Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Wynwick55gl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1135 (LTA 1135, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Suspicious behavior by a new user. Might warrant a look from a check user. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- 159.146.72.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:56, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- User:Wynwick55gl's behaviour is very suspicious. Jumping straight into AFD (including AFDs on the Middle East) and, even worse, ANI. Even showed up at the bot-reported list above. Geschichte (talk) 08:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- 93.11.98.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Vandalism after final warning, including [1] and [2] --Sable232 (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Stale report. User has not edited in 6 days. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Elolololo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Prettiestkittiestittiest (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "titties" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ieditshitman (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Flakobinladen (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bin ?lad[ei]n" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Caillou'sUltimatePunishmentDay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stinkyfootburr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Misleading, promotional, offensive, and disruptive (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jclinton1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 16:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm-Destroyer-of-Worlds (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- OfficialReader (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ghanta farak padta hai (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Celestial Unlimited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- The Keeper Of Tamrielic Lore And History (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Management1125 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- University of Nothing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Milfhunter6353 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Terrydavisthebackestspinnest (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TroyPofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MyUsernameWasTakenSoITookThisOne (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Tosin Salako (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Has declared that they are not Tosin Salako but are representing him professionally. They must change their user name. The only way to ensure this is a warning shot. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 21:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- The account is representing an artist by that name. We allow real names, but in this case it's their employer's/client's real name rather than their own. What do others think? Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well, WP:REALNAME states
Do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name.
Think that's pretty clear. For example, what if Salako splits from this person. Who controls the account? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)- On top of that, WP:REALNAME states: "If a username implies that the user is, or is related to, a notable, identifiable or well-known person, the account may be blocked as a precaution against impersonation until the user's proof of identity is provided." Anyone can claim to be a representative of a well-known person, so such a claim would also require proof to satisfy this portion of the policy. I'm holding off from immediately blocking due to the discussion initiated at User talk:Tosin Salako § Immediate action required, but the account should be blocked if its username is not changed to a policy-compliant one in a reasonable amount of time. — Newslinger talk 21:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Should be blocked if they are not the named person(even if they are a representative). 331dot (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- They've not edited since 3 June. Secretlondon (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- On top of that, WP:REALNAME states: "If a username implies that the user is, or is related to, a notable, identifiable or well-known person, the account may be blocked as a precaution against impersonation until the user's proof of identity is provided." Anyone can claim to be a representative of a well-known person, so such a claim would also require proof to satisfy this portion of the policy. I'm holding off from immediately blocking due to the discussion initiated at User talk:Tosin Salako § Immediate action required, but the account should be blocked if its username is not changed to a policy-compliant one in a reasonable amount of time. — Newslinger talk 21:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well, WP:REALNAME states
- The account is representing an artist by that name. We allow real names, but in this case it's their employer's/client's real name rather than their own. What do others think? Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- SkibidiOhio5 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Disruptive username. Username sounds similar to the usernames of the so-called "Skibidi vandal", a long-term vandal with multiple accounts that had usernames like this and would vandalize pages by replacing them with the phrase "Goofy ahh brainrot:skull:" among other things. RaschenTechner (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) For what it's worth "skibidi" and "ohio" are normal memes outside of the world of Wikipedia vandalism. I'd honestly be surprised if there weren't multiple legitimate accounts with both words in their username already. This user doesn't appear to have vandalized at all. — Tony talk 01:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is very common youth slang and is not an indication that they are the Skibidi vandal. They also haven't edited since May. Patient Zerotalk 01:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. Also, not a violation. Target stores sell Skibidi Toilet paraphernalia these days. Cullen328 (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- OfficialAmericanBeauty (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as implying shared use (see edits). ☆ Bri (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. They may be affiliated with the beauty pageant they are editing about, but it's not called "American Beauty". 331dot (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Elizaghostwriter23$ (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Appears to be a username which advertises articles written for pay as $23 a go. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 07:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with this username. Where did you get the work-for-hire stuff from? They haven't edited to advertise their services, and haven't promoted their services on the wiki. The username represents an individual. Secretlondon (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Tederoni Racing Championship (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. TLJ7863 (talk) 13:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Rubberdamology (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Http://rubberdamology.org/. TLJ7863 (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Infinite extended confirmed protection Arbitration enforcement, it about the Arab-Israeli conflict. ArtopiaBoy (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. Long semiprotection needed. Island92 (talk) 04:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The edit warring here continues. Perhaps implement a higher level of restriction for a month as her album is released today. Karst (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism of the page related to indigenous culture and content. Repeated disruptive editing, especially from anonymous users. Requesting semi-protection or extended confirmed protection to maintain page integrity. Titi7000 (talk) 12:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC) [1]. [2]
References
- ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akwete_cloth
- ^ Chudi-Duru, Chika (2021). "Shifting the Boundaries of Akwete-Igbo Traditional Weaving: An Imperative for Development of Igbo Traditional Weaving". Graspact Journal of Art and Technology. 1 (4): 11–22. Retrieved 2025-06-06.
Automated comment: @Titi7000: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 6 June 2025 (UTC)- I fixed the link at the top of the section, but no comment on the request. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi protection. Lot of IP edits on content dispute especially with bio. Only requesting a brief protection due to the NYC primary approaching and more media coverage. Malibukenz (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content (and violation of MOS:TV/WP:TVGUIDE over long term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per ARBPIA5, PIA articles ECR by default. Longhornsg (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Like fellow redirect That's Entertainment (Hazbin Hotel), keeps being recreated by sock- and meatpuppeteer. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR: Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area
. Many edits are in violation of this policy, so it appears that protection is necessary. Yours truly, Stuffinwriting | talk | sign | contributions 04:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring again, previously involving another user, now with IP, the same involved editor, looks to be exhibiting ownership issues and that other is always wrong, they're always right. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Comes under WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been consistently vandalized by IP users, adding and removing things back and forth (might be the same person) for a long time now, as can be seen throughout the history. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Contentious topic restriction. Dahawk04 (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Years' worth of additions of completely unsourced material (or additions of retired equipment, beyond the article's WP:SCOPE). The article is covered by WP:ARBEE and was semi-protected in the past. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC). Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent trolling by bigots. Cremastra (Go Oilers!) 20:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP (possibly a range) repeatedly adding unsourced content. DonIago (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Kiran Rathod page vandalism
The article Kiran Rathod has recently been subject to repeated malicious edits, falsely labeling her as an adult actress without reliable sources. Some of the content given in the page is also false and I have the consent of the person in subject to raise this issue of maligning, misinformation and labelling her.This violates Wikipedia's BLP (Biographies of Living Persons) policy.
I request semi-protection to prevent further vandalism and defamation. See the edit history for examples.
Thank you. Bharath75 (talk) 05:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yuvaank (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and edit war. Please long semiprotection needed. Island92 (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Humanitarian Aid Distribution Program in the Gaza Strip (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This is a redirect that is relevant to WP:ARBPIA, thanks in advance. (If there's a better place to make a request for redirects please let me know.) Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done. AFD closed in a merge, hence it is a redirect not worth protecting now. Materialscientist (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection (for at least 6 months): Months-long campaign by some unregistered users and possible single-purpose accounts to remove some well-sourced information. The edits rise to the level of vandalism when they subtly rearrange text to bury the fact that they're removing sourced information, while using misleading edit summaries. The accounts may be connected but declared no conflicts of interest. Nemo 11:57, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – [ɑƞʈuɼeđ] [⍣] [⁂] 12:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:52, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Silly dispute over the correct language of an airport in Fiji, with the battle going over Hindi or Fijian Hindi. The Banner talk 14:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding unnecessary flags. Vestrian24Bio 14:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous-sock hopping IP across several pages pertaining to Ciara. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2007. I doubt this very low-profile article will be the target of a lot of disruption after nearly 18 years have past, having seen only 9 edits from 2020 to 2025 and a whopping 941 views in the past year (see here). The protecting administrator hasn't been active since 2012. This also doesn't fall under WP:CT/A-I, despite the context subject. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: Article was protected in 2021 for vandalism. I have found no evidence that this vandal is still active, and the article seems unlikely to become a vandalism magnet again over four years later it was also Wikipedia:General sanctions/COVID-19 I think is time to unprotect this article. 47.21.129.66 (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I think it's been long enough. 2603:8080:600:AADE:5C90:5D32:294E:8565 (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2008 due to apparent sockpuppetry (from this banned user, I suppose). The first Madagascar film was also semi-protected that day for the same reason, but had since been unprotected in 2018. As the first film gains more than twice the amount of views than this one in the past year (see here), doesn't see really much disruptive activity right now, and that sockpuppeteer primarily targeting on Disney articles, perhaps it's time to test whether long-term protection is still needed? The protecting administrator has long retired since 2010. BriDash9000 (talk) 10:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: To make way for AFC accept. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 10:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It can be unprotected if the AFC is accepted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2013, for apparently the same reason as the first 2 Madagascar films. As this article has seen only 13 edits from 2024 to 2025, just 26,474 views in the past year (see here), and that sockpuppeteer primarily targeting on Disney articles, I suppose we could try unprotecting this one. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2015. BriDash9000 (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Per WP:TRYUNPROT (protecting admin hasn't been active for many years). OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have created 96 articles so far, out of which only 2 have been deleted. Most of my articles are well-sourced biographies, mainly related to the Pakistan Army, with some focused on media personalities. I strive to follow Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines in all my contributions. Granting me autopatrolled status will help reduce the workload for new page reviewers. You may also consider taking suggestions from the reviewers (JTtheOG, John B123) who frequently review my pages, as they are familiar with the quality and consistency of my work. Behappyyar (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
As a reviewer at NPP I frequently accept book articles by this user. They've created 62 mainspace articles with 0 deletions. Their articles are easy accepts (clearly indicate how the book passes WP:NBOOK and do not need any error-fixing); may as well take them out of the backlog. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm doing a lot of repetitive edits on articles, fixing typos, improving grammar and adding consistent info across pages, so I need AutoWikiBrowser to make the process smoother. I especially need it for pages related to railway stations and Chak villages, where I've been working on adding almost same information. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I’ve created quite a handful of pages on the Nigerian portal, but I often find it difficult to finish everything. I have to drop a shout everytime on GoingBatty’s talk page (didn’t want to ping him) to help tidy things up. I mostly focus on creating pages, and doing all the edits manually doesn’t help. Please consider me for the AutoWikiBrowser permission. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 23:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I have previously been approved as User:Theknine2, but I have since changed my username to User:TenthAvenueFreezeOut, so I need my old username (Theknine2) to be replaced with my current username inside the list. Thank you! TenthAvenueFreezeOut (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I tried WPCleaner and I like the concept, but WPCleaner had some jank and seems less customizable and polished than AWB. I was hoping to clean up typos along with syntax/formatting, and a tool like AWB seems much easier on the eyes for finding problems like that. If it isn't what I am looking for, I'll request permission removal if that is preferable. 【💬】 22:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights My account has been up for 4 days, made over 10 edits, and did not get autoconfirmed, something wrong? SovietAddict68 (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
My main account has this permissions (User:ExplorerofSpace), and I would like to have it on this one as well. ExplorerofUniverse (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
This is the alt account of R1F4T and I have this right on my main means on the R1F4T account so to contribute from local networks and public devices like school or colleges device and others device I am asking for this right খাত্তাব (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
hey so I was on a talk page requesting an edit to a page be done, no one replied so I got bored. I was playing around with my sandbox because I was bored. I made tons of edits goofing around. because I played around with my sandbox I was almost at 515 edits. I saw that and was surprised. I decided to edit pages that require extended confirmed access. And then I edited the page where I left a comment on the talk page because no one was replying. Immediately my extended confirmed rights were revoked. Someone said I was gaming the system to get extended confirmed rights, when that's simply not true. I was just goofing around with my talk page, that's all. Gaming the system wasn't my intention. If it was I would've stopped why did I stop at 511 edits or so, that doesn't make sense. And if I was gaming the system to edit extended access I don't vandalize pages or nothing. I make normal edits to improve pages, so can I have extended confirmed back please GloryToCalifornia (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
I’d like to request file mover rights to help fix unclear or poorly named files in line with naming guidelines. I'm familiar with tagging files for renaming and understand the relevant policies. Being able to handle simple, non-controversial moves myself would speed up the process. I’ll use the tool responsibly and continue contributing to file maintenance. Thanks. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 16:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year now. I'm interested in becoming a New Page Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of new content on Wikipedia. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my New Page Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed there's a pretty large backlog, so I decided to volunteer. I've taken a break from my usual editing the past few days to get familiar with the NPR process. I’ve written articles on all sorts of topics, especially biographies, geography. I'm not comparatively active in AfD, but my understanding of various notability guidelines could be useful when reviewing articles. Thank you! Pasados (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Renewing rights from a 30 day trial granted by @User:Rosguill. Veko (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for New Page Reviewer right. I have been a Wikipedia editor for 8 years, created several articles and have also been a reader in AFD discussions. Through this, I have gained understanding of the requirements for a new page creation. I have also contributed to delete discussions and I have been known to show respect for others in such discussions. Would appreciate the opportunity to contribute further. Thanks in advance. Ataavi (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will like to request new page reviewer rights because I want to assist in the reduction of large backlog at AfC, I edit some new articles at New Page Feeds, I participate in AFD, and have knowledge of deletion process. I have a good knowledge of content policies and guidelines. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 17:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
My NPR rights expire at the end of this month and I would like to extend it or make permanent. Thanks! Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 00:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request 1 month NPR to participate in the backlog drive, I'm currently an AfC reviewer and have good knowledge of guidelines for CSD, draftifying, etc. Destinyokhiria (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
My temporary NPR permission expired yesterday. I would like to extend it or make permanent. Thanks in advance. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights. I've created a number of math and My Little Pony articles, and I think I have a good grasp of what a new page should have. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed there's a significant backlog of pending articles for review, and I'd love to help by joining the new pages patrol. To start, I'll focus on handling the simpler cases JohnMizuki (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Requesting extension of NPP rights. I participated in the WP:MAY25 backlog drive and believe I did well with adding WikiProjects, categories, general cleanup. I have also worked some with the draftify tool and used when necessary. I still participate at AfD regularly and plan to be somewhat consistent reviewing pages, mainly in my fields of knowledge, elections, politicians, some football. Few issues were raised with my reviews but hopefully I have overcome these and have been taking more care reviewing to ensure issues do not come up again. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed recent changes patroller who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights. By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there! Despite my account having existed since 2009, I only have a modest edit count - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges. I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding. If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself. Thank you very much for your time & consideration. ···sardonism · t · c 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I think I'm supposed to have this as I see an option suddenly for pending changes on my watchlist, for the article Remote sensing? I was going to approve (it's just a newer user adding some book references), but I guess I cannot? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
A little bit ago I made a request (which was declined - account new), I am again requesting this right because: -My account is now over a month old -My account is extended confirmed -Lately, I have run across a lot of fine pending changes edits, but I can not approve them only revert them As you can see, the main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism, you noted I should be a little more careful in doing so, which is what I did. I think this right would allow me to reduce backlog, and do something I like (reverting vandalism) in a different way. As you can see, I am also requesting the rollback right, which would help me with this process as while as reverting vandalism in general. Whatever the outcome is, thank you. If it is not done, please provide me with steps I can take to get approved. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I do a lot of Recent Changes patrol for anti-vandalism purposes, and I'd like to be able to approve the good edits to protected pages I come across (instead of just reverting things...) Thanks for your consideration. penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I am back again. A little bit ago, I requested this right, and it was denied because it was not old enough.[1] My account is now one month old and I have extended confirmed permissions.[2] I was wondering if that is enough to get me this permission, thanks. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I lost my template editor rights at some point due to one year's inactivity. I would be most grateful to have them restored. Thank you. ♦ JAGUAR 10:56, 8 June 2025 (UTC) |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |