User:Gazimoff/Bookmarks
Current workstack
Sandboxes
Videogame bookmarks Admin bookmarks
Admin dashboard Admin dashboard
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]Administrative backlog[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]User-reported[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: Deletion backlog {{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 11 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 190 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items Requested RD1 redactions – 15 items Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported[edit]
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Infinite extended confirmed protection Arbitration enforcement, it about the Arab-Israeli conflict. ArtopiaBoy (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: Vandalism. Long semiprotection needed. Island92 (talk) 04:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The edit warring here continues. Perhaps implement a higher level of restriction for a month as her album is released today. Karst (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism of the page related to indigenous culture and content. Repeated disruptive editing, especially from anonymous users. Requesting semi-protection or extended confirmed protection to maintain page integrity. Titi7000 (talk) 12:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC) [1]. [2] References
Reason: Requesting semi protection. Lot of IP edits on content dispute especially with bio. Only requesting a brief protection due to the NYC primary approaching and more media coverage. Malibukenz (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content (and violation of MOS:TV/WP:TVGUIDE over long term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per ARBPIA5, PIA articles ECR by default. Longhornsg (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Like fellow redirect That's Entertainment (Hazbin Hotel), keeps being recreated by sock- and meatpuppeteer. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR: Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring again, previously involving another user, now with IP, the same involved editor, looks to be exhibiting ownership issues and that other is always wrong, they're always right. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: Frequent unsourced changes to wind speeds, primarily from IPs, over the last few months. This has been an apparent majority of edits to the page. Departure– (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been consistently vandalized by IP users, adding and removing things back and forth (might be the same person) for a long time now, as can be seen throughout the history. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection: Contentious topic restriction. Dahawk04 (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Years' worth of additions of completely unsourced material (or additions of retired equipment, beyond the article's WP:SCOPE). The article is covered by WP:ARBEE and was semi-protected in the past. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC). Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary extended protection: Persistent trolling by bigots. Cremastra (Go Oilers!) 20:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 22:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, stemming from previous page protection, for an upcoming film release. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Migfab008 (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2007. I doubt this very low-profile article will be the target of a lot of disruption after nearly 18 years have past, having seen only 9 edits from 2020 to 2025 and a whopping 941 views in the past year (see here). The protecting administrator hasn't been active since 2012. This also doesn't fall under WP:CT/A-I, despite the context subject. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Unprotection: Article was protected in 2021 for vandalism. I have found no evidence that this vandal is still active, and the article seems unlikely to become a vandalism magnet again over four years later it was also Wikipedia:General sanctions/COVID-19 I think is time to unprotect this article. 47.21.129.66 (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Reason: I think it's been long enough. 2603:8080:600:AADE:5C90:5D32:294E:8565 (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Handled requests[edit]Protected edit requests
RFA= Requests for adminship RFP= Requests for permissions There are no outstanding requests for account creator.
Autopatrolled[edit]
Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have created 96 articles so far, out of which only 2 have been deleted. Most of my articles are well-sourced biographies, mainly related to the Pakistan Army, with some focused on media personalities. I strive to follow Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines in all my contributions. Granting me autopatrolled status will help reduce the workload for new page reviewers. You may also consider taking suggestions from the reviewers (JTtheOG, John B123) who frequently review my pages, as they are familiar with the quality and consistency of my work. Behappyyar (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
As a reviewer at NPP I frequently accept book articles by this user. They've created 62 mainspace articles with 0 deletions. Their articles are easy accepts (clearly indicate how the book passes WP:NBOOK and do not need any error-fixing); may as well take them out of the backlog. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights My account has been up for 4 days, made over 10 edits, and did not get autoconfirmed, something wrong? SovietAddict68 (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
File mover[edit]
I’d like to request file mover rights to help fix unclear or poorly named files in line with naming guidelines. I'm familiar with tagging files for renaming and understand the relevant policies. Being able to handle simple, non-controversial moves myself would speed up the process. I’ll use the tool responsibly and continue contributing to file maintenance. Thanks. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 16:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.
Mass message sender[edit]
I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed recent changes patroller who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights. By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there! Despite my account having existed since 2009, I only have a modest edit count - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges. I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding. If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself. Thank you very much for your time & consideration. ···sardonism · t · c 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I think I'm supposed to have this as I see an option suddenly for pending changes on my watchlist, for the article Remote sensing? I was going to approve (it's just a newer user adding some book references), but I guess I cannot? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
A little bit ago I made a request (which was declined - account new), I am again requesting this right because: -My account is now over a month old -My account is extended confirmed -Lately, I have run across a lot of fine pending changes edits, but I can not approve them only revert them As you can see, the main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism, you noted I should be a little more careful in doing so, which is what I did. I think this right would allow me to reduce backlog, and do something I like (reverting vandalism) in a different way. As you can see, I am also requesting the rollback right, which would help me with this process as while as reverting vandalism in general. Whatever the outcome is, thank you. If it is not done, please provide me with steps I can take to get approved. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I do a lot of Recent Changes patrol for anti-vandalism purposes, and I'd like to be able to approve the good edits to protected pages I come across (instead of just reverting things...) Thanks for your consideration. penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I am back again. A little bit ago, I requested this right, and it was denied because it was not old enough.[1] My account is now one month old and I have extended confirmed permissions.[2] I was wondering if that is enough to get me this permission, thanks. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! As I started to edit in Wikipedia (music), I have seen a lot of vadalisms (or bad edits) from some articles. But if one user spoiled it by multiple times, I have to rollback one by one, which takes a lot of time. So I request this permisson to make rollback for vadal easier, thanks! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC) There are no outstanding requests for template editor. Footer[edit]Policies and links Policies, processes etc Miscellaneous |
