User:Bellerophon/Tools
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
| ||||
Template:R template index - redirect template index
|
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]Administrative backlog[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]
User-reported[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: Deletion backlog {{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 148 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported[edit]
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent IP link spam. Biruitorul Talk 18:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per CTOP PIA restrictions, article currently semi protected due to vandalism but still attracting a lot of editing around contentious topics. CoconutOctopus talk 19:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection (indef.) Vandalism (writing in all caps (“shouting”) and adding curse words 166.198.157.57 (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement and WP:ARBPIA GiraffeLover19 (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Related to gambling scandal. Sushidude21! (talk) 21:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: IP user resumed edit warring to reinsert incorrect information about the game's art director since lifting of previous protection. Void if removed (talk) 22:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent addition of unsourced content due to transfer rumours, requesting a week's protection to prevent this. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 23:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Presistent BLP violations from IP users. Roast (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: IP vandalism, removal of sourced content, and addition of unsourced information or trivia. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2018. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2009. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2009. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: This page has been protected for over 12 years, and no disruption has occurred since 2009. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: This page has been protected for over 12 years, and no disruption has occurred since 2008. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: This page has been protected for over 12 years, and no disruption has occurred since 2008. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: Make way to accept Draft:Gillie da Kid at AfC. The title was salted by Maxim 18 years ago; they do not appear to be active. JSFarman (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Please correct the Iranian civilian casualties in paragraph three. It was recently changed without reason from 200 to 600. The sources currently listed actually say 200 but this is out off date. HRANA's latest figure is actually over 400. The source is presently used in the infobox for their own estimate of 1,054 total deaths. The Iranian government hasn't released updated figures so that should be removed until they have an estimate. I suggest adding the sentence: "According to the anti-government Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency, over 1,000 Iranians were killed including at least 400 civilians." 102.17.119.14 (talk) 03:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Handled requests[edit]Protected edit requests
RFA= Requests for adminship RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
As of writing, I have created more than 50 articles from either redlinks or expanded redirects alongside ~30 templates, with only one superfluous template having been deleted. With a dozen Good Article and DYK citations, I believe I have proven myself in understanding the fomat and style of Wikipedia. My current project, to create articles on US Civil War-era ship classes, has and will quickly add more to the backlog. I have never had any issue with the New Page Patrol (that I recall), and would like to not add to their work as several of my previous articles/templates took months to be marked as reviewed (quite understandable, it's a large backlog!). My newest articles, all created since this weekend, (Mohican-class sloop, Sacramento-class sloop, Algoma-class sloop, and Potomac-class frigate) are well cited and comply with all requirments. Thank you! GGOTCC 02:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.
Page mover[edit]
I am requesting page mover right mainly because it would help me draftify articles (see my draftify log). And secondarily because it would allow me to perform uncontroversial moves in mainspace without leaving being redirects. I have not participated in RMs but I have made moves that show that I understand the guidelines, namely:
And more recently
I was recommended to return after over a dozen requests at RMTR, and after Gaza war mvoes, I think I've well surpassed that threshold. I'm otherwise keen to continue closing RMs in the backblog, and it'd make it more convenient to implement WP:POSTMOVE after closing such discussions rather than later. Thanks for your re-consideration. CNC (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC) CNC (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, While patrolling the recent changes, I often run into pending changes. I think I am a good candidate for this permission because I already revert vandalism prolifically. I have read WP:RPC and whenever I revert something that's not blatant vandalism/a BLP violation, I always include an adequate edit summary, so I would also be able to tell which pending changes are low-quality good-faith edits and let them through (with amendments after, possibly). I also never engage in edit wars or abuse my rollback function. Spotemgottem (talk) 08:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
I am respectfully requesting rollback rights as I am committed to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia by actively monitoring recent changes and promptly reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, I believe that the rollback tool will allow me to more efficiently contribute to the maintenance of article integrity and the overall improvement of the encyclopedia. Vineyard93 (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I saw that rollbackers need 200+ edits and noticed that I've cleared that mark so here is my request: I have been actively reverting vandalism via WP:RW and filters. I apply an adequate edit summary and warn for every single rollback I make using RedWarn. I understand clearly that rollback is for cases of clear-cut vandalism and other edits where the reason for the revert is obvious (such as uncited defamatory statements on a living person). Whenever I encounter a good-faith yet low-quality edit, I either leave it be or undo it with a suitable custom edit summary (and a talkpage message explaining why the edit was reverted). Having this user right would allow me to try out Huggle which I believe would be more efficient than RedWarn's RC patrol or refreshing the browser. Thank you. Spotemgottem (talk) 00:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've had several months of experience patrolling recent changes and clearing vandalism. In addition, I often revert sockpuppet edits. I therefore humbly request for the rollback right so that reverting obvious vandalism and sockpuppet/LTA edits (such as by using mass rollback) would be easier. I've read through WP:Rollback thoroughly as well. I understand that for the usual rollback, I need to try to use it with caution as it performs reverts in just one click/tap. Thank you. ~SG5536B 01:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
I’m a very active recent changes patroller, very comfortable identifying vandalism and using WP:TW to revert, warn, and report vandals. I’m careful to avoid using immediate revert unless the edit is obviously vandalism. Rollback would allow me to more efficiently fight very active vandals before an administrator is able to block them. I would still use WP:TW in most cases, for routine recent changes patrol. ZachH007 22:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
I’ve been using Twinkle to revert vandalism from recent changes and warn users for a while now. I’ve been doing this for about two years, with some breaks because of school and life, but I’ve stayed consistent overall. I know what counts as vandalism and what doesn’t, and I always try to assume good faith. I’d really appreciate rollback to help make reverting quicker and save time. I can be trusted with the tool and use it properly. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Footer[edit]Policies and links |
My Tools
[edit]ACC stuff
[edit]- User:Bellerophon/Custom emails
- Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide
- Wikipedia:Username policy
- Technical restrictions on usernames
- Account creation interface login
AfC stuff
[edit]Copyright stuff
[edit]- Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems
- Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations
- Remove the infringing text or revert the page to a non-copyrighted version if you can.
- The infringing text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it (unless it is tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). When possible, please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem. The templates {{subst:Uw-copyright}} and {{subst:Uw-copyright-new}} may be used for this purpose.
- However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, or reversion/removal is otherwise complicated:
- Replace the text with one of the following:
{{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}{{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}} - Go to today's section and add
to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)* {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~ - Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.
{{subst:cclean|url=}}
- Copyvio detector tool (use with caution, prone to weirdness...)
- Duplication detector tool
- User:MadmanBot/manual
Adoption stuff
[edit]- User:Bellerophon/Adoption
- User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Assignments/Questions
- {{subst:User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Welcome}}
- {{subst:User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Gradcert}}
Anti-vandal stuff
[edit]- Reflinks Tool
- User:CorenSearchBot/manual
- Wikipedia:Cv101
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions
- Warning Templates
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
- Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types
- UTM Subpages
Special pages
[edit]- List of colors
- Special:PrefixIndex/User:Pol430
- Special:PrefixIndex/User:Bellerophon
- Special:Log
- Special:AbuseLog
- Special:NewPages
- Special:NewPagesFeed
- Special:PendingChanges
- Special:RecentChanges
Quick templates
[edit]- {{subst:ANI-notice}}
- {{GOCE|user=Bellerophon|date=}}
Sister projects
[edit]Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:
-
Commons
Free media repository -
MediaWiki
Wiki software development -
Meta-Wiki
Wikimedia project coordination -
Wikibooks
Free textbooks and manuals -
Wikidata
Free knowledge base -
Wikinews
Free-content news -
Wikiquote
Collection of quotations -
Wikisource
Free-content library -
Wikispecies
Directory of species -
Wikiversity
Free learning tools -
Wikivoyage
Free travel guide -
Wiktionary
Dictionary and thesaurus