useful of the other source is primarily just a self written article which basically makes this a WP:AUTOBIO. This issue was noted during the AFC process by Cactusisme but the article was moved to the mainspace anyways. Searching for James Hastings brings up numerous unrelated individuals and modifying the search with terms like ship models brings up nothing. Moritoriko (talk) 06:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Moritoriko (talk) 06:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Isfahan explosion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Iran. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was internationally reported including by non-typical sources such as MTV. There are multiple stories here which contribute to broad coverage and GNG. One is the industrial disaster, but also the profile of the related corporations and players responsible. Also sources have connected this explosion to the military manufacturing of weaponized drones, and that weapons manufacturing is of international concern beyond typical stories of industrial disaster. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Engineering and Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not look to be a notable institution. Barely any in-depth coverage on the same. Most of it seems to be trivial mention or paid PR Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and Uttar Pradesh. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep this is a public university with over 1000+ students and there is some coverage of it in various sources: [2] [3]. It is not extensive but probably enough for an University. --hroest 15:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

D1 Denby Darts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local bus route with limited history and fails WP:GNG Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England. Shellwood (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Team Pennine under the existing Denby Darts heading. This article is too short by itself but would fit into the main article for the service's operator. // PYRiTEmonark // talk // 19:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are four different newspaper articles from 2019 to 2021 covering the subject. Contrary to the nominator's statement, this passes WP:GNG. Garuda3 (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It fails WP:SIGCOV. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how - I can't access the 6 July piece but the other articles are entirely about the D1 service or its former number, the 233. Garuda3 (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This actually goes beyond what WP:SIGCOV specifies, which is Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Garuda3 (talk) 09:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You got to read up on WP:BUSROUTE.

There is enough information on each page to write a sizeable article - There isn't

Writing the article(s) together or within other articles would exceed article size guidelines - There's already a section on Team Pennine about their Denby Darts branding and there is no further history within this article that makes it worth retaining

Additionally, there is no reason to believe that a bus route between Denby Dale and Huddersfield which both aren't major cities is worth including with the extent of history that is out there on the route. I rest my case. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balanced force

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New page reviewer said:

I was very tempted to move this page to draft as failing WP:TEXTBOOK with too much mild WP:Peacock and some WP:SYNTH, for instance including Newton's first law. Instead I did a quick clean. It may well still end up being challenged either with a PROD or at AfD because it is not fundamentally different from other, existing mechanics articles which are more extensive.

Creator is now indef blocked, so not able to work on it further. I am ambivalent as to whether this should be kept, deleted or redirected, but this decision needs input from subject experts. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954:, the reviewer whom I have quoted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can see the content of the article has nothing to do with the reason for the block. Let's get a couple of other opinions, and perhaps even some WP:HEY edits. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:54, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sidi Mohamed Ould Bidjel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. The only reference currently is a database and a search on the Eastmain MENA database came up empty. Let'srun (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Sport of athletics. Let'srun (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Habst and @BeanieFan11, considering he was a flag bearer, there might be something about him. Svartner (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there's going to be more on him, however it will be offline – and apparently we can never consider the possibility of coverage existing that we haven't found. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If that were the case, then every article would be kept under WP:MUSTBESOURCES. However, we have clear policies that require that secondary coverage be included in the article for all sportspeople, no matter who they are. Let'srun (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article comes after coverage is found, not before. Geschichte (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trampsta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail to meet GNG and SNG WP:COMPOSER Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:NMUSIC. Svartner (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Something is odd here. Very few press articles, but invited in festivals worldwide and YouTube video have millions of views. While the number of views isn't a criteria per se, it could be valuable to keep this article as a placeholder to answer the question "who's that artist with lot of views?", that was my motivation creating that article. From WP:NMUSIC, could weakly match Has composed a number of notable melodies, tunes, or standards used in a notable music genre.. --Dereckson (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Views on YouTube do not guarantee notability. Svartner (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Asian Studies Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Unreferenced for 15 years and fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and New Zealand. LibStar (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom FMSky (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Learned societies, like individual academics, are important and their articles should be kept. Our existing policies have forced the deletion of way too many articles about learned societies and other nonprofits. It's probably time to develop a more inclusive policy for learned societies. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please state how it meets notability. LibStar (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If there is interest in changing policy, an individual AfD is not the place to do so.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Šušaja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small skirmishes like this one, from an insurgency in which a total of several dozen people were killed over the course of two years, clearly falls under WP:NOTNEWS. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Albania, Serbia, and Yugoslavia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It seems like Amanuensis Balkanicus is on a bit of a rant, trying to delete anything that even mentions an Albanian insurgent victory. A battle that lasted four days, involved multiple APCs, seven tanks (one of which was damaged), as well as special forces, and left around 9 to 12 participants dead or wounded—including one member of the SAJ special forces—is clearly not a small skirmish. If we're going by that logic, why not start an AfD for the Battle of Oraovica too? GermanManFromFrankfurt (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this was a rather big escelation in insurgency, hence meets the criteria of WP:N and should stay. Durraz0 (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Neither of these keep !votes show that the topic meets WP:GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: per the last relisting comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Southern Syria bombings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, insignificant bombing in Syria, likely does not warrant an article. Ecrusized (talk) 11:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Mangoe (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this was made way after the bombing and is up to date. JaxsonR (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is the first attack by ISIS against the Syrian Transitional Goverment JaxsonR (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Southern Syria clashes (April–May 2025), which is currently a hodgepodge of reporting about clashes involving the panoply of Israeli, Druze, and Syrian forces, and where this would fit in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longhornsg (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is one of the first attacks by the Islamic State against the Syrian government after the fall of Assad Farcazo (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty Useless Yesyesmrcool (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brest attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An ambush with 2 overall deaths doesn't meet WP:N criteria and falls under WP:NOTNEWS. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and North Macedonia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with 2001 insurgency in Macedonia. I think it is relevant enough for the main article. There are at least two post-conflict sources about it. StephenMacky1 (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone: It's safe to assume anyone typing in Brest attack will be looking for the disambiguation page Battle of Brest, not this incident. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep BUT ONLY IF WP:RS are found. I am no expert in this area. Wynwick55gl (talk) 08:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wynwick55gl: An event simply being mentioned in WP:RS is not the foremost criterion when deciding whether to keep or delete an article, see WP:EVENTCRITERIA. This is especially true of an event that is just another Tuesday in Chicago in terms of fatalities. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is laughable. Are you seriously comparing murders committed in a city like Chicago, which has more inhabitants than all of North Macedonia combined, with this insurgency? I don’t see rebels taking over parts of Chicago and ambushing some of its highest ranking politicians. And besides, a military engagement doesn’t need 500 casualties to deserve its own article, otherwise you could start AfD's for 90% of the wikipedia articles related to combat history. GermanManFromFrankfurt (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, what's laughable is your belief that Wikipedia is an indiscriminate repository of information, when we have entire policy guidelines and essays explaining why it very clearly isn't. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The battle does hold significance, it was the very engagement that allowed the NLA to expand its activities into the Kumanovo region, as mentioned in the sources. These events were also widely reported in Western media, such as the LA Times, CNN, and the BBC. Furthermore, it marked another escalation of the conflict, as the NLA targeted Macedonian politicians, including Deputy Interior Minister Refet Elmazi and State Secretary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Ljube Boškoski. GermanManFromFrankfurt (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep

While the Brest ambush in 2001 may appear to involve a relatively small number of casualties, we must not forget that brest was a significant route for the NLA to reach the Karadak zone. This conflict was an insurgency, and it didn't require heavy losses to have an article. Otherwise dozens articles would have to be deleted as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daddyson11111 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, dozens of articles need to be deleted. Also, see WP:WHATABOUTX for arguments to avoid in a discussion. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it definetly meets the criteria of WP:N and has a lot of RS backing it up. This battle is acknowledged by a plethera of sources as well. Durraz0 (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Direct comment on the sources would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Abbott (footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have enough reliable / significant sources. They are mainly stat pages and one book mention. Darkm777 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Darkm777 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't think the 1908 card of him in the article indicates coverage? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but that is not an acceptable policy based argument. Darkm777 (talk) 01:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I-CTDi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This covers the same topic as Common rail#Acronyms and branding used and does not meet WP:N. It is simply a marketing term, used by Honda in the European market between 2002 and 2008.
The article was created as a redirect and remained one for 16 years, when long-term vandal Sevgilerde tried restoring it. It was then turned back into a redirect by ToadetteEdit, Rosguill, Ponyo, Boleyn, and a fifth editor who has since vanished. "i-CTDi" is simply a badging applied by Honda to ~~two separate diesel engines,~~ the N22A engine~~and an Isuzu engine modified by Honda~~. When Honda updated the N22A engine, they switched to the i-DTEC acronym. Both of these are simply marketing terms used by Honda for their diesel engines, just like Renault's DCi, Mercedes' Cgi, and Hyundai's CRDI - all of which were turned into articles by the same vandal and correctly turned back into redirects. Any of the meaningful content used here would be more suitable at Honda N engine or Kenichi Nagahiro (someone just needs to create that).
Also see D-4D, TDCi, Cdi, CDTi for additional, analogous redirects. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. I see some interesting history here. A year ago, I BLAR'd the article claiming that it was non notable, but got quickly reverted. Since then, at least two other reviewers agreed that it should be redirected to common rail, but their attempts were both reverted as well. I currently see that Andy Dingley disagreed with the views of three unique reviewers and restored the article to the version made by the sock together with expanding the article. It looks different than what I initially saw so expect a commentary within the next 24 hours. But now I doubt that the history might warrant a report at ANI, who knows? ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So I took a review of the article, and frankly enough, I do not know if it will pass WP:GNG or not. I see scholary journals discussing the subject in detail, but they are written by people at Honda, so I do not know whether the journals are independent enough or not. I also see that the first source is from Honda,so it does not establish notability in the context. I also see other websites, but they are in favor of the car models other than the subject itself. Unless it can be justified that at least two sources away from Honda show SIGCOV, Redirect to common rail with no prejudice to page development in the draftspace so as to be submitted via AFC. ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add that, as far as I can tell, the SAE article is specifically about the N22A engine – it's paywalled but the blurb makes no mention of the i-CTDi marketing name. Mr.choppers | ✎ 13:46, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anyone be motivated to create an article Kenichi Nagahiro , just so that you can delete it and call them a vandal?

We have policies here based on WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. You are ignoring these in favour of some personal disagreement with another editor. Even if they're guilty of whatever it is you allege, this has now grown to the detriment of the overall project. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GOODFAITH, please. Compare DCi, Cgi, CRDI, D-4D, TDCi, Cdi, CDTi. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or a better message is to both of you to be separate one another and assume good faith. In particular that the comment above does not address the content but rather to the nominator, which is short of the Wikipedia:Civility policy. ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to hide behind 'good faith' when you're the one repeatedly describing anyone who disagrees with you as a vandal. First time you did this to me you were taken to ANI over it. You then repeated the same term. So please don't pretend that you didn't know that at least one of us here finds that a deeply offensive allegation. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Europe. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Jefferson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources. Only external link is IMDb. User:Tankishguy talk :) say hi 21:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. User:Tankishguy talk :) say hi 21:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, Anime and manga, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It might be worth noting that the article title probably should be Stacey Gregg (the page with that name has been deleted a few times previously). Don't think she was ever known as Stacy (without the e). She was also known for roles in the US as Stacey Maxwell, eg in The Virginian, The Monkees and Batman. In the UK she's known for roles in Crossroads https://www.newspapers.com/image/893742133 and playing Sandy in Grease alongside Richard Gere eg https://www.newspapers.com/image/840906998 There's a few more hits at https://www.newspapers.com/search/results/?keyword=%22Stacey+Gregg%22++&region=gb-eng worth checking the British Newspaper Archive as well, see also this two-page articles from the TV Times in 1971 (page 8-9) https://mcmweb.co.uk/tvtimes/1971/Nov%206th%201971.pdf Piecesofuk (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As Stacey Gregg she meets WP:NACTOR. She has also been credited as Stacey Jefferson and Stacey Richardson. As well as voicing the roles mentioned in the current article, she played Daffy in all episodes of Tottering Towers and Nurse Baxter in 23 episodes of Crossroads from 1977-1978. On stage, she played Sandy opposite Richard Gere in the British premiere of Grease (musical), first in Coventry and then on the West End. As well as the coverage found by Piecesofuk, there is coverage and information about more roles in the British Newspaper Archive. I'll add more info and sources to the article. There appears to be another Stacey Gregg, probably also notable, who is director of Here Before and co-creator/director of other shows. RebeccaGreen (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christelle Bedran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear fail of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, contested prod. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Middle East, and Lebanon. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sources (such as [4]) are enough to demonstrate notability of the subject. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lebanese Football Association is a primary website. One source is not enough to demonstrate notability, even if it contains IRS SIGCOV. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep—Although I recognize that FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association, and thus I believe the above source is valid, I'm not sure it's enough to bring this article fully into WP:SIGCOV compliance. That said, if we take the policy exactly by its letter, I think this article creeps barely over the line. Anwegmann (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beerware

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Slight merge to open source is possible, but this page should not remain as-is due to a general lack of any notability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:22, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Software. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:22, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Searching in Google Books, and reviewing past discussions, it seems there is some coverage in reliable sources ([5][6][7]), but all of it seems to be passing mentions. I would favor a redirect/merge to Open-source license or any other appropriate target. MarioGom (talk) 21:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:35, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

St. Patrick Church (Wyandotte)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable parish church in metro Detroit. The only source provided is an official parish history, which is obviously non-independent. A WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing usable except a local news piece on its 155th anniversary, which is not enough on its own for a WP:GNG pass as a standalone page. Open to a redirect to List_of_churches_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Archdiocese_of_Detroit#South_Region, where it is mentioned, but bringing it to AfD since it has already been draftified and returned to mainspace without improvements, so I didn't think a WP:BLAR was appropriate in that situation. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Organizations, Christianity, and Michigan. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found more in a WP:BEFORE search including sources from 1890: [8]. The book Catholic Churches of Detroit (Godzak, 2004) may not quite be SIGCOV, but there's good mention in Irish in Michigan (Metress & Metress, 2006). I stopped searching there. This absolutely needs better sources, I'm not yet convinced it's a keep but if it's not it's not too far off. SportingFlyer T·C 08:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the list article recommended by Dclemens1971. —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Camillo Bonelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination: Notability disputed. This article hasn't been expanded in 18 years. A list of captains regent of San Marino, 1701–1900 already exists and this article doesn't add any additional information. (Alternatively, I propose to redirect this page to that page.) MmeMaigret (talk) 03:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as ATD. Mccapra (talk) 04:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as alternative to deletion. Nixleovel (talk) 06:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Europe. Shellwood (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Shanahan (businesswoman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:BLP1E, only known for winning The Apprentice (Irish TV series). LibStar (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Television, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable Nixleovel (talk) 06:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable. A redirect to The Apprentice (Irish TV series) is possible but I dint really see the point. Mccapra (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Astrid Gynnild

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just an awfully self-referential article, created by a WP:SPA, lacking any independent sources, and reading like a resume. BD2412 T 01:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Norway. BD2412 T 01:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable. The only sources I can find for this individual are from a university associated with the individual. Nixleovel (talk) 06:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Shellwood (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Riverview Park, Berks County, Pennsylvania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page was originally created in 2010 and has had only minor changes since then. It's never contained any references as far I can tell (NB: I'm still a newbie at reading the changelogs, so I could've missed one). It's been marked as "unreferenced" since 2019 without any references getting added. There's some decent text in the article, but I couldn't find any sources for the information, and the page is a near-orphan, only linked to by one other article (well, four total, but three are a list of places, a talk page, and a user page). I'd be happy for it to stick around if anyone can verify the info, but the user who generated the main text of the page doesn't exist anymore, so I don't know who'd be able to supply references. Local Internet User (talk) 01:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pennsylvania. Shellwood (talk) 09:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dany Haddad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added source is just a small mention including a quote and not SIGCOV for meeting WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Lebanon. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Based on pictures being accessible and his accomplishments, it feels very likely that coverage will exist. We should actually look in newspaper archives. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luz Marina Geerman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added source seems like a database listing. Lack of SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. Also does not meet WP:NATH. LibStar (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Sport of athletics, and South America. LibStar (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glaze (slang)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTSLANG. Already covered in Glossary of Generation Z slang and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/glaze . Also not notable enough to warrant its own page, as opposed to terms like Brain rot. Shioshiioo (talk) 00:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Return (2001)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches like "Operation Return" and "Preševo" and similar search terms turn up negligible results, almost exclusively wiki mirrors. This isn't much of a surprise considering this operation consisted of troops essentially walking in unopposed after the Končulj Agreement, and can be described in a few sentences at Insurgency in the Preševo Valley. Fails WP:GNG. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Kosovo and Yugoslavia. Shellwood (talk) 09:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dalyboy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I did a Google search of him and didn't find reliable coverage independent of him. All of the article's sources are primary sources. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:05, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:05, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Per my review, he appears to meet some of the criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. He has charted on Apple Music, received significant and consistent airplay according to several press sources, and produced and featured in a movie that was nominated for awards — with the nomination also mentioned on Van Vicker’s page. I would recommend a ‘keep’ while the article continues to be improved. Klighnight (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Nixleovel (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files

File:Terranova-killed Battaglia.jpg

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Letizia Battaglia Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At least until Commons is resovled. Buffs (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Templates and Modules

Template:2024–25 National League 1

Template:2024–25 National League 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Common practive to not use tables and insert them directly to their respective page. Louis (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2025–26 National League 1

Template:2025–26 National League 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Common practive to not use tables and insert them directly to their respective page. Louis (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2024–25 RFU Championship Table

Template:2024–25 RFU Championship Table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed. Common practice to place the table directly onto the page (see 2023–24 Premiership Rugby for example), this was previously deleted on 12 June 2024 (see here.) If the table wanted to be used on any other article, Template:Section can be used Louis (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2025–26 Champ Rugby Table

Template:2025–26 Champ Rugby Table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed. Common practice to place the table directly onto the page (see 2023–24 Premiership Rugby for example), this was previously deleted on 22 May 2025 (see here.) If the table wanted to be used on any other article, Template:Section can be used Louis (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

Deletion review

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:16th-century Danish engravers

Category:21st-century Czech engravers

Category:Burial sites of the House of Beni Alfons

Redirects

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review